Home
search
more | tips
IMDb > The Mark of Cain (2007)

The Mark of Cain (2007) More at IMDbPro »


Overview

User Rating:
6.5/10   674 votes
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 17% in popularity this week. See rank & trends on IMDbPro.
Director:
Marc Munden
Writer:
Tony Marchant (writer)
Contact:
View company contact information for The Mark of Cain on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
25 November 2008 (USA) more
Genre:
Drama more
Plot:
Uses detailed research and explosive new testimonies by soldiers who have served in Iraq to tell an emotional fictional story of two young men very much out of their depth. full summary | add synopsis
Awards:
6 wins & 5 nominations more
User Comments:
Falls down a bit in the final third but is mostly strong and convincing more

Cast

  (Cast overview, first billed only)

Gerard Kearns ... Mark 'Treacle' Tate

Matthew McNulty ... Shane Gulliver
Naomi Bentley ... Shelley

Elliot Cowan ... Captain Worriss
Brendan Coyle ... Davey Gulliver
Heather Craney ... Brenda Tate

Shaun Dingwall ... Major Godber
Shaun Dooley ... Corporal Gant

Leo Gregory ... Lance Corporal Quealey

Alistair Petrie ... Major Rod Gilchrist
Pip Torrens ... Colonel Hampton

Roger Barclay ... Adjutant
Matthew Gravelle ... Chaplain
Kevin Knapman ... Pvt Soldier 1
Simon Naylor ... Pvt Soldier 2
more
Create a character page for: ?

Additional Details

MPAA:
Rated R for violent and disturbing content including torture, pervasive language and some nudity.
Runtime:
87 min | Netherlands:90 min (International Film Festival Rotterdam)
Country:
UK
Language:
English
Colour:
Colour
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 more
Sound Mix:
Dolby Digital
Certification:
Finland:K-15 | Australia:MA (2007) | USA:R

Fun Stuff

Goofs:
Continuity: When Gulliver and Tate are outside, before they go to beat the prisoners, the scene changes from morning to the middle of the night, after watching the other soldiers walk towards the cells and cut back to them talking. more

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
5 out of 7 people found the following comment useful:-
Falls down a bit in the final third but is mostly strong and convincing, 6 May 2007
Author: bob the moo from Birmingham, UK

Once the mission was "accomplished" in Iraq and the end of major combat operations was announced, parts of the country were handed over to the armed forces for the purposes of enforcing the peace and winning over the hearts and minds of the newly free Iraqi people. A group of British soldiers are stationed in Basra to this end under a steady commander. However when a patrol is ambushed and their commander is lost, the decision is made to enforce justice fast and hard to send a clear message out.

This was originally down to be screened in the week that the British sailors were being held after being captured supposedly in Iranian waters. Channel 4 folded under pressure and pulled the screening because it was said it may "inflame" the situation and make it harder for the UK to find a democratic solution. I'm not sure if this was true (as it turned out they were actually released on the day this was postponed) because it was only ever going to be watched by a million or two if that, plus the story was already contrasting obviously with footage of how the US and UK treated prisoners (which I assume was why Iran made such a big show of how they hold our prisoners).

Anyway, although it is stated up front that this is a work of fiction, it is clear that it has been very well researched because it does strike home as very convincing. This is most evident in the first half as the squaddies patrol the Basra streets, innocence is lost, violence is sudden and the soldiers react in different ways. This much is very well done and the script rings true. The main scene of action is really well delivered and it is well used as it folds into the changes in the characters and what they end up doing. This is rather lost near the end where I wasn't sold on it. Suddenly the script becomes clunky with characters speaking in "moral arguments" and speeches rather than sounding like real people. This also coincides with the narrative becoming weaker as well.

To me this occurred where we went too much into the court case and had too much said that didn't need to be said. It would have been better to have had a much more subtle touch but it doesn't manage it. It is a shame and not even the performances of the lead two can totally convince in these later stages. This is saying something though because I thought the cast was mostly very good, with particular credit being owed to Kearns and McNulty. Gregory and Dooley are also strong and it is only some of the actors playing the brass who are a bit weaker.

Despite the flaws associated with the final third, the film is actually very strong and convincingly written and delivered.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for The Mark of Cain (2007)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Vampires? Cain? Dumbass? mark_s_maynard_2005
Shaun Dooley roj_mar
im confused....big surpise jasonkeithpolk
British drama at its best jasonkeithpolk
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
In the Valley of Elah Across the Universe Cross of Iron Shock Big Fish
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
IMDb Drama section IMDb UK section Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.