The Genius Club (2006) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
128 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"What can you say about a society that says God is dead and Elvis is alive?"
HardSteelMill15 December 2014
"A criminal threatens to destroy Washington, D.C. with a nuclear bomb unless seven people with 200+ IQs can solve all the world's problems in one night." How's that for the premise of a Christian film? It sure beats "A pop star struggles with her faith," or "A man must convince his brother-in-law of the importance of Christ in the Christmas season." A lot of people, including many Christians, dislike Christian films because:

1. They tend to be lower-budget and lower-quality, cinematically speaking, then most other films.

2. In an attempt to be "family friendly" and "wholesome," they often avoid or trivialize serious issues.

While "The Genius Club" can't overcome the first criticism, it seems as if the filmmakers recognized the second criticism, and decided to make a film that does nothing but address serious issues. Welcome to a Christian film that is not family-friendly. I can't think of a single other Christian film where characters make statements like, "Cancer hasn't been cured because that would mean the loss of millions of jobs in a booming health care industry."

"Solving the world's problems" takes the form of a debate between the seven genius characters and the villain. As time goes on, the stakes get higher, and they go from talking about things like politics and war to things like good and evil. As long as the debate is going on, which is most of the film, the dialogue is pretty well-thought-out and covers deep ground (it slacks off during the breaks, though). You might expect a character to make a statement implying that all the world's problems would be solved if everyone became Christians, but that does not happen. Instead, the film's thesis seems to be that we need to let of greed, let go of hate, and love one another. One of the seven is a seminary student and another is an atheist, and there is some debate about God, Jesus, and religion, but it is not antagonistic like in, say, "God's Not Dead," since the seven characters are seen as working together against a common adversary. Actually, the villain here is a more reasonable and rational character than the professor in "God's Not Dead."

Overall, I enjoyed "The Genius Club" as much as I enjoy movies that I would normally give an "8," but I have to give it a "7" instead, since some of the dialogue and acting was very unconvincing, especially towards the very beginning and the very end. Even so, I consider it one of the better Christian films I have seen, as it has meatier and more mature content than most others. I recommend it to people who are open- minded about Christianity and, for that matter, budgets.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I know who I am
Lele31 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The movie was interesting. Far from perfection: mediocre acting, too long, lack of fluency.

Anyway it is interesting. I know who or what I am: a being who was born, is living, procreated and then will die.

Many people are convinced then there is always an "after" and a "before" because the whole human experience seems to prove this. To me is just a men-centered point of view: we come from nowhere and we end in the same way. Many other people cannot deal with this because they think it is reductive and then they believe in gods who built a human centered universe. ALL religions have to cope with things who go wrong, so they invented EVIL.

Evil is a human invention, just like Good and ethics.

Another idea shared by many people is that all questions have an answer. This is not true. Not necessarily true.

Who am I? What am I doing here? Where do I come from? Where will I go after death? Maybe there is no answer.

God existence. God DO exist. If not what are we talking about? Santa Claus exists too. If not, what are children waiting for on Christmas Eve. Numbers DO exist because I use them to count.

Atheism, at least MY own kind of, does not deny gods. All gods exist. From Christian gods to Muslim's to Hindu's etc. People are not crazy!

I don't BELIEVE that gods' existence can affect MY existence in some way. I do not believe that I have a soul that will survive after my death. I DON'T want a thing like. I want to DIE forever.

People are more than 7 billion. World is inherently chaotic and future is unpredictable: who could have predicted European Union in 1945? And Communism fall in the 90s?

After all the main them of the movie is correct: there is no answer.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I gave this movie 6/10, but not because it deserves it
katie-903-46739721 November 2010
This has to have been the most poorly acted, poorly constructed movies I have seen in my life, HOWEVER.. I was so absorbed by how bad this movie was, that I've now just watched it a second time for laughs. The script is atrocious, basically written for children ( even that's insulting this latest generation), or people who have never seen a movie before.

I did enjoy the questions, although they weren't radical or revolutionary, and for the uninitiated, I'm glad you've had the chance to have been asked these *new* questions.

If you find the questions new and interesting, you should start taking a closer look into politics, and world events.

There are no spoilers in here, except for those who were expecting a good film. But if you are intelligent, and like a drink or two with your mates, put it on and have a jolly good belly laugh!

6/10 for tragic.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very smart thriller with flaws.
bellquest0828 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I had the privilege to see this film before anyone else did at a KLTY radio promotion giveaway. The actors, Stephen Baldwin, Paula Jai Parker and others were in the audience with the director Tim Chey and 2 producers.

This is a well written & well acted thriller, but you must suspend your expectations about how plausible it is, cuz it ain't, and how the true genius, a well educated person could have easily blown up the city long ago is well…not realistic.

However, the credibility of this film grows as the evening wears on – I actually felt like I was sitting with these geniuses deducing and trying to find answers. In the end, most of the people around me were in tears which caught me off guard.

Although the title of the movie (explained during the course of it for better understanding by the masses) is already potent in itself, something like "The World is Stupid" might have prevented it from prematurely disappearing from the (big) screens. And undeservedly too. For if you think only Grisham can make you believe the long-reaching arm of the law is usually equipped with a deadly weapon, you need to see this movie to really find out what an excellent legal suspense is all about. Helped by a masterfully wrought script that will slowly gripe your tripe, Tom Sizemore single-handedly carries it from start to finish in an Oscar- deserving fashion. Enjoy the puzzles, the world issues, the macabre, and Jack Scalia who plays the best president yet to hit a silver screen. And don't forget any of the clues en route or there will be holes in your puzzle when you're done.

I highly recommend the film for no other reason than the world is insane and no human being can solve it.
50 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Complete garbage. Don't even waste your time.
thatguy-236 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I was absolutely stunned at how horrible this movie is. It's a joke, and I hope it didn't cost them more than a couple thousand dollars by the time they hit post production... anything more would just be wasting money.

Another incredible thing, to me, is the total lack of reporting on how bad it is here on IMDb. I'm not sure why no one has bothered to warn others not to waste their time, but I'm changing that.

*Synopsis Spoiler:*

The first serious problem with this movie is that the basic premise is horrible - all the "geniuses" (anyone with a recorded extremely high IQ.... just never mind the fact that the IQ scale is not agreed upon and changes from test to test, society to society, etc.) in the U.S. are gathered at the request of an H-Bomb threatening terrorist, who is also (supposedly) one of the highest IQ holders. He claims that if they cannot adequately give him input he feels is... good? (basically, whatever he wants to hear) on how to solve the world's problems by a certain time, he'll set off the bomb.

Okay, so you supposedly have 11 (I forget exactly how many) geniuses sitting around a low budget movie table chatting about "the world's problems."

Hello script writer, I hope you're a genius with the experiences of 11 different geniuses to help you form your characters or this is going to quickly turn to... oh wait... there it goes, into the toilet! Kerplunk! That's pretty much how it goes... an idiot writer in some sort of stoner haze apparently thought it'd be cool if we got all our "geniuses" together to solve world problems, but obviously has a complete lack of real information on any of the (as perceived by this unbelievable writer) "world's problems." (That is, if it wasn't apparent that the movie is based on the idea that there are people in the world that could easily solve the "world's problems," such as cancer - if they just took the time to do it! Hahahahha. What a joke!)

The second reason this movie fails to be even entertaining on a comedic level is the sheer stupidity of the responses of the so-called geniuses. Repeatedly, the geniuses respond to the terrorist's questions (mostly all variants of the underlying question that suddenly staggers itself awkwardly into view near the end of the movie, "Why is the world so horrible, immoral and unchristian?") with answers that you could, and I mean this seriously which is why it is so sad, expect to find in YouTube comments for a Michael Moore movie. Misinformation, underdog fever, etc. It's disgusting how brainwashed people are into believing they're part of some revolutionary, open-minded thinking, when it's really just ignorant mob mentality.

Finally, I've read a few of the other comments posted here and suspect that maybe they are the reason no one has bothered to mention how unbelievably horrible this movie is. I don't really care what those people have to say, and I'm not going to argue any points on here - if there are any good points made by this movie, they are so incredibly muddled and buried in **** that it doesn't even matter. I am not going to respond to comments claiming that somewhere in this sewer there's a gold nugget... you're welcome to dig all you want, though.

Later.
25 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
horrible movie, just awful
tomsan842 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
My friend and I met up for our weekly movie night, but we were all out of movies (from our stock). So we decided to rent one, first time since 4 years or so.. after looking up some movies we decided to watch 'the genius club' I was in the mood for a dialog based movie and the description appealed to me, in short it seemed like a save choice.. Oh how I was wrong.

This is most likely the worst most pretentious pseudo religious based movie I have ever seen. It devours mission to mars. which was the previous 'worst movie ever' award holder.

This movie was utter garbage, there was really no moment in the whole movie I felt any connection or emotion.

Acting was horrible, not merely because of the bad actors but also because of awful script. Some scenes were just toe curling. I literally ate a part of my self. The story in general was just nonsense, the whole point system was ridiculous. My friend wanted to turn the movie off, but I was hoping for something totally random, funny "things" to occur because frankly all my hopes for a good story were gone as well. we sat through the whole movie, but I regretted it afterward.

when the horror was over I immediately went to IMDb to see its grade, how the frig does this earn a 5.5??? that's insane. Some comments are definitely not made by morons and they praise it like there is no tomorrow. unbelievable. people who seriously praise this movie cannot be sincere. please tell HOW is this good acting/scripting/etc etc???? My question once more.. How can IMDb rate this as a 5.5?? That's disgustingly high. well written/described comments are insane. How can a person, who is obviously not retarded, say such words? is the rumor true? Do film companies post positive feedback on IMDb? I gave it a 1 and that is not to downsize the grade, it is because it is not worth any higher. Horrible horrible movie, don't watch
24 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Required Viewing
peterhaily13 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The archetypal 'thriller' film, The Genius Club is also one of the richest thinking-man works to come to the screen.

Each of its characters is extraordinarily realized; each has his or her own arc, his or her own vital part to play in the film's slow progression towards its dramatic finale. Typically, most great filmmakers put the film together using an exceeding degree of artistry; each and every shot, each action sequence, is exquisitely composed; and this is true with this film. Nothing seems contrived or out-of-place within the overall 'Genius Table'. Everything is beautifully conceived and in focus, both literally and figuratively.

The questions that are asked are:

1) Every war is a meaningless waste of life; 2) Why is there world hunger? 3) Does the media control our thought-processes? 4) Why does toner ink cost so much? 5) Is Capitalism and Communism essentially the same? 6) Why is there suffering? 7) Does God exist?

What's interesting and remarkable is how the questions are set up and seeded for the final one, namely, does God exist?

And thus the works of the past philosophers comes into play as well as the religious aspects (which I suspect has caused some critics to hate this film). But the profound thing about the final discussion among these geniuses is how they do in fact attempt to prove God's existence. Surely no one can deny that a 'moral conscience' is what has driven many atheists on a cold night to believe in God.

All aspects in this film work perfectly: acting, directing, art direction, costume design, cinematography, editing, sound, everything

I can only say that your patience with this film will probably be well rewarded if you take the time to give it multiple viewings. The filmmaker is most definitely not a socialist, unless I'm mis-reading him wildly. The film is most definitely Christian in tone and perhaps too evangelical for most people's taste. But I respect the filmmakers for not giving in to the 'group think' mentality that most movies finally succumb to. The sad thing is, I just can't see a project like this ever coming out of the Hollywood studio system, where art is just another commodity and marketing is the new god.
37 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A waste of 2 hours
thumper33128 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This film is utter garbage. The dialog is awful, the acting is over dramatic and predictable and there is no plot. They basically just sit around and talk about all the terrible things and people in the world. This is exactly the type of film I would expect if Michael Moore decided to direct a 'suspense' movie. Half the time they got points for just spewing a bunch of politically correct verbal diarrhea rather than actually answering the so called questions.

Biggest boos to the idiot who was in charge of the music. Background music seemed to just appear for no reason at random points in the movie, the music didn't even fit the moment and seemed totally out of place. It would be easy to pick apart all the ridiculous holes in this movie but that would almost be as much a waste of time as watching the movie in the first place. Don't waste your time on this turkey, it's basically a B movie with a couple of semi well known actors. 2 out of 10.
20 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A dark journey through an existentialist nightmare
arthursolomon716 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Well for starters the movie was brilliant. If you haven't seen Following, his first film, stop reading and go do it now.

SideNote: The biggest complaint my friends had about the film is that they couldn't grasp the multitude of questions and puzzles that occur in the movie. These are key to understanding the plot and the motivations and mind-set of Armand. I didn't have any difficulty in this area, perhaps because I am described as observant and attentive. By the time the third shift happened, I was ready for it, and by the end of the movie, was relishing each shift in questions. In case its not obvious, if you can't handle these shifts, you will not do well in understanding the movie. :End SideNote

I watched it the second time VERY closely and after a while of thinking my and my friend thought we had worked it all out!

But now i'm not sure, after reading some of the reviews for this i'm not sure if what I thought is really what happened, so i'm left thinking i need 2 c it again.

POSSIBLE SPOILERS:

There are many questions to be answered in this film as you watch it you get the answers.

Is Armand truly a terrorist in the classical sense or simply misguided? Does he purposefully manipulate the ending? Did he really want the geniuses to discover the 3 word password? Was there another password combination to the bomb? Was the final answer worthy of 30 points?

SPOILERS ENDS HERE

Overall Opinion:

All in all this is probably the best film I've seen. It ain't got the big Hollywood celebrities, it ain't got a big budget or a world famous director.

The Genius Club proves that you don't need millions upon millions to produce a masterpiece of an exciting and entertaining film. All you need, is originality, a good technique to tell the story and good acting, plots and twists.

I give it 8 out 10.
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Religious garbage
david-limperes24 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I wish they had had 1 genius on hand to help write this excruciating mangling of a pretty good premise and talented cast. The questions were only exceeded in stupidity by the answers. I rolled my eyes that these "geniuses" didn't seem to know the basics of their own field of expertise - an economics professor who is unaware that there is a mathematical proof that it is impossible to build a computer that never crashes, and a cancer researcher ignorant of the theory of evolution, to name two. I think the final answer was pretty good, which is why I blame the writing; the whole movie is an intellectual exercise. Didn't they think intellectuals would be watching? I'm particularly offended that the writers assume it's self-evident that religion is the solution, rather than the cause, of most of the world's problems.
17 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Right on the mark on certain issues
foothillman31811 October 2008
A lot of people like the film who've I've spoken with. The film came out on DVD a couple weeks ago and it's right on the money on certain issues like gas prices and Wall Street.

Who could have imagined the chaos we are in these days? But this film really nails on the topics of greed and lack of human decency. It's almost scary reading the attacks on this film but then you realize the critics keep neglecting (or purposefully) exclude what the central point of the film: God.

All the other issues take a back seat to God. And that's what the film is driving at.

We're living in age where people would rather glamorize a serial killer film than give props to a film that attempts to prove God exists.
41 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This was awful
rosscavins29 August 2008
Granted, I could only get through 12 minutes of the movie but all facets of the movie were amateurish.

The writing was trite and the dialogue was forced. There was no flow.

The acting was atrocious, in part at times even from Billy Baldwin and Michael Madsen, two "name" actors.

The sound was spotty and I kept thinking I would see the boom mic at any time.

To sum up the movie in one scene, 10 minutes in: The Homeland Security guy finds the nuclear bomb that Madsen's character has set up to detonate. The guy pulls the core out, looks inside, and says, "It's U-235." He had no geiger counter or any kind of measurement device to verify this. My best guess is that the U-235 was clearly marked with an easy-to-read label stating "Caution: U-235." I actually expected the director to cut to the label just to prove to us it was a real nuke.

Bad movie without any aspect of it worth bragging on. These people on here who say they're movie buffs and give this movie a high rating have no idea what a good movie is. It's more than content. It takes good acting, camera-work, lighting, sound-work, writing, music score and directing.

Sadly, this movie contained none of the above criteria except maybe lighting.
19 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cast is phenomenal!
EricCampbell13 January 2012
The cast in this movie is sensational!! With memorable characters and excellent music, this is a great piece of work.

It's about these 7 geniuses who are forced to solve the world's problems in one night.

Disregarding that each character is a stereotype, the movie is entirely realistic and is an eye-opening look at the emotions and impact that a social life or a cruel mistreated life takes on these geniuses.

They reveal their deepest secrets, and learn about themselves in the process Original and insightful, with a large cult following that it deserves

100000000000000000000000000000 kudos!
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Being a genius takes very little these days
kechupydeath9 October 2008
This whole movie was made to make people aware of the world's problems. I can admire that, but there's one catch. Every theory in this movie is wrong. The so called "geniuses" have no knowledge about even the basic of science or no understanding of how the world works. It cannot enlighten you to, as it's supposed to do, it can only through you deeper into the dark with ignorant debates on religion, medicine, economy and politics.

The only spark of genius this movie had was implementing 2nd grade riddles into the story. The answers are banal yet the geniuses take their time to answer and not all of them even can. By this movie's standards of "genius", 3 quarters of the planet's population should be deemed masterminds of knowledge and everything else.

As a standalone movie with a horribly stupid script it's pretty good. If you like bad acting, bad cinematography, bad editing, bad plots, bad light effects, bad characters, pathetic flashbacks and cozy dumb endings then this movie's for you.
18 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
OMG u people that cried must love horrible acting!
jlird8087 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't know that movies this bad were still being made. I actually chewed out my neighbor a little for renting and bringing this movie over to my place and suggesting we watch it.

I've worked with high IQ individuals in the past in the Los Angeles area and these annoying actors had no resemblance. Intelligent and brilliant individuals do not behave, act, or speak this way. They definitely couldn't sit through this movie...

Poor acting...poor script writing and "common sense" ideas portrayed as "deep thoughts"! I had to laugh...

How annoying and cliché....if u felt an emotional response to this film ur mind is miring somewhere in the mud of mental "mediocrity".
18 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
sometimes confusing but very good
cliftonpana3 February 2009
Now I'll admit I'm not the biggest Tom Sizemore fan in the world, although he has been in two great films that I have seen, Black Hawk Down... and this. The Genius Club is a very enjoyable and involving drama, with many excellent turns from it's cast.

This was a movie that I was glued to and the time flew by, because it seems like you go on a 'journey' with this character and you end up at the end in time to look back on it and think 'Wow, so that's what it was about' or 'That's what that meant'.

The cinematography is quite beautiful, I like the earthly colours of the basement photos and Sizemore's apartment, so suggestive of steadiness, calm and control, contrasting nicely with the turmoil of Sizemore's characters inner life.

The ending with the death speech is downright cheesy and disappointed me. This film doesn't need such cheap trickery to make its point.

On the whole, well worth watching but parts of it are a bit too Hollywood.

A solid 8 out of 10 for me.
28 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Woeful Religious Film disguised as Thriller
brocdsl24 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I just thought I had to post to make it clear to people this is a movie with a religious agenda. Nothing particularly wrong with that but it's somewhat insidious to hide the fact. The well known cast helped to fool me as well as the description of the film. I thought it might be an intelligent well thought out story like The Man From Earth but I was way of the mark.

There are some ideas and thoughts expressed throughout that I would certainly agree with but as it moves into the final third we suddenly start to hear more from the "Does God Exist" apologetics approach. It's a major flaw in a film when it involved a group of so called-genius' who let seriously flawed arguments pass them by and mostly only when it is the seriously flawed arguments of the religious genius.

He spouts a typically poor argument at one point to the token disbeliever who says he refuses to believe in the unknown. Something along the lines of

"Do you know who built this building? - No" "Do you know if it is up to spec? - No" "Do you know if it is structurally sound? - No" "Thats an awful lot of belief in the unknown."

Cue smug grins all round. I can almost hear the Director's satisfaction. This kind of moment was the whole reason for the movie. This religious genius is played by the only non-actor in the bunch. Apparently he is the son of the guy who funded the movie both of them Christians.

My problem here is an atheist would surely pipe up, especially if he was a genius, and say he could soon find out the answer to all those questions if necessary but a virtual lifetime of seeing buildings not fall down is pretty damning and comforting if we seriously fear it's structural integrity.

I would expect the Director is extremely proud of a supposed entertainment of both sides of the "Does God Exist" argument blissfully ignoring the fact that the atheist side is only there so the clever Christian answers can be thrown out to the satisfaction of us all. We are not allowed any counter-argument here.

Another classic is the scientist genius who believes in God. Given one minute to prove God exists she talks about how amazing it is that the earth is positioned so that we won't burn to death or freeze to death depending on the earths angle toward or away from the sun, how so many exact factors came in to play to produce life, humanity, how we became sentient and so on. Sounds good but as soon as we can travel throughout the galaxy I'd love to have the chance of taking the Director on a whistle stop tour of an infinite universe where something like this was bound to happen at least once and show him all the planets where it didn't happen.

The final message is one of forgiveness and letting go of hate two things I have always felt strongly about and two things I think all human beings need to learn to do but I want them to learn to do it on their own. Why should we need God to do that? Not once is religion mentioned in this movie as being the cause of untold amounts of suffering in it's name. The idea that humanity has learned or can learn to forgive through God is a fallacy proved throughout history.

The movie needlessly perpetuates the idea that we can't be strong on our own. We need a crutch. That crutch is God. I can't help thinking it could have achieved so much more without this agenda. Go watch the Man from Earth if you really want food for thought.
14 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This will make you cry….
caltechwomanalways4 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I cried at the end of this movie – twice. The first was when the cancer victim (Helfer) began her monologue about dying (which shook me to the soul); and then, when I thought it was over, I got touched again by Stephen Baldwin's performance when he talks about his mother who died. Incredibly moving performances. It kind of reminded me of 'Dead Poet's Society' in that every scene builds to the climatic end. My friend saw this film 5 times (which is insane). After the 5th time, you become numb to any film. But I see lots of films and this is one of the great surreptitious movies (does anyone remember 'Guarding Tess'?) that gradually builds an audience through word of mouth. A solid 8.5 overall.
45 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolute Tripe
fatdaz10 October 2008
I wouldn't normally feel the need to comment online about a movie. But this film is terrible in every way possible. I feel like someone stole 2 hours of my life..

How on earth is any intelligent person supposed to believe for even 1 second that these people are ABOVE genius in IQ with the lines they have to deliver. The script is truly awful. Its clearly created by some one with no real grasp of the problems facing planet earth, no idea about politics, not a shred of understanding in the area of economics, in short its dumb and clumsy. It's only real aim is to voice the opinion that our only salvation is through GOD. And even the religious ideas in this film are put across in a child like way.

Baldwins atheist 'genius' character cant even come up with one good argument to prove GOD is imaginary in response to the religious 'genius' arguments for the existence of GOD. Well what would expect in a film made by Christians. Balance? no chance.

This movie is garbage, I didn't think it would be great but I expected more than this. And the so called movie buffs here obviously work for the film company who made this or are as dumb as this film.

This thinly veiled pseudo religious hogwash should be avoid at all costs.
17 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Do not read if your IQ's below 200
mues-lee7 October 2008
While I am neither an expert of movie mechanics nor of the so-called art of acting, there are a few points worth sharing to this piece of work:

  • This movie may be viewed as dumbed-down pseudo-dramatic - or as brilliantly mocking the 'intense thrillers' of our dear Hollywood time and age. - The questions the movie concerns itself may appear to be a bit huge to fit into our daily lives, and the answers may seem to be the most radical ones (or the most normal, depending on your point of view and degree of thinking). There is, however, no doubt that a thinking mind must come across both question and answer as portrayed here. - This movie will hurt, if you choose to see it with open eyes. Since most people prefer feeling decently dazed to seeing the truth, this will not be a popular movie. - Hopefully, I am wrong about the previous point. I would justify my hopes for us as a human race.


Oh, and - you really don't have to be a genius to get this movie: Think for yourself. Few messages in this world are as beautiful as this.
39 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What kind of people might all politicians be if all great geniuses are this kind of morons?
kappas-114 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
THIS COMMENT INCLUDES LOTS OF SPOILERS!

Actually most of all elements in that movie goes straight down to the gutter and only reason I recommend you to watch this film is that after you've seen it, you're going to feel yourself as a wisdom of all solutions for all problems in the whole wide world. But not because this movie promotes you rather it makes you see yourself a greater genius than those filmmakers.

First of all, this movie might be one of S. Baldwins stupidest choices in his filmography. If not counting Flintstones... I mean, acting was horrible all the way (including news anchors on the screen!). Sizemore is overacting (maybe comes along with the name :D). Scalia seems to be lost and lacking total credibility to be an president. And others just try to play along and show out something great and outstanding drama. After all I couldn't care less about personal issues those characters revealed about themselves. I've seen home videos about animals with better drama.

If the writer-directors plan was to show me something radical or tell an attractive message, it all watered down at the latest with dubious flashbacks and low-leveled drama scenes. Lots of time is used for insignificant scenes where most of the dialogue is like: - "What a hell is going on!" - "OK, I'm out a here!" - "You can't do this!" - "You have to do this!" - "We have to do this!" - "We don't have to do this!" ...and so on.

So, dialogue and dramatization was - and I'm not underestimating youth - like made by college-girls/boys or wannabe-director and most of all, if those characters were representing highest IQ's in resident, no wonder USA has its contradictory problems.

Along with the plot, all those "riddles", questions and answers are so obvious and predictable and the whole "truth" is so self-evident and yet characters had huge difficulties to response and make rational conclusions. How's that?

Maybe that's just the general way to recognize and solve problems in our days? But then, where goes that thin red line between stupidity and ingenuity? I mean if people with those rates of IQ behave and response like that, oh my...are they in the very end just bunch of idiots talking to another idiot? You know, it's like those horror-movies, where victim is escaping the murderer up in the attic. You can see there's a rational and obvious solution to avoid death, but still the victim takes that wrong turn just to amuse watchers a bit longer.

Therefore, along watching this movie, I asked myself: What kind of people might all politicians be if the greatest geniuses are this kind of morons...! For interchange you could also watch comedy called "Idiocracy". It might give you more answers about future human race than this film.

Finally the finale with password mystery is just ridiculous. The hero guy don't have even a clue what it might be but...oh wait, surprise, surprise! There it comes! Just out of nowhere! And really not too late. Wow, that was close one...

There is no logical riddle for that password and for an explanation seems to be enough when the guy won't admit to president that he self has the highest IQ in USA. And that's why he solves this kind of crisis.

But now comes the confusing part of this all... Actually, this movie didn't leave me totally out in the cold. It wakes you up to wonder are all those world wide problems and truths after all so self-evident issues? Are modern people that blinded that these things have to bend out of wire? Even if it looks like stupid film? Maybe people along evolution gets more stupid and incompetent to realize where or what is the main cause of world problems. So in other words you can't see it while it rests under your nose.

And maybe there is some kind reverse psychological twist in this movie. I don't know. I'm not a genius.

By the way, what does this fact telling you? -Most of all graceful comments here has been sent from US. On the other hand most of all opposites has been sent outside of US.

Now there's a riddle for you...
13 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Two Cents
fortlauderdale-114 October 2008
First I'll throw in my two cents on an issue I wish I didn't have to comment on. This is a remarkable film for no other reason that it evokes passion. The critics who dislike the film continue to bash only the religious implications. But this is disingenuous. Surely, a film can stand on its merits regardless of whether one believes in God or not.

Movies that toyed with similar themes, like "12 Angry Men" or "Beautiful Mind," though great films, do not come close to packing the emotional wallop this film delivers. I dare anyone to tell me they didn't get teared up as the movie progressed and the characters reveal their own tragedies.

Of course as a realist drama, the performances in the film are crucial. Scalia is outstanding, as one would expect, but so is Tom Sizemore and the rest of the cast. Part of this must be due to the filmmakers, as Scalia, for example, doesn't come across nearly as well to me in some of his other films.

If The Genius Club has a flaw, it's that its relatively short (compared to the material available) running time makes for some unexplained or shallow turnabouts of character in the complex of good/evil interplay. The casino owner seems particularly distant to the viewer, for example, which is appropriate to the final state of her character, but which could have been explained better in transformation. But how wonderful is it to have a casino owner - the ingenuity of bringing the most shallow world and mixing it in with real religion is nothing short of imaginative audacity.

Finally note the contrast between the restrained closing scene (which is also the climax) and the melodramatic style of the almost everything that has preceded it in the film.

This is a fabulous, heartrending film, with grand, biblical and universal subtexts and an unusually developed but extremely charming romance. Unless you're completely averse to realist drama, you must see 'Genius Club' at least once.
37 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Two hours of my life gone forever because of this film
eganehlers14 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Objectively speaking, this was a very bad movie. Your feelings about it may depend on your own IQ, or possibly just your age and level of life experience, but for me, there was nothing— and I mean absolutely nothing—discussed here that was insightful.

The acting is atrocious across the board, completely lacking in nuance. This is particularly true of Tom Sizemore as the villain. This is mainly a problem of writing and direction, since I've seen some of these actors succeed in other roles. But here, working under a relative novice director with little or no time and budget for the multiple takes needed to really nail a performance, they have little chance.

I agree with the commenters who believe the religious aspects of the movie were insulting. The scene where the seminary student baffles Steven Baldwin by suggesting that faith in the structural integrity of a building is equivalent to faith in god is laugh-out-loud funny. That old chestnut of a fallacy wouldn't have baffled a high-school honors student, let alone a genius.

Like other commenters, I agree that ultimately the film was bound to fail, simply because of its agenda. You can't prove god exists. There is no way, in language, science, or philosophy, that it can be done. Recycling discredited bits of medieval philosophy, and also wrapping an Intelligent Design thesis in sheep's clothing can't change that.

If you're one of the many religious people who happen to also be intelligent, I think you'll be annoyed by the film. If someone is going to argue on your side, you want the top dog in there doing it, not the second and third string. A dose of eloquence, and a reluctance to resort to old Sunday school canards, could have made this a really good movie, engaging for religious and non-religious alike. Didn't happen here, though.

Lastly, the film had no arc, no tension, no frisson. It had nothing to do with saving the world, only with saving Washington, D.C., the loss of which some people might not consider a terrible thing. Seriously though, I think the fact that the writer-director here perceives the loss of an American city as the end of the world says more than anything I can about how overblown, ponderous, and egocentric this exercise was. I give the guy credit for his ambition, but he needs some post-grad learning, or at least a heck of a lot of reading, to effectively succeed in his goals. I have to call this an almost total failure.
10 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Turn off your brain if you want to like this movie.
answerswhy2 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
OK, here's the positive: sometimes it's fun to get good and incensed about how awful a movie is. This is that movie.

In short: pathetic writing, laughable dialogue, blatantly terrible editing, clumsy construction and acting so bad it's not even up to Razzie standards. Yeah. That bad. Many other reviewers have pointed out flawed lighting and sound as well as low production values. Those elements didn't particularly bother me, but to be honest I usually don't pay much attention to that kind of thing. The one exception: I spent the first 15 minutes trying not to be continually distracted by what appeared to be a shiny bead of mucus hanging from Baldwin's nose and thinking, when is he going to notice that and wipe it away?? But it turned out to be a tiny nose ring, which better lighting and cinematography could have identified much more clearly right off the bat.

I wanted to like this movie. I tried. Knowing only the title and the most basic plot outline, I was hoping for some truly intelligent writing and dialogue -- since, after all, these people are supposed to be geniuses. I am so, so disappointed. There were moments when I almost thought I saw one of the actors trying to suppress their own inner voice clamoring about how stupid this dialogue was. These people are all supposed to have IQ's over 200 and yet the writing is barely over 100. I could go on for days about the holes in the story, the holes in the characters' dialogue and logic, the holes in the flow of ideas... the only good thing about this film is the premise, but it completely and utterly fails to live up to the ideas it purports to present. There were many times when I wanted to jump in and yell an appropriate response to some question that supposedly stymied this group of the "best minds in the country" -- how is a viewer supposed to accept that none of these geniuses could come up with a reasonable argument when it isn't stumping the audience even for a heartbeat? And I'm not just talking about the grade-school level riddles, either, which are laughable. What arguments the characters do present are so tragically flawed the viewer can't even get carried along on the emotion train -- they'll be too busy rolling their eyes.

The film eventually gets around to its ultimate purpose when the question of the existence of God finally comes up -- but unfortunately, instead of a stimulating debate with intelligent questions and rejoinders from both sides, we are treated to the same old flawed arguments you can find on any internet forum, and which are full of holes any one with a bit of sense would be able to drive a truck through. Do the geniuses point out these flaws and errors in logic? Nope, they just collapse into stymied silence. Because the movie itself doesn't actually want to search for the truth -- they only want you to look at the filmmakers' version of the truth. OK, if belief in God is the story you want to tell, that's fine -- but don't do it in such a way that even Christian apologists would disown you for your idiocy.

The psychopath in charge of this whole charade jumps from question to question without any discernible reasoning and awards points for answers in a completely arbitrary manner (which I can sort of understand since the very nature of a psychopath means their behavior is bound to be somewhat bizarre). The problem is, the movie makers should have understood the effect this would have on the viewer: we completely lose interest in the points system because it can't be predicted in any way. And the geniuses don't seem to object to this arbitrariness at all. I kept hoping one of them would be smart enough to call out this psychopath on all of his BS, but alas.... bad writing strikes again. And the viewer is left out in the cold.

Some of the acting is OK. Much of it is really, really not. I buy Sizemore as the bad guy, and I appreciate that his character even has some humanity beneath the black hole of his psychopathic rage. I even buy Baldwin as the disillusioned pizza guy whose genius has already brought him so deeply into cynicism that he doesn't even see the point of making anything more of his life. Baldwin's performance is pretty bland, but it's at least believably bland. But some of the other actors... oy. Particularly bad is Huntley Ritter, whose "schmacting" just made me want to bang my head on the wall. It makes me sad to say this, but I've seen more believability from high school productions.

Editing: also bad. Between scenes, short clips are occasionally inserted where absolutely nothing happens: like a meaningless, emotionless shot of, what was it? Could have been a man tying his shoelace -- I can't even remember, because the shot did absolutely nothing to move the story along and it made me think, what in the world was that? It honestly looked like something they had marked for the cutting room floor but actually forgot to delete. That happened more than once. The flow of the story is discordant: moments for which you would expect some kind of resolution get cut short and you're abruptly yanked into the next scene without any kind of aesthetic grace.

The only part of this movie's message that made any sense to me is the idea that until we, as individuals, look at our true selves first and learn to forgive people who have hurt us, the world's problems will never get better. That much, at least, is true in my opinion. So I guess the task that lies ahead for me is learning to forgive the filmmakers for this piece of sludgy, ill-written, ill-presented propaganda-ist schlock.
11 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
very original story....
deluxewamu22 December 2006
The Genius Club definitely will not bore you. By far the most engrossing movie I've ever watched. I saw this on the big screen in Dallas and throughout most of this masterpiece I kept asking myself, "where is this movie going?"

I was looking over my shoulder and racking my brain throughout this movie trying to figure out how the game always managed to stay one step ahead of Tom Sizemore's character. Okay, so it asks you to accept some pretty wild premises and some fairly insane leaps of logic. Okay, so after you think about it, the suspense really has no sensible roots. The bottom line is that this movie is fun to watch.

For 2 hours The Genius Club takes your mind and twists it ruthlessly, contorting it in any way it so desires. Maybe this is why some didn't like it - the debates on the issues remains steady until the Bible student and the atheist (played marvelously by Stephen Baldwin) go head to head. As a Christian, I don't find it odd that people hate this film, even though it simply has a Christian character (they can't even allow 1 Christian character in a film without going berserk).

Jack Scalia is the perfect actor for this role, he played the President flawlessly. I love this movie, it's definitely going to turn heads when it comes out on DVD later.
51 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed