User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
A lesson in the obvious
swerning19 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
To be honest, I'm not sure that the world is better off saving some of the kids on "Honey, We're KILLING the Kids!". Some of the featured children make an effort, and maybe there is hope for them, but more often you wind up hating the kids and their parents and secretly rooting for them to fail. The show is about parents who are too dim-witted to realize that they need to spend time with their kids, too weak to stand up to their eight-year-olds, and too stupid to know that pizza can be unhealthy. It is also about fat whiny kids who cry, cry, cry when they are asked to eat spinach or (gasp!) swim for THIRTY WHOLE SECONDS! The first episode I watched followed Patrick and Deisree and their parents. Everyone was SHOCKED that the kids were overweight and unhealthy, SHOCKED that five hours of TV was too much each day, SHOCKED that the kids missed their dad who apparently worked all day and all night, SHOCKED that morbid obesity is dangerous for a ten-year-old. So by the fifth time that Patrick was crying about some food or minor exercise task, I was annoyed.

I understand that sometimes it's hard to see how bad things are when you're right in a situation, but come on. Who can't stand up to their kids? Who feels uncomfortable saying no to a bitchy 10 or 12 year old? Grr.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A good idea
TheBlackVoodoo1 October 2005
Although I feel a little sad writing a review for this programme, never mind even looking it up, I just wanted to say how glad I am that it was made. People who say this kind of programme is stupid obviously haven't seen it or think it makes them uncool if they do. This is ridiculous. Even "Wife Swap", a similar programme, has lifestyle benefits. Seeing a middle aged woman who obsessively cleans and nags non-stop, or who is prejudiced towards people who don't have a big house, 3 cars and white sofas do a complete u-turn to become a woman who is more open minded and craves more from life, produces quite a pleasing feeling. In "Honey..." the parents of children who are overweight or have potentially damaging dietary habits, see a picture of their children progress from their age now to age 40 based on tests done on them by the show's people. The visual results are more often than not shockingly hideous for a parent to behold (yet ironically usually almost a mirror of the parents) They are then spurred on to change their kid's futures for the better. They are usually successful. I think this programme is a good idea because its a public way of making the masses think more about their children and the damaging and beneficial effects of food. I don't think we should go over the top with making lots of programmes in this area, the best things would be for parents to actually do it themselves and pass those skills and knowledge on through the generations, without shock tactics. But hey, its a start.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad eating = bad hair, makeup, & wardrobe
cherab15 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The moral of this show is that bad eating habits give people bad hair, bad taste in clothes, bad posture, bad jobs, and on and on. They are obviously miserable and loathe themselves. However, if they learn to eat broccoli, they will be wealthy, successful, and attractive.

TLC ought to be ashamed of themselves for this blatant exploitation of parental fears and guilt. If nutrition is really that important, they should be able to develop a show using honest and truthful methods. If they really believed in their computer simulations, I'd like to see them do a double-blind test by finding some 40-year-olds, finding out what their eating and exercise habits were as children, and age-progressing the kids' photos. Then compare to the real things. Hey, that sounds like a project for Mythbusters! Discovery Channel--are you listening?

TLC must stand for Tabloid Lies and Cons.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I hate these types of shows
mid31612 December 2006
Last time I checked, the Nazis didn't win the second world war - not that you'd sodding notice. After all, the Third Reich was pretty big on issuing orders and demanding cold, robotic obedience from the populace, and that's pretty much what we're saddled with today. But the way the orders are delivered has changed. Instead of being barked at in a German accent through a loudhailer, they're disguised as concerned expert advice and floated under your nose every time you switch on the TV or flip open a newspaper There's a continual background hum, a middle-class message of self-improvement, whispered on the wind.

"You eat too much. You eat the wrong things. You drink. You smoke. You don't get enough exercise. You probably can't even *beep* properly. You'll die if you don't change your ways. Your health will suffer. Have you got no self-respect? Look at you. You sicken me. I pity you. I hate you. We all hate you. God hates you. Don't you get it? It's so sad, what you're doing to yourself. It's just so bloody sad." That's the mantra. And it goes without saying that the people reciting it are routinely depicted as saints. Last year, the media dropped to its knees to give Jamie Oliver a collective blow job over his School Dinners series, in which he campaigned to get healthier food put on school menus. Given the back-slapping reaction, you'd be forgiven for thinking he'd personally rescued 5,000 children from the jaws of a slavering paedophile.

Anyway, the series was a huge success. In fact in telly terms there was only one real drawback: it wasn't returnable. After all, when you've saved every child in the nation from certain death once, you can't really do it a second time. The only solution is to find a new threat, which brings us to Ian Wright's Unfit Kids (Wed, 9pm, C4), a weekly "issuetainment" programme in which the former footballer and renowned enemy of grammar forces a bunch of overweight youngsters to take part in some extra-curricular PE.

It's essentially a carbon copy of the Jamie Oliver show, with more sweating and fewer shots of pupils mashing fresh basil with a pestle: an uplifting fable in which Wrighty shapes his gang of misfits into a lean, mean, exercising' machine - combating apathy and lethargy, confronting lazy parents, and attempting to turn the whole thing into a nationwide issue that'll have Range Rover mums everywhere dampening their knickers with sheer sanctimony in between trips to the Conran shop. Oh isn't it simply terrible, what these blob-some plebes do to themselves? Not our Josh you understand: he eats nothing but organic spinach and attends lacrosse practise six hundred times a week.

Bet he does, the little sh1t yes, it is heartwarming to watch flabby, inconvenient kids transforming themselves with a bit of simple activity... but there's something about the underlying eat-your-greens message that really sticks in my craw, in case you hadn't guessed.

What happened to the concept of CHOICE, you *beep* So a bit of jogging might increase your life expectancy - so what? That just equates to a few more years in the nursing home - whoopee do. And besides, I'd rather drop dead tomorrow than spend the rest of my life sharing a planet with a bunch of smug toss ends trying to out-health one another.

In episode two, video games and the internet are singled out as villains in the war on flab: they make kids too sedentary, you see. Oddly enough, TV, which is equally sedentary, and unlike those two activities, actively encourages you to let your mind atrophy along with your physique, escapes without a rollicking. Funny that.

Well listen here, Channel 4 - instead of forcing kids to eat bracken or do squat-thrusts, how about teaching them to think more expansively, so they reject the sly, cajoling nature of programmes like this? Or would that be a campaign too far?
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad parenting can be made even worse and this show proves it
wildeyedredhead14 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
OMG I just watched this show for the first time thinking it may be informational and at least entertaining. It was just sad. It began with terrible parents being scared into even worse at the behest of a nutritionist. As far as advertised, the woman had no education or experience in child behavior or psychology, and certainly didn't seem to have any throughout the show.

The most distressing part was when they forced a child to eat when he was gagging on the food... pushed him to continue until he vomited. This is not good parenting and certainly not healthy.

They judge the children's future health based on 40 year old computer aged photos... how could anyone possibly judge health in a photo? Most telling of all, was the hair styles in the b4 pics... bad eating habits in youth apparently means bad haircuts and gray hair at age 40. But, how else can you show health? Oh yes, they also had bad oral hygiene... no wait that was the eating too. And apparently braces are only for the healthy eaters.

This show was really not for anyone who likes children. It is too disturbing to see the abuse they go through. And one has to wonder if its only rotten parents who even try to get on these shows, or if it makes for better "entertainment" I guess if they were really like most of us, why would we watch, we could just look in a mirror. We like to see people who make us look good. But, I just couldn't bear to see the way those kids were treated throughout the show. I can't understand why child services doesn't intervene... I really don't understand a society that allows abusing children pass for entertainment.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absurd and alarmist Daily Mail-esquire shock treatment
The Spectacular Spider-Man14 December 2005
This is a real TV show shown in the UK (BBC 1 tonite, actually). And it's hysterically alarmist.

The set-up is simple. Two parents are taken into a big room where the show's presenter, some psychologist woman, tells them their kids are too fat/lazy/unhealthy, and eat/smoke/watch TV too much. Then she shows them a CGI animation of their kids - and what they will look like when they are 40. Which, as you'd expect, is hideous, and even their expressions are angry and sad.

The psychologist lady then says, "You're KILLING your kids." At which point, the mother usually brakes down in tears.

Seriously, this is a real show.

The kids then come in, AFTER the scary future pics of them are gone, and the family are given instructions as to what to do over the next three weeks to SAVE THEIR FUTURE.

The parents come back after three weeks of following the show's instructions, and get to see a new version of their kids at 40 - looking ridiculously healthy and cheerful.

It's my favourite TV show, it's laugh out loud funny and ridiculous. It's also quite disturbing though. Not only does it show just how lame UK parents are these days, but it's got a real 'Do as we say or your kids will die' tone.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed