Back to Manhattan (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Back To Manhattan - A Great First Film!
TomDugan22 October 2004
Take a shot of Seinfield and Chapelle, throw in some Rat Pack and Godfather and you have newcomer Rob Reilly's comedy film 'Back To Manhattan.' The film is a very funny day-in-the-lives-of two loan sharks, Frankie and Paulie. They are genuine tough guys. Their repartee blisters paint and their hair is perfect. But bodies? Bullets? Moles? Hot Cars? Not in this film! And that is what makes this comedy of errors such fun.

Our anti-heroes take their sweet time waltzing through an ensemble film that twists and turns from Jersey and Queens to Manhattan. They are out to collect a late loan payment but in this film, it is not the destination that is important but the very funny trip along the way. Barely coasting along in a half-dead, gas-guzzling 1992 Dodge Spirit, they get burrito bombed, chased by a rabid pit bull, dissed by a retired hit-man, flummoxed by a wired Mets fan, hosed by car thieves, and where are their guns? In short, these guys get no respect but they don't seem worried. And that is where the easy fun and laughs are throughout this what-could- possibly-go-wrong-next film.

Frankie and Paulie, played to perfection by Eddie Sicoli and Paul Dunleavy, hold the film together with their comfortable performances and strong screen chemistry. They have an easy relationship that seems to be a perfect match for the film. You have seen guys like this in Brooklyn and Queens, slicking their hair and chasing the girls, but never on the screen with this kind panache. Michael MacKewice, Lora Pfeiffer, Justin Allen and Steve DeVito also do well with their roles as a wired Mets fan, his girlfriend and two petty crooks.

As far as the writing and directing, Rob Reilly is a gifted filmmaker. Rob has a great ear for dialogue and his script always rings true. His staging, details and understatement also payoff with some very funny material. Frankie's fifteen-minute blind date with a giant is priceless comedy, all done with dialog and reaction shots. There are also many times when other directors with less restraint would have played the comedy with broader strokes, but then the film wouldn't have its easy-going fun and charm that make it work so well.

And then there's the film's rocking sound track. It is clear this director feels music is just as important as his visuals. He uses it skillfully to weave transitions and punchlines together as well as reinforce the good time feeling of the film. The film uses the work of half a dozen Indie artists from New York to LA for a more raw feel.

According to the director who spoke at the NY International Independent Film and Video Festival, this film was done for $18,000. All I can say is WOW - I can't wait for Reilly's next film!

8 / 10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quick Moving Gangster Comedy
rhsteppingout13 April 2006
I just finished watching the DVD copy of Back To Manhattan and I enjoyed it! As a low-budget, independent film, I think it was very well done. Considering the film was shot on a shoestring, I think the exterior scenes in New Jersey and Manhattan were quite good and the director, Rob Reilly, kept the story and the cast going at a brisk pace.

Eddie Sicoli and Paul Dunleavy were wonderful as the two mobsters out to get their money. Their comic timing was excellent and their interaction with each other and the situations they were involved in were very funny. Michael MacKewice as Jack provided the perfect comic centerpiece as an average Joe who unwittingly finds himself in misunderstandings and mix-ups. MacKewice's character was reminiscent of a Harold Lloyd or a Buster Keaton innocently getting intertwined in amusing and outrageous mishaps. The rest of the performers were fine, however the three leads were definitely the standouts.

The film had sort of a Martin Scorcese look about it without the weight and gravity. It was simply a fun and enjoyable film to watch. I think the director Rob Reilly has quite a talent as a director of film and he and the three actors mentioned have great potential for success in major motion pictures in the future.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fun film.
david-276120 January 2006
Ordinarily many independent film makers skew towards the shockers, horrors, mind twisters, bizarre, abstract, etc. Rob's film is a refreshing film in a genre that has to be one of the most difficult to produce - comedy.

The premise and character development is fun to watch. A guy running around NY with a baseball bat to get signed by his favorite star while his girl is shopping at Massey's. A loan shark and his protégée on a normal day of collecting getting side tracked with a chance of love. A bride and groom thrown into the mix provide for a climactic and hilarious ending.

As I understand it, BTM film was produced film style using a Cannon DV camera and a computer to edit. Check out the Directors Commentary on the DVD. It's pretty cool with a lot of film making tips.

Overall I give the film a 7. With more directing and technical experience, money and time and perhaps better talent, it could have been easily a 9. The script is pretty darn good. From a director and his first time out of the gate, quite an impressive job. A fun movie.

David
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a film!
alliewayfilms23 October 2005
This film was the perfect combination of Funny and HILARIOUS! Rob Reilly really knows how to serve up a good time, for his audience. If you haven't seen this film, then you are missing one of the greatest times you have ever had, while in Manhattan! Who would believe this film was made on such a tiny budget? If I wasn't told...I wouldn't. Reilly is pure talent, that I am sure we can expect more great works like this from. The acting was phenomenal and equaled the writing, cinematography, music...Every aspect of the film made it worth sitting through. I sat through it 12 times so far (I own the DVD) and I STILL go and see it when it screens in theaters. Get "Back to Manhattan" It's well worth the trip!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Film Worth Watching !
Aprossino5 June 2008
Hi, I am new to the Film/Acting Industry, however, I Know a good storyline and directing when I see it. Rob Reilly is a new, fresh and talented director. Keep your eye on Rob Reilly for he is the new wave of the future in film-making. His characters,especially of, Frankie and Paulie remind me of the Honeymooners with Jackie Gleason and Art Carney, what a Breath of Fresh air. I have watched this film 6 Times and it is always a blast to see again. Don't hesitate to check it out. I would recommend this film to anyone in film Making looking for a "Breath of Fresh Air" . My favorite character in the film is "Frankie" he cracks me up. He looks like a real gangster with class. I love this film! What more can I say... 10+ stars for Rob Reilly keep it coming baby. Looking forward to your next film, "Frankie and Paulie's Big Scratch" slated, as per the website, (www.cinemook.com) scheduled for preproduction in 2008. Alfred Di'Como
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid First Comedy
patricialunde3 December 2012
I actually came here to see if there were more Frankie and Paulie films, and wound up posting because of the crazy low rating this film has. "Back To Manhattan" is a fun little indie gem, with two leads I think are hilarious! In fact, I am going to wear out my DVD getting friends to watch and counter the low average here. Rob Riley should take the new reviews to the bank and get us some more Frankie and Paulie films. Can't wait to see what the director has in mind for these guys next!

As far as the huge swing in votes on this film, I think we have a mix of friends and haters posting here. This film is NOT a ten but it sure isn't a three either. I am guessing an honest mix of votes would have to come in at a six because this film is a cut above average. Yes, this looks like a first effort but the director and "Frankie and Paulie" make this a really fun romp. And by the way, who cares if the film was shot digitally? Maybe no one noticed, but Eastman Kodak is selling printers these days and most theaters junked their film projectors years ago. So much for the film angst of 2005! ;)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Do not pass, GO -- "Back To Manhattan"!
justjoe-214 April 2006
Cinemook films presents "Back To Manhattan," Writer/Director Rob Reilly's debut feature film, and I gotta say I am really impressed. I watched it for the fourth time this week. It gets funnier each time! How can I describe it? Let's see... it's kind of like "The Sopranos" meets "Seinfeld" with some Three Stooges slapstick thrown in for good measure.

It's a day in the lives of two low-rent Wiseguy knucklehead Loansharks named Frankie and Paulie, played brilliantly by Eddie Sicoli and Paul Dunleavy. Paulie is the kind of guy who gets chocolate all over his face eating an éclair -- he enjoys practical jokes... like tormenting world weary Frankie with the novelty toy "Alien Recorder," a mimicking device, and trying to pick up girls with the worlds oldest and awfullest one liners -- "I may not be Fred Flintstone, but I'm sure I can make your bedrock." Believe it or not Paulie's pickup techniques work on Donna aka Ami Colon, who sets Frankie up with her amazon gal pal Sue Fox so the foursome can go on a double date in a brief subplot. But the film is mostly about Frankie and Paulie's adventures trying to collect a debt from Johnny and Stevie aka Justin Allen and Steve Devito, two deadbeat nitwit barflies who cook up a hair-brained get rich quick scheme in an effort to avoid hot water. Things only get worse for John and Steve as they woefully attempt purse snatching and muggings, only to be rebuffed at every turn.

A parallel story line in New Jersey introduces us to die-hard Mets fan Jack aka Michael MacKewice and his well meaning knockout girlfriend Karen aka Lora Pfeiffer. Jack is a likable but hapless schmo who has the uncanny ability to always be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Karen drives Jack into the city to return her bosses loaner car, they go separate ways and agree to meet later. As the story unfolds Jack is mistakenly perceived as a masturbating motorist, a mustard spraying troublemaker, a bat wielding thug, a wedding crasher (literally), and a boobs staring pervert. Of course Jack really isn't any of these things, but try telling that to the angry mob chasing him through the streets of New York City. Mayhem ensues as this comedy of errors plays out to a surprising and funny conclusion.

Reilly's run and gun style of film-making is very compelling, always keeping the audience interested and involved and wanting more. The film was made for a mere $18,000.00, and I had a million questions about how this is even possible, but most were answered in the DVD Director commentary section, which is almost as entertaining as the film itself. There's fun facts, trivia, and technical tidbits. For example: did you know it's OK to shoot hand-held in NYC, but you needed insurance and permits to use a camera mounted on a tripod? Or that when Rob Reilly rented two Petty Cabs for chase scenes, he also hired their drivers (Richard Warner and Eyzar Derrick) as actors? You'll also no doubt really dig the grunge soundtrack, especially tunes from Jason Morphew.

Move over John Sayles, there's a new sheriff in town, and his name is Rob Reilly. The BackToManhattan.com website says a sequel is in the works called "Frankie and Paulie's Big Scratch" -- really looking forward to that and more from this bright young Director. Congratulations on your film-making debut, Rob -- this one's a keeper.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
not bad...okay at times, but unsatisfying in total (SPOILERS)
bajbij3 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, we have to clear up a big misclarification here. Yes, it is very admirable that this movie was made for 18 grand, but to compare that achievement to films like CLERKS and EL MARIACHI undercuts one thing: those movies were shot on FILM as opposed to VIDEO which was what BACK TO MANHATTAN was shot on. Why is that important? Because shooting on video is A LOT cheaper than on film. If this movie was shot on film, I can guarantee you the budget would NOT have been 18 grand (at least we'd be talking 30 grand.) SO such a campaign hurts the movie's chances of being taken seriously as a "film," which is unfair because it does at least serve to entertain the audience with its various cutaways to different situations.

It does provide certain laughs here or there but in the end it was an unsatisfying experience. What am I supposed to take of that guy's Manhattan phobia? Where was the payoff in that? And exactly how the hell hard is it to explain to a horny cameraman you mistook the sexy reporter for her twin sister? What a time to get tongue tied. The mob characters are what you expect, stereotypical comic foil that is neither funny nor offensive (if it was either, this movie would be daring.) The girls in the movie were hot but VERY underutilized which is a shame. The editing is at times pretty well done and helps keep the pace moving along, never boring the viewer, and the cameo by a certain NY baseball icon was a very nice touch, but in the end there was nothing I took from it. Impressive debut for Rob Reilly? I give him his props seeing as how I could tell how difficult it was to make the movie, but with a better script and production values, he probably can still deliver.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed