User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
The humor is very, very broad.
planktonrules10 January 2013
Eddie Foy Jr. plays an obnoxious brother-in-law who comes not only to visit but makes a total menace of himself. And, despite Foy's horribly boorish behavior, his sister-in-law excuses everything and treats her poor husband (Walter Catlett) like dirt. While it was supposed to be a comedy, the humor was generally far from funny--mostly because Foy's character was so far over-played that he seemed less like a thoughtless person and more like Satan. And, as a result, only the most easy to please people will enjoy this film--others will simply be irritated. A terribly unfunny and painful film from start to finish.

A few things to note. First, the short was narrated by Frank McHugh--someone you might not expect to be narrating anything. Second, while I could be mistaken, the interior of the mansion late in the film appears to be the same one used in "The Beverly Hillbillies" TV show. Third, there is a somewhat offensive black joke--though it's no more distasteful than the rest of this crappy film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Strange Warner Short
Michael_Elliott23 April 2012
Alex in Wonderland (1940)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

This rather strange short has a husband (Walter Catlett) becoming upset when his brother-in-law Alex (Eddie Foy, Jr.) comes to stay with him. The annoying relative finally does something good by getting them invited to a party but of course things don't work out well in the end. This 14-minute comedy from Warner appears to be partially influenced by The Three Stooges as there are many examples of sound effects being used to try and jazz up the laughs. These sound effects really don't work in regards to laugh but that type of comedy just seems to far from what you'd expect from both Catlett and Foy that you can't help but be slightly drawn into the weirdness. I think the short deserves some credit because I can honestly say that I've never seen a Warner short like it before. It's certainly not a masterpiece but I think those who enjoy sitting through short subjects should at least find it to be an interesting curio. Both Catlett and Foy work well together even though the screenplay isn't anything to write home about. The two of them can bounce off one another at a good rate and their energy helps keep the film moving.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disturbing racial undertones
irenencurdie10 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I am surprised to have seen it twice on Turner Classic Movies (TCM) since the short is not very funny and has a fairly objectionable scene. At the costume party, Alex asks a black waiter if he is a guest, rubs a finger against the waiter's cheek to see if he is wearing make-up that will come off, and then, when he has determined that the man is not a white guy in black face, hands him his champagne (or wine?) glass and waves him away. The first time I saw this my mouth dropped in horror. The second time I saw it I was equally disgusted at the attempted humor at the waiter's expense. Granted, Alex is presented as a buffoon prior to this display of racial prejudice but he comes out on top in the end by marrying the daughter of the rich man throwing the party. I hate the fact that he is rewarded after such a disgusting display. This is a terrible short to showcase in this day and age. It should be dropped in the darkest hole TCM can find. Barring that, it should only be brought out for discussions of race relations on screen as an example of how the twentieth century got it so, so wrong.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed