"Masterpiece" The Railway Children (TV Episode 2000) Poster

(TV Series)

(2000)

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
superior TV adaptation of an old favourite
didi-56 February 2005
This (perhaps superfluous) version of the Edith Nesbit novel was made for TV and, in an interesting piece of casting, had Jenny Agutter as the mother – she had been eldest daughter Bobbie thirty years earlier. Some changes to the fabric of the story were inevitable: more screen time is given to the events which cause the children's father to be arrested; the paper chase is no longer linked to the family of the old gentleman; and some of the characters are more sharply drawn than before.

As Bobbie, Jemima Rooper, is very good, but the other children Phyllis and Peter are just OK (played by Clare Thomas and Jack Blumenau). Agutter is perfect as their careworn mother, while Michael Kitchen makes an impact as their wronged father. Gregor Fisher plays Perks the railway-man with a good combination of jollity and righteous indignation; and Richard Attenborough is an inspired choice for the old gentleman (who is not as mysterious as he had been in the 1970s version; we guess he's a high-up in the civil service or the government in this one).

The great strength of the TV version is the attention to detail - we can feel the smoky fog from the 30s steam train as it rushes through the countryside.

An enjoyable TV film, but a complement to the classic one, not a replacement.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very well done adaptation of a great book, and almost as good as the timeless 1970 film
TheLittleSongbird30 January 2010
I love the book by Edith Nesbitt, it is just so beautiful, timeless and heart warming, and the 1970 film directed by Lionel Jeffries is one of my childhood favourites and still one of my all time favourite films. This 2000 adaptation is very, very good, and almost as good as the 1970 version. I personally prefer the 1970 film, but maybe I am biased because I grew up with it. But this is very good, really it is. It is true to the style of the book, while taking some liberties. The only real disappointment was Bobbie's reconciliation with her father at the train station, that was a real tearjerker in the Lionel Jeffries film, it didn't quite have such an effect on me here. But I really liked how they expanded some of the events of the book. The period detail is also outstanding, the scenery is beautiful, the costumes lovely and the trains superbly designed. The music is also beautiful, and the acting is very good. Jenny Agutter was absolutely enchanting as Bobbie in the 1970 film, and here she plays Mother with real warmth and sincerity. Jemima Rooper is a nice Bobbie, and Jack Blumenau and Clare Thomas were good as Peter and Phyllis. Michael Kitchen was really quite charming as Father, but we don't see him much, and Gregor Fisher is jolly, fun and somewhat indignant as Perks. I love Richard Attenborough, both as actor and director, and his casting was inspired. He really made the most of the Old Gentleman, even if the character isn't as mysterious as he is in the book and the 1970 film. All in all, I liked this adaptation very much. 8.5/10 Bethany Cox
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You have to have this one for the set
rayfaetroon5813 July 2014
I have bought this title as in my opinion, it should be place next to the original version.

It is worthy of the title. The fact it has Jenny Agutter as the Mother. In 'real time, it's as if the daughter has grown along with the time difference of the film dates.

You cannot beat the original, especially the finale where Roberta says "Daddy my Daddy" a line which still brings a lump to my throat when I see the film again.

I would like to add that I have a DVD titled The Railway Grandchildren. A title that is not listed on the IMDb? Could IMDb confirm or deny my findings through this format?
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Almost as good as the 1970 version...
peanut-1813 November 2000
I very much enjoyed this latest version of The Railway Children, yet I felt it left out a very important part by not including the relationship between the injured hound, Jim, and the children's "Old Gentleman," and by adding a romantic sub-text between Bobbie and Jim not found in the book. I was also disappointed in the portrayal of the bargee, (and the elimination of his wife and baby son), and the elimination of the scene where Peter and Phyl wake the signalman up. Petty grievances, yes, but I'm so fond of the book that I want any movie to include all my favorite bits. The performances were wonderful; Jack Blumenau as Peter was especially effective at capturing the wistfulness of a boy in the company of too many women. Jenny Agutter as the mother was a nice touch, and Jemima Rooper as Bobbie and Clare Thomas as Phyl were spot on. It's such a delightful story, and it's not as sickly sweet as much of the so-called "family fare" being offered up these days. Even though the story is almost a hundred years old, its freshness and message are still relevant, and it allows a child to imagine being as resourceful as the protagonists. Well done indeed, and if I do prefer the earlier movie, it's not by much!
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Simply wonderful
FrozenDreamer12 April 2004
I watched this movie out of sheer chance. Sitting far away from my remote, and on a lazy Easter Monday afternoon... I couldn't be bother to get up and change the channel... so just stayed where I was and watched this great film.

There is no death... no destruction. It's just a happy film that makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside. It's really good... so if you get the chance to watch it, do.

10 flaps outta 10 because it made me happy. And make sure you have a big box of chocolates with you when you watch it as well... coz it makes it even sweeter :) FrozenDreamer xxx
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This is even better than the first film!
whistlestop18 November 2005
I just loved this film - even though I thought the first 1970 film was wonderful, this is better. All the actors are super, and I thought Gregor Fisher was great as Perks, a lovely warmth to him. The really inspired touch was in getting Jenny Agutter to play the mother role this time, and she does it superbly. I always chuckle over the lines given to Bobbie and herself; she warns Bobbie not to go onto the railway line, and Bobbie asks innocently "Didn't you ever walk on the rail tracks when you were a girl?" Tongue in cheek, a nice touch... The trains are gorgeous, scenery beautiful, but we don't see enough of the lovely Michael Kitchen. I've bought this one to watch again and again.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, but look at what went before
neil-47611 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The Railway Children is one of those works which seems to demand periodic reworking, and this turn-of-the-millennium version comes 30 years after Lionel Jeffries' classic version.

This is good, make no mistake, and comes with a solid recommendation - you will enjoy it. The source material is strong, and there are no missteps in how it is handled. And, of course, it is interesting to see Jenny Agutter playing Mother, having played eldest child Roberta in the preceding version.

And there's the rub. Because you will enjoy this version much more if you have never seen the 1970 version. Where this version is good, Jeffries' version is great. Where the casting is excellent in this version, it doesn't quite reach the pinnacle of casting in the previous film.

This comes over, I fear, as damning with faint praise, and I suppose it is.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
On track to sheer delight
Davcat24 April 2000
What a sheer delight this TV film was. I saw it last night (Sunday, 23 April 2000) as it premiered on TV, and really enjoyed it. Jenny Agutter, as Mother (originally oldest daughter in the 1970 version) took a bit of a back seat, but I thought the young actors who played her children did a splendid job. This was particularly so for the oldest daughter (Bobbie, played by Jemima Rooper) who was very convincing in her roll. The young lad (Peter, played by Jack Blumenau) was a real natural as well. Hard to fault, but I was not sure of Gregor Fisher's roll as the Station Keeper, Perks. He tends to be too typecast in the UK, as an underclass Scotsman, to carry the roll off very well. I highly recommend this film - it really is a breath of fresh air, when we suffer so much from films which show much bleak dystopia, or over-sugary romantic mush. Well done to all involved - including the first class (pun!) actors, like the "Old Gentleman". A real treat.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Railway Children - A Sure Journey To Enjoyment
krocheav25 March 2020
Regarding the often asked question; which version is the best...1970 or 2000? It's probably a balance of personal preference. Both versions have unique qualities, so maybe it's best to watch each a week or so apart. Perhaps there's something about the latter that keeps the story unfolding in a more natural fashion (less quirky) and the cast seem easier to accept as natural (again, personal interpretations). E. Nesbit's book leaves itself open to the makings of a great family movie classic - with many emotions based on her own life experiences (siblings and family members)

It's easy to find endearing qualities within each and every character, young or old, and the viewer can't help but wish for the best outcomes for all - even without any manipulation from the movie makers (and that's saying something) The striking locations and variety of gloriously preserved full steam trains (Bluebell Railway) are a joy to behold! You can't help but wish you were there. Photography, music, editing, all add up to superior entertainment for any age group - quite not to be missed and the 'studio' DVDs are very good.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a beautiful film
Sylviastel20 November 2001
I really loved this film. It is beautifully done with a stellar cast of actors and actresses. The countryside setting is beautiful and heavenly. A touching story of a rich family who becomes poor and loses their father to prison. Their relationship with Sir Richard Attenborough's character is charming, delightful, and wishful. The children seek escape from their problems at the railroad tracks. By a simple wave, they begin a wonderful relationship. Sir Richard is more like a Santa Claus character and he does his humanly best to help them. It doesn't matter by the end, that they still live poorly than before as long as they're still together. I would strongly recommend this film version and the Edith Nesbit book to teachers and their English classes. I think they would benefit it form it.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A superfluous remake
albertroland200526 December 2012
This is just an attempted copy of the 1970 film. It largely tries to only mimic the original film. That film was a masterpiece and so this film is quite simply an embarrassment. Had this film been its own interpretation of the story then it might have been a worthwhile remake. For example Gregor Fisher is simply acting Bernard Cribbins character rather than playing the role of the character in the story. There are many other ridiculous parallels. Jenny Agutter is of course just wonderful as the mother. This adds a cheesy twist but that is hardly a reason for a remake, or rather re-hashing, of the film. Having the 1970 film ingrained so much in my mind, I found this film to be a toe-curling embarrassment. A 'meddlement'. What was the point of it?
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Delightful reworking of a family favourite
Filmtribute7 December 2003
For those of us who were spellbound all those years ago by Lionel Jeffries' vision and would therefore view the idea of a further version with disdain, you should be delighted to know that Catherine Morshead, of the popular TV series `Silent Witness' and `Dangerfield' fame, has created just as much a treat thirty years on for Carlton TV.

Simon Nye of `Men Behaving Badly' fame provides a script that restrains any of the cast from copying the antics of his notorious creations, although his faithful adaptation includes Edith Nesbit's incredibly condescending remark by the mother as she tells her three clearly cosseted children, "We've got to play at being poor for a bit". This sentence is offered as explanation for the enforced move for the middle class family from a grand London house to the country, to a friend's cottage after the father is sentenced to five years imprisonment on spying charges. The 1968 BBC serial believably depicted a little white house of the book, unlike the later productions with presumably bigger budgets which opted for proportionally larger rambling farmhouses that would seem impossible to manage without servants, and not at all in keeping with a family of straitened means. The decision by the mother not to tell her children the truth is in keeping for the period but would seem unlikely in today's culture of celebrity gawping. Fortunately for them they are kept protectively away from school and thus any chance of mixing with other youngsters, so never run the gauntlet of cruel taunts. Thus with inevitable curiosity they find themselves drawn to exploring the nearby railway and its activities.

John Daly (from a host of TV productions through the 1990's including the exquisitely filmed `Persuasion') literally paints a picture in motion of the train ferrying the family to the country by dusk that is in splendid harmony with Simon Lacey's musical score, and an image of W H Auden's poem `Night Mail' is fittingly conjured up: "Past cotton-grass and moorland boulder, Shovelling white steam over her shoulder, Snorting noisily as she passes, Silent miles of wind-bent grasses."

The 1903 period detail of this remake is commendable, allowing for the author's use of 1870's red petticoats and the absence of the starched formal Edwardian capes of the 1970 film. The Bluebell Railway on the borders of the Capability Brown designed Sheffield Park in Sussex, replaces the Bronte country and Keighly and Worth Valley Railway of the previous adaptations. The well preserved rolling stock gets full promotional treatment and the longest restored tunnel on a private line is in no need of a temporary extension, as was required for its predecessor for the hare and hounds race. Incidentally the Rev W Awdry wrote a tribute to the Bluebell Railway in 1963 to add to his `Thomas the Tank Engine' collection with a tale dedicated to the line's first engine, Stepney, a Stroudley Terrier built in 1875.

The Old Gentleman role is perfectly filled by Richard Attenborough in his quintessential Santa Clause mode borrowed from the remake of `Miracle on 34th Street'. Jenny Agutter makes a wonderful transition from her memorable performance as Bobbie three decades earlier, into a different Mother to her predecessor, Dinah Sheridan, but with a grace and charm of her own. Jemina Rooper manages to combine a modern Roberta with a past innocence and brings maturity to the role with her 18 years, as she asks the painfully pertinent question of her mother as to how long you can remember someone you really love without seeing them. Jack Blumenau (starring in Peter Pan at the Savoy Theatre) and Clare Thomas prove very ably suited for the younger siblings of Peter and Phyllis, with touching but not mawkish performances. On first sight Gregor Fisher (currently to be seen in Richard Curtiss' directorial debut `Love Actually') struck me as an unusual choice for Perks and in stark contrast to the excitable Bernard Cribbins of the 1970 film. I am more used to seeing him in a string vest uttering incomprehensible Glaswegian, at least to my uninitiated Sassenach ears, in his guise as Rab C Nesbit, which probably coloured my initial impression. However, I warmed to his creation and he interacts well with the severe stationmaster (Clive Russell) and the rest of the cast. Sophie Thompson is naturally the shrinking violet that she does so well as Perks' wife, akin to her Miss Bates in `Emma' and the antithesis of her prurient bridesmaid in `Four Weddings and a Funeral'.

Agutter argues that Nesbit's desire for a utopian society is reflected in her writing as alluded to in the `The Phoenix and The Carpet', which the BBC turned into a welcome children's teatime serial in 1997, and that, like all her Edwardian novels, captures an innocence that is to be destroyed with the outbreak of the First World War. A further theme of Nesbit's novels concerns time and memory as Agutter cites on the Carlton website, taking from the 'Enchanted Castle', the following: "The plan of the world seems plain, like an easy sum that one writes in big figures on a child's slate. One wonders how one can ever have wondered about anything. Space is not; every place that one has seen or dreamed of is here. Time is not; into this instant is crowded all that one has ever done or dreamed of doing. It is a moment and it is eternity." The plan of the world is indeed very plain when we are young with the clean slate before us, it is only as we grow that we complicate the simplistic. We become so embroiled in life's mesh that by the time we realise what has happened we have been caught too tightly in the grasp of the here and now to extricate ourselves.

This very fitting tribute to a timeless classic that has never been out of print, should ensure its continued popularity for generations to come with both book and film available from Amazon's website.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Adventures in poverty.
planktonrules18 January 2013
Apparently, this film (also an episode of the American show "Masterpiece Theater") is from a novel very famous in the UK--though I doubt if that many folks in the States have heard of it. "The Railway Children" is a very sweet tale about three siblings who manage to keep up their spirits and do good when their family suddenly is reduced to poverty.

When the film begins, this family lives in a nice home and has no apparent worries. However, soon their father disappears and their mother gives them little idea where the man went. But, she also tells them that now that he is gone, they cannot afford to live in their home and move to the countryside. For some time, they can barely afford to eat--and things get only worse when mother gets ill. So, the three kids manage to do amazingly well to keep the family together, save many lives and live happily ever after.

This is a very nice family film which promotes many nice virtues--such as faith, kindness and a willingness to give even when you are nearly without. Very well produced and extremely well acted by the children. Well worth seeing.

By the way, Jenny Agutter played in the 1970 version of this story (as a child) and here she plays the long-suffering mother.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great family entertainment
bavo-12 July 2006
I loved this, what a great way to spend a cold Sunday afternoon in Sydney. I remember watching and really enjoying both the 1970 movie and series of The Railway Children as a girl. It was a nice surprise to see Jenny Agutter who was Roberta then, play the Mother this time with just the right amount of fragility and fortitude. The children, especially the girl who played Roberta, were delightful and they made a very believable family. Richard Attenborough was wonderful as always as the old gentleman, who wouldn't want a kindly friend like him? The scenery was really beautiful, lush and green and the 1905 touches like the steam trains and fashion are very much appreciated. A lovely way to revisit this timeless story.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than the 1970 version Warning: Spoilers
Having read the novel and than seeing first the 1970 version and than this one (twice) I must say the latter is the most faithful to the book and also the better movie. Not that the actors in the 1970 version didn't do a good job, but my main gripe was that the children (especially the girls) were too old to play the railway children. In the 2000 version we have 3 young talented actors playing the railway children. Clare Thomas was charming as Phyllis and Jack Blumenau fitting as Peter. But the best casting was Jemima Rooper as Bobbie. Even though technically not a minor anymore I think she portrayed the book version of Bobbie exactly as I imagined it. Jenny Agutter wasn't bad either as Bobbie in the 1970 version but I think the mother role fitted her better. But Jemima to me was the perfect Bobbie and as she is my favorite character in the story I was happy the focus was on her. A second favorite is Mr. Perks who was brilliantly portrayed by Gregor Fisher, serious but with a good sense of dry humour. The only thing I could fault the movie is that some parts were left out and that it went fast, a bit too fast sometimes. But still love it and it has an unlimited re-watch value for me.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
12 Year-old American male speaks out about TRC
live-and-let-live11 April 2020
Stuck inside due to coronavirus watching movies. Grammy picked out this and I am glad about it. I liked the parts where the children helped out people in need and in danger. My favorite character was the old man who sat at the back of the train. The acting (of all) was exceptional. I'm very glad that the daddy was not a spy, and that he was released. I definitely recommend this movie. It had NO foul language.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Refreshing and relevant story for family viewing
fjardin4522 March 2013
I went looking for this movie, remembering the earlier 1970s version, which I saw as a pre-teen. I enjoyed it then but couldn't remember why or much about the plot. The costumes of the 1900s were definitely memorable and were the feature I remember most.

Since viewing the 2000 version yesterday I have decided to replay it for my seven year old great-nephew at our next movie night. He's fairly bright and an avid reader. He seems to enjoy more cerebral story lines compared with some of his peers. Other movies he's watched and enjoyed immensely are Hugo, The Indian in the Cupboard, The Borrowers and Ice Age. I think The Railway Children will appeal to him because of the themes, the steam trains, the adventure and humour, and the children's teamwork and problem solving.

His family also live in straitened circumstances since the global recession hit and, although his stay-at-home Mum and baker Dad work very hard for the three boys, they just can't stretch to outings or holidays - which is most of his living memory.

The story is relevant to him, even though it is set in the 1900s. The themes which resonate are 1) sticking together through adversity 2) standing up for what you believe in 3) 'going without' cheerfully and 4) taking responsibility for how you feel in a given situation, even if you can't control the events themselves.

Being the eldest in a family of three boys, he will feel fortunate when he hears Peter saying that he wished he had brothers!

I particularly liked the character of railway station porter, Albert Perks, played by Gregor Fisher. Until I'd read contributions from some of the British reviewers I didn't realise this was an atypical role for him as an actor. He seemed so well suited to this character in The Railway Children.

One aspect that is exercising my mind is the comparison from a 'health and safety' perspective between the 1900s and today. We live in an area which has many trains - commuter and freight trains and the public safety messages about line safety today are NOT going to be reinforced from watching this movie. But it will provide a good conversation opportunity to reinforce those after watching.

A good movie for adults and children watching together - and to remember as a 'classic'.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A beautiful piece of work
mmiller113 November 2000
Wonderful cast, excellent photography, and (wonder of wonders to an American TV watcher) a literate script! I heartily agree about Ms. Rooper - I will look forward to seeing her again. Jenny Agutter's beauty has deepened and grown since I first saw her in Walkabout 30+ years ago. Michael Kitchen, Clive Russell, Sir Richard Attenborough, and Gregor Fisher all are believable, and have that depth that British actors have (from doing more stage, I guess.) Note: unlike the previous commenters, I haven't seen Gregor Fisher often enough for him to be typecast yet. Judging from this film, I would like to.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Railway Children
janatmsn25 October 2005
I took this movie home to watch but it was not something I planned on. I read what it was about and decided to give it a try. I was very pleased and would recommend it to anyone who wants an uplifting story.The children were to be admired and the good they did was heartwarming.It's the type of movie everyone needs to see no matter how old.You just might learn something.Everything turned out right for them because they tried to make everything turn out right for everyone else.It is a story we should try to imitate in our everyday life. It was truly inspiring.I would like to see more of this woman's stories on DVD this one was so very good I am sure her others would be just as good.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Just a lovely, lovely film
kidboots28 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
"The Railway Children" is one of my most favourite books and this film does not disappoint in the slightest. The only complaint is that the children's pinafores always look starched and bright white, as of course they would if you were mucking about in fields and railway stations all day!!! Edith Nesbit was an Edwardian writer (who had a very interesting life) who wrote about children who really behaved like children and had interesting adventures, usually free from adult supervision. They were put into dramatic situations - in "The Railway Children" their father is wrongfully imprisoned, their possessions are auctioned off, they help a Russian who has escaped from Siberia locate his wife and children and help a young lad who has had an accident in the train tunnel.

It tells of three children - Bobbie, Phyllis and Peter ( the 3 young performers, I thought were pretty perfect in their roles) - who, when their father is falsely imprisoned for treason, go with their mother to live in the country. After getting off on the wrong foot (Peter steals coal from the yard after his mother tells them that they are too poor to afford coal for fires) they make friends with the Station Master and Perks and proceed to have lots of adventures. Perk's birthday, one of my favourite parts of the book is included and it doesn't disappoint. Gregor Fisher, who plays Perks is marvelous. Apart from Jenny Agutter and Michael Kitchen none of the actors were familiar to me . David Bamber who played quirky Doctor Forrest, I had seen the other week in a Midsomer Murder episode but that was it.

One adventure that wasn't in the film was the barge fire. In the film there was an incident on a bridge where rough bargemen had called the children "posh" and thrown rocks at them!!! In the book the bargeman and his wife went to the pub, their barge caught on fire and the children saved the baby and helped put out the fire. The book also had political views as well (Edith Nesbit was one of the founders of the Fabian Society). There was also in the book and film, the scene where the mother tells Bobbie to send special prayers for all prisoners and captives.

Sir Richard Attenborough was a perfect "nice old gentleman" and I really think this film shows how lovely the world once was.

Highly, Highly Recommended.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Delightful!!
shootingstarr112 October 2009
I have not read the book, or seen any other version of this movie, but this was indeed a delightful movie. I felt that the characters were rich, even though I would have liked to know more about what was going on w/the father earlier in the movie.

The building up of the characters w/their new surroundings was beautiful and timely.

The experiences of the children in their new surroundings, reminded me so much of my own childhood, when I w/my brothers and friends would go exploring.

I am going to try to locate the book so that I can read it. and find the earlier version of the movie (which I read about in someone else's comments.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
From 'Rab C. Nesbitt' to E. Nesbit!
Rabical-912 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I was nine years old when this televised remake of the E. Nesbit's 1970 picture 'The Railway Children' went out. Believe it or not, I actually saw this version before I saw the original ( in fact, I had not even heard of the original at that time ). The main reason I tuned in was, of course, because my favourite actor Gregor Fisher ( not that any of you ever would have guessed he was my favourite! ) was involved in the project.

Like many classics, I feel there would be no point saying what 'The Railway Children' is all about. I will say that this remake does the original story justice, more than justice in fact. Jenny Agutter, in role reversal, now plays Mrs. Waterbury as opposed to daughter Bobbie. The roie of young Bobbie is taken on here by the lovely Jemima Rooper, and the younger siblings, Phyllis and Peter, are played by Clare Thomas and Jack Bleumenau. Gregor Fisher plays the chirpy station porter Perks, whom takes the children under his wing.

I realise I will be in a minority but this version I think is the better of the two. Casting Fisher in the role of Perks was a wise move. Bernard Cribbins' Perks was dull and grumpy. Fisher was cheerier and funnier. Despite the obvious comic interplay between Perks and the characters, there are some wonderfully touching moments too, particularly in the scene where the children, as well as other residents of the village present Perks with gifts as a gesture of esteem for his helpful and kindly nature. Clive Russell is also impressive as the stern stationmaster.

A true classic worth watching over and over again.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A family is happy until their dad is accused for something he did not do.
husnain_0527 October 2005
I really enjoyed watching The Railway children and it was nice to see Jenny Agutter as the mother as she had the part of Jemima Rooper as Bobbie back in 1970 and done a great job in both of The Railway children. Three kids live happily with their parents and are rich, until nearly everything changes. Their father is accused for something he did not do and the rest of the family have to move house. When they move house they find out that they live near a railway station and they save a train from an accident. A man helps the eldest child to find their dad and at the end they dad comes back from prison without the other two finding out.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great stuff
nicolnic9 August 2000
Brilliant adaptation, but I'd have to argue that Gregor Fisher was one of the highlights. I'm not saying that just coz I'm Scottish, but if he's typecast it's because he brings a highly endearing quality to the kind of characters he plays. He did a damn sight better than Bernard Cribbins' miserable performance in the original, certainly. A great show all round.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Movie of Hope for a Troubled World and Uneasy Times
bykrikie25 April 2021
Truly a must see movie. If still possible, refrain from reading descriptions/reviews. You will find nothing of the like here. Unknowingly, I assumed this would be about children headed to the country from major UK cities during WWII. I was delightedly wrong.

Maybe it was just a fleeting moment of clarity, sappy longing for hope, or momentary faith in humanity. I felt as though repressed pent-up hate, despair, and turmoil from personal and global events were uncontrollably spewing out of my pores an eyes.

There is no political agendas, no deep social messages other than be a good person. Frank Capra could not have done better with another Jimmy Stewart feature, albeit only a temporary escape from all that's happening in America and the rest of the world.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed