Critic Reviews

68

Metascore

Based on 32 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
100
Entertainment Weekly
May be the first movie to fully capture the way that drugs dislocate us from ourselves.
100
Rolling Stone
No one interested in the power and magic of movies should miss it.
100
He (Aronofsky) has put together a phantasmagoria of self-destructive obsession that is so visually astounding it becomes its own saving grace. Otherwise, we might not be able to bear it.
100
Philadelphia Inquirer
Aronofsky has fashioned a chilling vision that lives up to the caustic irony of its title and gives us a nightmare that is not lightly forgotten.
90
Be warned: it's a downer, and a knockout.
90
A work of art whose beauty has the eternal power of redemption.
88
Chicago Sun-Times
Aronofsky brings a new urgency to the drug movie by trying to reproduce, through his subjective camera, how his characters feel, or want to feel, or fear to feel.
38
Boston Globe
It's two hours of slumming in a vision of hell hatched from bourgeois comfort. That, and not its unsavory subject matter, is what makes it bummer theater.
30
While director Aronofsky pistol-whips your attention with his style, the characters (mostly relegated to human mannequins in Aronofsky's visual schemes) suffer big time.
20
In the end the movie goes nowhere a hundred movies haven't already been and tells us nothing we don't already know. It does so with so much violent energy, however, it's like four brutal years at film school crammed into an hour and a half.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Requiem for a Dream (2000) »

Explore More About Requiem for a Dream