Home
search
more | tips
SHOP TUBE TALES
Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Amazon.fr
IMDb > Tube Tales (1999) (TV) > IMDb user comments

IMDb user comments for
Tube Tales (1999) (TV)

advertisement
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 1 of 2:[1] [2] [Next]
Index 12 comments in total 

5 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-
Unusual and mysterious, 3 July 2005
8/10
Author: Lozenge_of_Love from England, Great Britain

I can't believe that there are so many bad reviews of this. I must say I liked this film very much. It shows some of the various events that can happen in and around London and on the underground. I find the stories unusual and mysterious and also the music and effects that go with the stories unusual and mysterious. I think people who are very interested in Britain or England or those who are Britoholics or Englandoholics should watch "Tube Tales" to see just what can go on in London. My favourite story from "Tube Tales" was "A Bird in the Hand" and I also liked "My Father the Liar". I especially liked the imagery and music of "A Bird in the Hand" and the overall story of "My Father the Liar". I am not quite sure why some stories are named as they are -stories such as "Grasshopper" and "Bone" but overall I think "Tube Tales" was a good and unusual film.

Was the above comment useful to you?

6 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-
Worth watching, if only for one segment, 4 February 2000
6/10
Author: crybaby-2 (t_j_b50@hotmail.com) from Essex, England

Although some segments were poor and some just average, this is worth watching if only for one segment. 'My father the liar' was brilliantly directed by Bob Hoskins, and as always Ray Winstone (the father) and Frank Harper (the station guard who appears in a number of the segments) played their roles to perfection. The real star however was the young boy who played the son. Although only on screen for not more than 10 minutes it is clear that this kid should be a huge British star in the future.

Was the above comment useful to you?

4 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-
Heartfelt and very funny (spoilers), 8 October 2001
Author: sleepsev (bearania@yahoo.com) from Bangkok, Thailand

*** This comment may contain spoilers ***

The whole film is one of my most favorite British films of the last five years, because it is really entertaining and moving. There's not a minute in this movie which makes me feel bored. 'Mr. Cool' is cool. 'Horny' is very funny and lovely. 'My Father, the Liar' gives me some strangely undescribable feeling. 'Mouth' is amusing. 'A Bird in the Hand' is affecting. 'Rosebud' is pleasantly strange.

However, my most favorite films are 'Bone' and 'Steal Away', because they can move me to tears. 'Bone' gives me the tears of joy and make me feel elated after seeing it. I thought what the guy does is one of the most beautiful and impressive ways to express feelings. It is one of the most heartfelt moment in cinema and affects me nearly as strongly as the ending of Eric Rohmer's 'The Green Ray.'

As for 'Steal Away,' I can't help crying when the criminal turns to wash the feet of the foot-washer. I think this moment in 'Steal Away' has something in common with that moment in 'Bone.' In these two moments, there is some deep communication between characters without using words. While words tend to be deceptive or inadequate to express what one thinks or feels, what these two characters in different films do is communication from their hearts, and that leads to real understanding. Though the ending of 'Steal Away' is a little bit predictable, its effectiveness is not lessened. While other films give me a lot of laugh, I feel these two films speak directly to my heart.

Was the above comment useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
So much for the London Underground.., 6 January 2006
9/10
Author: smiley-32 from Luton, England

I saw this film.. plus I bought it.. I must admit, it's not a bad film. Something I would watch on a rainy day.. With an all star cast of British actors.. It's no wonder why 9 stories or films all revolve in and around the London Underground. I think everyone from Jude Law to Ewan McGregor who directed the segments of the film. Plus you have Rachel Weisz and Denise Van Outen all doing their bit just to keep us entertained..

But at the end of the day. It's a pretty cool film. Hel! They even had that guy Richard Jobson, who used to interview people in Sky Movies.. Look at him now! He's directing films.. Nice one, man! 9 out 0f 10!

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
Great actors, poor script., 30 May 2007
4/10
Author: trip2themoon from United Kingdom

I saw this last night and was greatly disappointed. When I saw the wealth of great British talent in the opening credits I thought I was in for a real treat but sadly there is not one short movie in this which you could really enjoy. Some were just OK but not one was anything near great, way too artsy fartsy without any real substance. I saw New York's Subway Stories a year before I saw this and it was a great movie. Of the 10 shorts in Subway Stories the only one I disliked was the one directed by Abel Ferrara. Anyone who has watched Tube Tales and found it boring should try Subway Stories, it's far more interesting and it's based on 10 true stories. Overall I give this 4 out of 10, it would have been lower but some of the acting is good.

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-
Keeps you interested, 30 April 2001
7/10
Author: Angeneer from Athens, Greece

An overall entertaining collection of stories, which might not have a very clear message but manages to keep the interest alive. Everyday people in everyday situations with a punch of humour or drama. Style over content once again, but that's not a problem for this movie.

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-
Nine short stories set on the London Underground..., 16 November 1999
Author: The Movie Goblin from London, England

I saw the film at the London Film.

As is often the case with anthology films, some stories work better than others. None are particularly bad and none are particularly great either. The best shorts were Armundo Ianucci's "MOUTH" segment that is hilarious and unexpected, Charles McDougall's "STEAL AWAY" which is great, but starts off telling one story and ends with another, Stephen 'Lost in Space' Hopkins "HORNY" which stretches one gag for about ten minutes but gets away with it and is quite funny, and Gaby Dellal's "ROSEBUD" which is quirky but visually stimulating but ends without an ending.

Overall, not a bad try, most of the stories work but don't have a punchline.

Was the above comment useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
unusual, loose and pleasing, 17 March 2005
6/10
Author: globalloon2 from United Kingdom

i saw this and was quite pleased with what I saw. The stories were all very different in style and content. Setting was the obvious common ground as all the films are shot in and around the London Underground. I watched a couple at a time rather than the entire collection at once and I'm glad i did as it gave me time to reflect on them individually. I don't want to give any plots away, so all i can do is recommend these films based on their artistic merit. don't expect Hollywood gloss or loads of stunts; there are only a couple. not all of the shorts even have a traditional narrative. rather, you are immersed into a life as it passes through the underground. some unsettling surreality is balanced with plain old unsettled reality. just like travelling on the real underground. but beware, once you've seen this film you'll never want to carry your stash on the train again. In fact, you might just find yourself cycling around London!

Was the above comment useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
artsy, but not bad, 7 October 2003
Author: J King (blackfractal) from NYC

A collection of surreal, artsy short stories that feel more like visual narrative poems. If you view it with an eye for artistic style, it's not bad. Otherwise, the plots fall short in sustaining interest, and it is hard (but not impossible) to develop a liking for any of the characters. As a work of art, 6/10. As a movie, 3/10.

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
Lots of promise, fails to deliver, 20 September 2005
3/10
Author: mark-collins19 from United Kingdom

Sadly this piece is loaded with talent but gives the impression that the project was managed by a committee.

I suspect it will serve a good piece of social history if you don't waste a lot of time worrying about the story lines.

If the DVD had been released with more confidence it might have been nice to have some literature in the packaging. Can you spot I was desperate for some clues here?

It gets a 3 because of the sterling efforts of Denise Van Outen and maybe Ray Winstone. I am a big fan of Armando Iannucci who I suspect had spotted the absence of direction and must have written his story in his coffee break?

Was the above comment useful to you?


Page 1 of 2:[1] [2] [Next]

Add another comment


Related Links

Plot synopsis Ratings External reviews
Official site Plot keywords Main details
Your user comments Your vote history