Four Dogs Playing Poker (2000)

User Rating:

5.7/10   

Director:

Paul Rachman

Writers:

Shawn David Thompson (written by) &
William Quist (written by)

Genre:

Crime | Drama | Mystery | Thriller

Plot:

Four friends steal a valuable statuette for a dangerous black market art dealer, lose it and are forced to play a deadly bluffing game to save their lives.

Plot Keywords:

Friend | Black Market | Game | Ice Sculpture | Murder

Awards:

1 win

Cast

Olivia Williams	...	Audrey
Balthazar Getty	...	Julian
Arly Jover	...	Maria
Jason Cairns	...	Oscar
Ruben Moreno	...	Priest
Daniel London	...	Kevin
Stacy Edwards	...	Holly
Steve Jones	...	Tom (as Stephen Phillip Jones)
George Lazenby	...	Carlo
John Taylor	...	Dick (as John Nigel Taylor)
Tim Curry	...	Felix
Octavia Spencer	...	Waitress (as Octavia L. Spencer)
Ray Berrios	...	House Security Guard
Peter Mark Vasquez	...	Data Security Guard
Ramiro Fabian	...	Supervisor

Also Known As:

4 Dogs Playing Poker (USA) (video box title)

MPAA:

Rated R for language, drug use and some sexuality.

Runtime:

97 min | Germany:89 min (TV version)

Country:

USA

Language:

English | Spanish

Colour:

Colour

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1

Sound Mix:

Dolby SR

Certification:

Finland:K-15 | Iceland:16 | South Korea:15 | UK:15 | Canada:18A (video rating) | USA:R

Filming Locations:

Buenos Aires, Federal District, Argentina

Company:

Half Moon Entertainment

Goofs:

Miscellaneous: Kevin and Holly are listed in the credits twice.

Soundtrack:

Beyond Our Crime

betrayal and intrigue

Previous comments seem to be either one of extreme hate or pleasure. I find the extremes fascinating. I think this movie was average. Not great, but worthwhile watching. One that you need to watch twice to get the point. I found no part of it boring. The use of poker in the title has to do with the bluffing, faking, lying and not showing all of ones cards.

On the whole it is much better in terms of the story than most action films.

If plots making sense was a requirement for a good movie, then I guess there are very very few movies worth watching. The plot for example of Master and Commander, a movie I really enjoyed, was based on an absurd disregard for the navel power situation in 1805 wherein Britian had obtained complete mastery over the oceans (e.g., Battle of the Nile, 1803). So why should we attack Four Dogs for a gimmicky premise. Name a movie that doesn't involve some gimmick or suspension of disbelief to get the ball rolling.

To me the only unexplained part is why the bad guy wants a million from them, but that might also be part of the double crossing.

In Four Dogs, the fact that so called friends agree so easily to kill one another was one of the points -- their friendship wasn't worth a half million. It must also be kept in mind that they were being manipulating into agreeing with the idea and it was done so subtly that it is not until you see the movie for the second time that you can see the manipulations that are going one. There's actually a lot of subtly in the movie. But also notice how several members of the group were all prepared to double cross the rest. The main double crosser however did give at least one of them a chance.

It is very doubtful that the insurance scam idea would work, but the main characters didn't clue into the main problem with it -- back dating the payments on the policies -- thats a whole lotta fraud. But its a mute point, there is never any mention at the end of the film about cashing the policies in! Suggesting that the whole insurance scam was part of the doublecrossing plots and a bluff. It isn't important how fast the money will be paid out, whats important is that they players in this high stakes game, think that cashing in the policy on one of them, will save the rest.

The fact that the ships crew had a Mexican accent (I'm assuming that the Argentinian commentator meant accent, not language, cause the language is the same), isn't that surprising since the ship has an English name and is headed toward Los Angeles (home of a very large Mexican population) -- so its more likely to have a Mexican speaking crew than an Argentinian crew.

The whys or practicalities of the movies aren't really the main issues. The most interesting part of the movie is the crisis, the cut throat solution they come up with, how they are manipulated into the solution, and how the solution unravels (as planned).

There a very interesting thing going on when one of the characters asks another if he could really kill her.