Phoenix (1995) Poster

(I) (1995)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Titus 4 droid yarn...
themibjc-214 August 2000
There are some well known actors in this film Brad Dourif [DUNE], Billy Drago [Martial Law II], & William Sanderson [Bladerunner]. This film had some potential but failed miserably, the longer it went on the worse it got. Some of the SFX where ok, but still did nothing to make this film any better.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Jumbled wooden mess
edwardrevans30 July 2010
I've seen worse than this but not much. The Film is shot on the cheap and and it shows, you can clearly see the breeze blocks and the industrial warehouse style signs and scaffolding in shot all they have done is get some grey paint out. The movie itself has been edited poorly and is confusing to a degree where the start has been put in the middle and characters all of a sudden re-appear later in the story just to fill a plot whole. The acting too would be at home in a soft-core adult movie and the actors are forgettable. As for the pacing of the film it goes like this, Go to planet come back and go back to planet immediately again.

Complete rubbish.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"I knew this was gonna be a bad day."
rdfranciscritic27 January 2023
Argh! Yet more Space Marines storming in to save a mining colony, making us wish James Cameron's Aliens (1986) was never made. How many of these straight-to-video/cable low-grade Peter Hyman's Outland knocks offs of the mid-'90s -- either with terrorists mixing it up with space marines, or miners with a hatched xenomorph, or rogue androids on the loose -- all by way of either a pinch of The Dirty Dozen (1967), or The Magnificent Seven (1960), or Lifeboat (1944), or Escape from New York (1981), or Ray Liotta's future-jungle prison romp, No Escape (1994), or Bladerunner (1982) -- can we watch?

Well, if you're me: A LOT!

I've done 'em all (and written reviews for most). From Hyper Space (1989; with Lynn Holly Johnson and Don Stroud), to Alien Intruder (1993; with Billy Dee Williams and Maxwell Caulfield), to Lifepod (1993; with Joe Penny and Kristeine DeBell), to Galaxis (1995; with Brigette Neilson), to Within the Rock (1996; with Brian Krause and Xander Berkeley), to Inhumanoid (1996 ; with Richard Grieco), to Assault on Dome 4 (1996; with Bruce Campbell and Brion James), to the production quartet-connected The Apocalypse (1997), Convict 762 (1997), Dark Planet (1997), and Timelock (1996; each co-starring the welcomed Frank Zagarino in some capacity), to any Oliver Gruner '90s space actioner, to the French-made The Survivor (1998; with Richard Moll), to -- now -- Phoenix (1996).

Why am I am doing this to myself?

Well, you take one for the team when you have Brad Dourif (uh-huh, of Dune) Billy Drago (the great mob flick, The Untouchables and Chuck Norris flicks, but of Convict 762), and William Sanderson (Bladerunner, uh-huh) as the bad guys, along with Denise Duff (Charles Band's Bloodstone series) as our resident damsel, and Steven Nicols (Witchboard; TV's Days of Our Lives) as our resident Snake Pliskken. But he's named Tyler McClain because, well, a little Die Hard (1996) homage can't hurt.

So, McClain gets the old free-pass from prison gag to put together a "dirty dozen" -- with Brad Dourif as the resident military advisor (cue Paul Riser) -- to storm the android-terrorist captured mining colony of Titus 4. Oh, and Billy Drago's Cyrus Kilgore (geeze, the names in these films), pulls the strings as a corporate-mafia "cleaner" to protect the mining company assets -- so, yes, this does sound a little like Roland Emmerich's infinitely better, pretty fine knock off, Moon 44 (1990; with Michael Pare). Anyway, amid the plastic rifle fire in a rundown California factory of pipes and metal stairways (Alien Intruder shot in an abandoned Oscar Mayer plant) -- as we clip whole scenes from Aliens (this, time, those scanner-beeps track the androids) -- it turns out the whole android takeover is a double-cross: Billy Drago is in charge of the android-robots and Dourif is his minion. Yep, ol' Cyrus wants to drive down the company's stock so he can buy the company, cheap.

It turns out -- speaking of "production connected films," in this case, of the John McTiernan variety -- producer Jimmy Lifton's short-lived Traid Productions made both, Phoenix and Assault of Dome 4. Are you up to popping in both films to see what sets and props are repurposed? No, way. Once is enough with either film for me -- especially Assault on Dome 4. Geeze, Ash. What were you thinking? Bills were piling up and a buck is a buck?

In the end, the always likable and welcomed Dourif, Drago, and Sanderson inspire you watch -- and keep you engaged against an effective, against-the-budget production design by James Scanlon. Luckily, we're mostly dealing with Scanlon's well-done interiors with very minimal space ship exteriors (which are in-camera miniatures against plates and are better than most when it comes to these films). Director-screenwriter Troy Cook has been around the block, all the back to the popular rentals Slave Girls from Beyond Infinity (1987), Big Bad Mama II (1987), and Waxwork II: Lost in Time (1992) as an assistant cameraman. His joint script with producer Jimmy Lifton is smart, replete with lots of AI and tech-talk but, as result of the budget; we're very exposition heavy as we drift into a talky morality play about android rights and feelings.

Apparently, Phoenix was successful enough in the international video and cable markets to inspire a sequel -- by way of Fred Olen Ray's Cyberzone (1995; with Mark Singer from 1991's likeminded Dead Space) being reissued as Phoenix II, in 1996. Now, that film, also known as Droid Gunner (uh-huh, Bladerunner), concerns a bounty hunter assigned to track smuggled androids, thus the part deux suffix-shuffle.

If you want the heads-up on more of the same flicks, check out B&S About Movies' "Movies in Outer Space" tribute week.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What Hogwash
IMDBcinephile11 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Troy Cook, a relatively obscure director, has brought to screen an exercise in discrepancies between plot time. It is a roller-coaster ride - if afterwards you throw up due to how nauseating it is. It is also a movie that is so mishmash into an oblivion, stitched together with not even a modicum of delicate care and characters rather odious and inasmuch as you can handle them it's the only thing that is focused and transfixed on. I swear I had a paucity of care through the first 45mins of running time that was consumed with such things as Brad Dourif's hamfisted acting, terrible one-liners, and talk of something between the organic and artificial side of the brain; all (cause and effect) mustered through a shoot out of people locating mine fields...

The movie is so unpleasant and noxious. It stars Billy Drago as Kilgore, Reiger played by Dourif, and another bunch of people trying to outweigh a lot of the story by trying to "track down" forensically to find out how these killers got into the 'Titus 4', but also why they didn't use it to great avail.

The plot centers on these people who infiltrated a base killing people at a monitor, and then becoming android leaders. Meanwhile, spectators try to analyze the problem, and then some troops are deployed under the authority of Reiger to try and rescind the peace and take over the "evil head of the corporation" for their useless and badly prompted attempt at taking over the galaxy!! And I'm not sure about the rest because I found the movie rather hard to watch... My cut off point was an hour in. However, I'm sure all it consisted of was jumbled up fighting scenes involving characters such as Kilgore getting unintentionally shot and then we have to be inspired to care through nothing, but screen time forcing us to watch it. Naturally I fell out of place, and switched it off.

The framing is akin to "The Langoliers" in it that space looks like a hub for everybody to get jacked up to an LSD drug and take hits from; it's not like Space at all; it's more like a subconscious version of Space that you might dream up when you're somnolent.

It is a bunch of exposition and orders barked out by the lamest guy on earth, hamming it up and arbitrarily hating one of his comrades as a form of superiority. It is like a little kid fighting, and it's not even given clear cut depth. And yet Brad Dourif is such a revered actor, and has put himself into a movie that he has fortunately not been slandered from because no human being on earth has practically watched it.

The dialogue is tenuous as expected; like Butch not being much of a man and then getting his head plonked right off a bar in prison. And the reason they're in prison is because... they were bad? You know, the cryptic nature of the film mixed with the almost bogus scope and unbearably cheap production values, are only the effortless attempt to make this movie a rip off of such things like "Battle Galantica", "Star Trek" and even "2001: A Space Odyssey" with the way they focus on mini extraterrestrial entities (Space Odyssey is one of my favorite movies by who I consider to be one of the greatest directors; the other two I'm not a fan of, but it proves how terrible an experiment this movie was).

If you're expecting some of the vibes to reflect on the 90's, don't buy this. If you're an eager Sci-Fi collector then you might like this - but I also like Sci-Fi and this is just the nadir of Sci-Fi and narrative, so if you just watch Sci-Fi for the thrill of watching explosions and listen to terrible one-liners (ones that Joss Whedon's "Firefly" a much better programme, would be sickened by) then you will like it. If you enjoy extemporaneous fighting scenes then by all means.

... Sorry. I apologize for tally marking the statistics. I don't think anybody would really like this movie.... ANYBODY. But if you do, it's none of my business.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beat my Expectations
tom-138230 May 2006
When I first discovered this film on a DVD that came free with a newspaper, my initial thoughts were a little negative. It didn't look like it would be particularly good, although I was drawn by the name of William Sanderson who I had seen in Babylon 5 and thought was very good in that.

So after five months, I picked up the DVD and began watching with very low expectations of the film itself. I was met by a film with some excellent acting, quality writing, a gripping plot and frequent action. The only aspect of the film that disappointed me was the special effects, which looked more like they came from 1965 than 1995. Besides that an excellent film with excellent qualities and a truly appalling sequel that I prefer to pretend doesn't exist.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed