Dust Devil (1992) Poster

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
75 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A worthy viewing for discriminating viewers.
Hey_Sweden19 April 2014
"Dust Devil" is an intriguing, moody little genre film, marked by very fine acting and the kind of atmosphere one can only get in practical locations. In this case, the setting is the Namibian desert, and that adds a lot to the story and presentation. The ambiance is practically overwhelming; writer / director Richard Stanley ("Hardware") nicely captures on film a world that not that many of us get to see. Aided by a truly haunting music score by Simon Boswell, he does an excellent job at keeping the viewer uneasy yet interested in everything that happens on screen. The surrealism is top notch, and Stanley keeps the special effects work at a minimum. Overall, this is actually a better film than "Hardware", if not entirely satisfying; the script is indeed somewhat muddled. The characters are worth watching, with likable protagonists and a creepy antagonist.

The under-rated Robert John Burke stars as the title character, a spirit trapped in a human body who must kill in order to gain access to another realm. He makes the acquaintance of Wendy (Chelsea Field), who was unhappy in her marriage and has run away. Tracking Wendy is her concerned husband Mark (Rufus Swart), while The Dust Devil is pursued by haunted cop Ben Mukurob (the late, great South African actor Zakes Mokae, whom you may recognize as the villain from Wes Cravens' "The Serpent and the Rainbow".

Adding even more intrigue to Stanley's tale is the fact that he based it on the case of a real- life serial killer in the area who was never caught, or even identified, leading to speculations about a possible supernatural origin. The director blends African mythology with the serial killer and otherworldly elements, not to mention a love for the Western genre, to great effect. The fact that Wendy and Ben are such sad people adds much pathos; if Ben can be considered a hero, then he's definitely a tragic one. It's easy for the viewer to feel sympathy towards this character. Field and Mokae beautifully perform their parts, and Burke is deliciously sinister. Adding solid support is another departed great character actor William Hootkins, who'd acted in "Hardware" and appears here as Bens' superior. Delivering the exposition in an entertaining way is John Matshikiza, who's magnetic as Joe.

The heavily edited American release of "Dust Devil" really did it no favours; the subsequent reviews then motivated American distributor Miramax to put little effort into promoting it, which further prevented this film from reaching the audience that it deserved. If you are able, track down the multi disc Subversive DVD release (which also includes a few Stanley documentaries, the work print of the film, and the soundtrack on CD); you can then see this offbeat effort the way it was intended.

Seven out of 10.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
All we are is Dust in the Wind ...
Coventry29 March 2009
"Dust Devil is one of the only 90's horror classics!" "The special edition DVD from Subversive Cinema is finally a release worthy of this film". "If you haven't seen Dust Devil yet, you're in for a brilliant and refreshing horror surprise". Okay, these are some of the ultimately praising comments I encountered on "Dust Devil" and apparently a lot of people are astonished if you claim you're a horror fanatic and yet haven't seen this film. Now, after borrowing the deluxe DVD-edition from a friend and finally having seen the film, all I can say is … Is that it?!? This is the supposedly brilliant and original 90's classic that I desperately had to watch in order to keep calling myself a horror buff? I mean, it's a respectable and ambitious film and definitely benefices from a handful of unique elements, but I honestly expected more in terms of plot originality and production values. "Dust Devil" boosts an incredibly rudimentary and hugely derivative plot, but writer/director Richard Stanley ("Hardware") effectively camouflages this through sensationally breath-taking filming locations, ultimately ominous sound effects & music and some extremely blatant gore effects. Filmed in one of the most beautiful regions of the world – the South African/Namibian deserts, "Dust Devil" introduces a drifting stranger who gets picked up by a beautiful woman and brought back to an isolated guest house for a night of passionate sex. However, the drifter is an ancient demoniacal African shape-shifter feeding on the despair of depressed people and thus viciously butchers the woman and sets her house on fire before hitching onwards. Next victim is the insecure South African housewife Wendy Robinson, who finally dared to leave her dominant husband and now journeys through the desert on her way to the sea. Meanwhile, the fatigue police officer Ben Mukurob hasn't got the slightest trace to follow and enlists the help of a spiritual cinema projector to learn more about the unusual serial killer. Basically, "Dust Devil" is simply a standard horror story about a traveling serial killer and all the supernatural gibberish and typically African talk about magic are totally irrelevant. The film is amazingly atmospheric and often downright scary, but only thanks to the godforsaken and desolate locations and nightmarish music, because all the rest is disappointingly amateurish. The narration, for example, is completely uninformative and quite annoying. Stanley's subtly processed lectures on South African politics feel somewhat obtrusive whereas the actually relevant dialogs are extremely weak. Worst of all, however, are the irredeemably awful acting performances from the ensemble cast. I personally never liked Robert John Burke but definitely expected a better and more vivid job from Chelsea Field.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"We've got just about everything here, evisceration, partial cremation, sexual mutilation & possibly even cannibalism." It's looks nice...
poolandrews23 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Dust Devil is set in Namibia where after a row with her husband Marco (Rufus Swart) a woman named Wendy (Chelsea Field) finds herself driving through, not going anywhere in particular she is just trying to escape her unhappy marriage. While driving along the desolate Namibian desert highways she comes across a hitchhiker (Robert John Burke) & decides to stop & give him a lift. It's a decision Wendy will regret as it turns out the hitchhiker is in fact an ancient evil spirit known as a Dust Devil who survives by killing people & Wendy is as good a victim as anyone else. The Dust Devil's murderous activities aren't going unnoticed however & local cop Ben Mukurob (Zakes Mokae) is on his trial but will he make it in time to save Wendy?

This British South African co-production was written & directed by Richard Stanley & is an unusual supernatural horror thriller. I have to say at this point that Dust Devil annoyingly exists in several different versions including a studio cut which is the one I saw, a director's cut & a workprint cut so while I might praise the 90 odd minute studio version I saw that doesn't automatically mean you'll watch the same one. In fact you could end up watching a version which is significantly different in both tone & content than the one I will be basing my comment on which will make make my comment completely pointless & irrelevant to you. Anyway, the script takes itself very seriously unlike a lot of horror from the 90's & while that gives it a certain gravity it does try to be a little too straight faced at times. The story is actually very interesting & absorbing with good character's, dialogue & thoughtful situations but I didn't like some of it's more supernatural overtones like the way the hitchhiker just vanished from inside Wendy's car & who was that other hitchhiker by the side of the road during the same scene anyway? Some of the black magic witchcraft mumbo jumbo was a bit heavy handed somewhat off putting at times & came across as silly as well. It's not a fast moving film, even this the shorter 90 odd minute studio cut, but it entertains & it's engaging & quite thought provoking so overall I didn't mind that it was a little slow going at times.

Director Stanley does a great job here & Dust Devil has to be one of the most visually stylish horror flicks of the 90's, the colours, the frame compositions, from aerial shots to long camera tracking shots this is a visually rich film. The bright orange & red Namibian desert adds a lot to the look of the film & the ghost town at the end is cool with most of the buildings half full of sand. I wouldn't say Dust Devil is scary but it's sort of eerie at times, since most of it takes place during the bright sunlight of daytime there isn't a whole lot of atmosphere. Gore wise things are sparse, there's an autopsy scene with various body parts, some severed fingers, a quick shot of a dead body with the upper skin on it's face pulled back & probably the best 'head blown off with a shotgun' scene ever. There's some sex & nudity as well if that sort of thing interests you.

With a supposed budget of about £4,300,000 this actually had a lot of money spent on it, in fact if you were to convert that into dollars we're talking about a $8 million flick which is pretty big budget even now yet alone 15 years ago. Shot on location in Namibia this is well made with good special effects, production values, stylish cinematography & atmospheric music. The acting is good from all involved although some of the South African accents can take a bit of getting used to.

Dust Devil is a good horror film, it's something with more intelligence & style than a lot of sequel driven franchise 90's horror, had this been a bit clearer on a few plot points & had a bit more gore in it then this could have been a classic, as it is it's still very good but not brilliant.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cryptic, bloody, fascinating
angelynx27 December 1998
Very dark, gory, mystical film with strong, haunting atmosphere, much in the spirit of Stanley's work for occultist rock band Fields of the Nephilim. A demonic entity hitchhikes across the desert taking possession of bodies with which to commit ritualistic murders - the crime scenes, their walls minutely detailed with glyphs and sigils painted in the victims' blood, are stunningly effective. Skeptical detective finally enlists the help of an old shaman who knows the creature's vulnerabilities and the killer is stopped - or is it? --Really remarkable; anyone who enjoyed Stanley's earlier "Hardware" should make the effort to find it.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-Made But Vague Supernatural Horror...
EVOL66620 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
After reading several glowing reviews for DUST DEVIL, I guess I was expecting a bit more. I will admit that visually it is a strong film, but the storyline and "action" of the film often felt confused and slow.

A shape-shifting drifter who feeds on the souls of desperate and suicidal people comes into contact with a woman who recently left her husband, and an officer on his trail for the brutal murder of his previous victims. The games begin when the drifter hitches a ride with the aforementioned woman, and as the officer begins to piece together the natural and supernatural elements of the case...

DUST DEVIL is a strong film in terms of a relatively unknown and low-budget horror/thriller - but the pacing is often slow and plodding and makes what othewise could have been a nearly great film into a merely good one. Nothing to really complain about in terms of acting or the overall production quality - but again, the slow middle portion of the film made it hard to hold interest through to the end. The relatively anti-climactic ending wasn't really anything to write home about either. Worth checking out, but I can say I was extremely impressed...7/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
'Dust Devil' (1992)
mfnmbvp22 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Very unknown and definitely very under appreciated early 90's horror film, revolving around a particularly unique idea, and a particularly unique villain at that. The film is definitely a slow-burner, Richard Stanley's final cut clocking in at around two hours long. Not saying that is an entirely bad thing, but there are moments when the film drags its feet.

The film is slightly sparse on the dialogue, giving way to let the haunting musical score do most of the talking. The visuals speak on their own terms as well, the African sunset to an abandoned movie theater in the middle of the desert filled with sand, the film comes off as some kind of bizarre western. The acting isn't anything to brag about, but it is definitely of a very high caliber for horror movies, although 'Dust Devil' is so ripe with slow-moving action, I would almost not even consider it horror at all. Inspired probably by 'El Topo' and probably did inspire films like Larry Fessenden's 'Wendigo' just a little bit, 'Dust Devil' has a very unique story behind it, which is probably the film's strongest point.

Zekes Mokae is probably most notable as the detective, and he definitely outshines Chelsea Field, and Robert John Burke as the 'Dust Devil' himself. All in all, recommended for the horror buff who can tolerate slow-moving melodrama and a good story to back up their thrills.

DUST DEVIL -----7/10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Going in the ... wind
kosmasp11 August 2020
Or was it gone with the dust? Nah, probably not. But there is quite some dust here to ... dust off. The making of this and generally the story behind the making of this is more fascinating than the movie itself. Which isn't bad at all whatsoever. A really interesting thriller slash horror slash paranormal movie. The director does believe in certain things and to fully appreciate the movie you should at least be open to the while thing. Even if just for entertainemnt and the film purposes! Don't be close minded, don't rip the fun out, before you even watch it.

Having said that, really nice cast overall and good performances. I watched the final cut and the even longer cut, that had many scenes included in badly repaired or restoreds scenes. And if you try to listen to the audio commentary ... daymn. One would think that with technology nowadays, they could record it so you can clearly hear a person - and not have background noise that is seriously annoying.

All that aside, it is a fine movie, with an interesting story to boast. Maybe if the producers would have trusted the director more, there could have been an even better picture overall. Maybe he wasn't there yet anyway - whatever the case Richard Stanley is quite the individual and his movies are unique in many ways
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A total misfire!
Maciste_Brother17 November 2004
Being a big fan of HARDWARE, Richard Stanley's previous film, I really wanted to see DUST DEVIL for some time now. Having heard all the bad press about it did not diminish my interest in seeing it because HARDWARE got a lot of bad press and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Well, after watching DUST DEVIL, I have to say that the bad press was on the mark. DUST DEVIL is a total misfire. I know there's a so-called uncut version out there but even an uncut version couldn't change the fact that the acting is terrible, the story is extremely weak and predictable and the whole concept is badly executed. Nothing feels right. While HARDWARE was pitch perfect with its techno noir Apocalyptic mood, everything in DUST DEVIL is totally off kilter. It's an embarrassing film, with every little detail wrong, from the awful soundtrack to the editing to the camera-work, giving the movie a super cheap, low budget feel that makes Roger Corman films look like BEN HUR.

What's remarkable about how bad DUST DEVIL is is how quickly I realized it sucked. From the first frame, everything went wrong because of one thing: the narration. The narration is extremely intrusive, pointless and annoying. The voice-over keeps telling us what's going on. You know a movie is in trouble when it needs a voice-over to explain to the viewers the very predictable story and character motivations. Then we see the evil man taking pictures of his soon-to-be victims with a polaroid instant camera. I mean, come on! What a freaking lame and clichéd idea. There's absolutely no thought or imagination put in the evil being's ways. A polaroid? Everything went downhill after that. I mean, REALLY downhill.

DUST DEVIL is terrible. I can't claim it's a botched masterpiece like many reviews here seem to say because most of it is lame to start with. Needless to say, as bad as DUST DEVIL is, I still think HARDWARE is amazing.
17 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A shapeshifting demon haunting the sun soaked desert roads n looking for miserable souls is truly eldritch.
Fella_shibby14 July 2019
I first saw this in the mid 90s on a vhs. Revisited it recently. The film is about a shape-shifting demon (Robert John Burke) who gains power through ritual murders n has to keep moving to work the rituals mainly targetting only those who have nothing to live for. Of course he does get to sleep with attractive females, including Chelsea Field. This film has a very creepy feel throughout n the desert roads along with the house where the first murder takes place has a very isolated n eerie feel. The director did a fantastic job. This film has awesome photography of the desert.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A sadly underrated haunting film
tony-greig19 July 2006
This film starts with a haunting introduction, with a equally haunting film score, which leads into a sadistic murder before the "devil" moves on to trap more victims. The sad, lonely and displaced are all vulnerable and ultimately selected as victims. Magical witchcraft plays a role in trapping the devil, who will ultimately continue his shape shifting, taking on the guise of a new host to move on along the never ending path of death. This film is imaginative, well scripted, violent yet compelling. It is haunting visually, and musically. It leaves room for expanding the characterisations which it does well. It would have benefited from being half an hour longer, yet stands out as a classic cult drama of great intelligence.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Average horror
tresdodge17 October 2004
Part Produced by the Weinstein brothers, who brought us Pulp Fiction etc, and distributed by their company Miramax, this film was released in the U.S under the name 'Demonica'. This cut of the movie was one that the director and writer Richard Stanley was very unhappy with. When the company responsible for distributing the movie in England went into administration 'Demonica' became the only cut of this film. That was until Richard Stanley financed a re-cut eventually getting his cut released in selected cinemas in Britain.

The story revolves around the dust devil, a man dressed in cowboy attire who roams the earth killing 'innocent' people in order that eventually he may be able to return to 'the other side'. Now in Namibia he is hitch hiking around killing freely those who are unfortunate enough to give him a ride

Although providing nice photography and some stark images the film looks very dated and is definitely not the masterpiece others have claimed it to be. It is quite entertaining at times but overall does not keep you interested for long. It is a horror, that does'nt scare and at times is quite funny and silly.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
HAUNTING
dogstar6665 September 2003
If there ever was a film which deserved to be called HAUNTING - it's this one. Excellent music, wonderful dream-like atmosphere, masochistically-grim mood verging on nihilism, mystical overtones, a sympathetic supernatural yet human 'villain'... it's just wonderful. Disturbing gore, genuinely creepy scenes, the setting unlike anything you've ever seen before- this is one of the unsung, unknown masterpieces of the '90-ies (thinking/feeling man's)horror film at its best.
39 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Neat-o,
Samiam330 April 2010
This is a review of the final cut.

Richard's Stanley's follow up to Hardware (his feature debut) is a feast of sights and sounds which bridge the gap between horror and art film. A truly eccentric and imaginative film. Hardware itself was fairly impressive visually, but here, Stanley offers us a story, which feels less brain dead. This one is deeper and more subtle and also orchestrated to be almost hypnotic. Pretty good for an extreme B-movie, which is too degrading a classification for something like this. It'll offer a treat for anyone who is curious.

The curtain rises on a dusty golden world of desert. A voice of god narration tells us we are in Africa. there is an ancient evil wandering the Namib desert, in human form. He preys on souls, most of whom he hitches a ride from on the desert highway. Wendy has recently left her husband in South Africa, she hits the road with nothing but the clothes on her back. (No points for guessing who she runs into on her trip.)

I may offer a few points for guessing what happens to her, but there are times in fact when the plot is not all that predictable. Dust Devil, is a fairly original story even though there are a couple of road movie clichés. It would be wrong and too bias to look at Dust Devil as a road movie, it plays out like one for a while, but it's impossible to label it as one genre. It's part road movie, part horror, part fantasy, and part surrealism. An odd mix, yes but it all comes together effectively.

the film is not without fault though. There is a voice of god narration from one of the film's less important characters. It is badly scripted and feels unnecessary. The ending though, not terrible is anti-climactic. Perhaps it's different in another cut of the film, but I doubt it.

There is much more worth being said about Dirt Devil, but I don't want to over sell it. If you feel sick of the regurgitated mass of b-movie horror material, Here is a change of pace, a film that is worth checking out. (If you can find it that is). It's a rare one.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
And the award for Best Performance in a Richard Stanley Film goes to... Namibia.
BA_Harrison29 October 2021
Richard Stanley's directorial debut Hardware was a stylish piece of plagiarism that failed to do the source material justice (Stanley ripped off the story from a 'Future Shock' in UK comic 2000AD); Dust Devil, his second feature, is also extremely stylish, and might even have been derived from an original concept, but it also proves disappointing overall, the muddled script relying on trite tribal mysticism to paper over the cracks, and the acting suffering from strong African accents (it's hard to tell if they're lousy actors or if the dialect just gives this impression).

In Namibia, young women driving alone on deserted highways are apparently all too happy to pick up hitch-hikers: the film's 'dust devil', a shape-shifting demon (Robert John Burke) that takes human form to claim the souls of desperate people, is picked up by a woman, who takes him back to her place for sex. He snaps her neck, does unspeakable things to her corpse, and decorates the house with her blood, before torching the place. Policeman Ben Mukurob (Zakes Mokae) tries to track down the killer, who has left a trail of bodies in his wake, but will he be able to destroy the demon before it takes the life of Wendy Robinson (Chelsea Field), the latest idiot to give a lift to the hitch-hiker in the middle of nowhere.

The film's magical mumbo-jumbo, portentous voice-over, and arthouse sensibilities turn what could have been an entertaining supernatural chiller into something of a pretentious slog, with only the stunning cinematography and the occasional spot of gore alleviating the boredom: the desolate sun-baked landscape of Namibia is quite breath-taking - far more remarkable than any of the human performers - and the violent imagery, which includes a splendid shotgun blast to the head in the final act, is impressively nasty when it occurs.

Available in various edits due to a troubled history with producers and distributors, Dust Devil is probably best appreciated with the Final Cut, in which Stanley had the final say; it's almost two hours long, but is probably the most coherent version of a film that is fairly muddled at the best of times.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flawed but fascinating in places. Worth watching.
Infofreak28 August 2002
'Dust Devil' is a visually striking, atmospheric supernatural mood piece that deserves a larger audience. Directed by Richard Stanley, best known to most for the so-so cyberpunk action movie 'Hardware', this is a much more ambitious and complex movie. Unfortunately it isn't entirely successful, and frequently loses focus and gets muddled and confusing. Even so it has some fascinating sequences and is well worth renting. The mysterious title character is played by the underrated Robert John Burke, and actor who has had an uneven career from Hal Hartley gems like 'Simple Men' to horror schlock like 'Thinner', and even a brief stint as Peter Weller's replacement in the Robocop series. Burke is supported by the charismatic African character actor Zakes Mokae ('The Serpent and the Rainbow'), and b-grade regular Chelsea Field ('Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man'). 'Dust Devil' is a difficult movie to categorize but will appeal to fans of offbeat and strange films.
28 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Impressive Dark Fantasy
extravaluejotter14 June 2007
I hated Richard Stanley's "Hardware", an overlong, overwrought sci-fi horror flick based on a 2-page comic cut from "2000AD". However, I had to admit that it WAS visually stylish and watched "Dust Devil" after it was recommended to me by a friend. I watched it and was duly converted into a Stanley fan. Why has this man made so few films?

In "Dust Devil", Stanley's screen writing skill and directorial flair combine perfectly and the result is an above-average horror movie. The African locations provide a perfect backdrop to a tale that is as grisly as it is poignant. The director's cut is a must-see for horror fans and Simon Boswell's pounding soundtrack is wonderfully evocative. Highly recommended.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slow, but beautiful, western horror
Shattered_Wake12 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
After leaving her abusive, purple-track-suit-wearing husband, Wendy (Chelsea Field) encounters a mysterious hitchhiker (Robert Burke). She invites him along for the ride, but realizes her mistake when strange things begin to occur after he joins her. Meanwhile, a police officer (Zakes Mokae) asks the help of a local shaman to find the hitchhiker, who is more than he appears to be.

Review: The film was not at all what I expected. Reading the synopsis and hearing nothing of it beforehand, I had assumed something like a supernatural version of 'The Hitcher'. . . with that same tone to it. While I do prefer 'The Hitcher' to this film, 'Dust Devil' does not deserve to be entirely passed up. It's beautifully shot with a strange, but interesting, story about the myths in the real world. It is rather slow-moving for quite some time, but during the times it picks up, it's rather frightening and gory. The performances are fantastic, as is the written dialogue. My major gripe would have to be, again, with the pace. Not so much that it's slow, but that its spikes are so high and brutal that when it reaches its lulls, it feels boring in comparison. However, if you're one simply for the visuals, for the landscapes, for the cinematography. . . you will very much appreciate the beauty of the film. Who knows. . . it might've been great in one of the sliced-up editions. But the 'final cut' edition I viewed was, simply, just good.

Final verdict: 7.25/10.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
not for me
trashgang6 February 2014
I just seen the longest version available of Dust Devil and I was looking forward to finally see it but at the end I wasn't that happy because to be honest, it wasn't my cup of tea. I had seen Hardware (1990) simply because Carl McCoy (Fields Of The Nephilim) had a role in it. Hardware I did like and Dust Devil you can feel the same atmosphere so typical for director Richard Stanley but it's the story that let me down.

I was told that it was full of gory moments and it do has a few of those moments and it even got news footage of dead bodies but it's a slow moving flick. It starts well with the dust devil slashing his victim and cutting the body in pieces, the effects used are all well and I thought that it would be a hell of a ride but all I saw were nice shoots made by Richard and somehow I was lost with the story and was looking to nature. Now and then it did offer the mentioned gore but by then for me it was too late.

Nevertheless it's a flick with much following and loved by many but for me it had too many boring moments.

Gore 1,5/5 Nudity 1/5 Effects 3/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As bad as it gets
gzeka5 January 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie on a shelf and had a look at its cover. Story seemed pretty interesting and I went home with this movie. What a mistake to make! This movie is absolute waste,a full-time duck. Opening is nice, narrator explains the story about "Dust Devil" hitchiking across the Namib Desert in South Africa. Then everything went wrong. It seems that the director couldn't decide who's the main character,so most of the movie is focused on Chelsea Field solving her domestic problems,with occasional pop-ups from Robert John Burke and Zakes Mokae. There is absolutely no pace,no rhythm in this film,it looks like this was made for those with insomnia problem. Acting is cheesy,most of the actors look like a vagrants who were accidentally involved in this charade. I'm a huge horror fan but this is a disgrace for the genre.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Poetic Brutality.
hitchcockthelegend2 October 2009
After a blazing argument with her husband and deciding enough is enough, Wendy Robinson takes off into the African sun. Picking up a hitch-hiker, she finds herself strangely drawn to him, unaware that he is a travelling serial killer. When police detective Ben Mukurob arrives on the scene it becomes apparent that her companion is actually something far worse than a merely a killer, he is a shape shifting demon who steals the souls of his victims.

Richard Stanley's "Dust Devil" has a well documented troubled history. Briefly, Stanley's original cut of 120 minutes was trimmed to 110 and US distributor Miramax held the rights to re-edit an American release if they so wished. Stanley still hoped his longer cut would thrive in Europe, however, Palace Pictures in Britain had a 95 minute cut of the film that was test screened just the once before Palace Pictures went bankrupt. Thus this meant the post-production of a "European" version was shut down and Stanley lost control of the film. With Miramax chopping away in the states it now meant that "Dust Devil" was floating around in cuts that ranged from 110 minutes to a staggeringly pointless 68 minutes. In 1993 Stanley managed to buy back the print and the cut material from Miramax, and using his own money, set about restoring the film to something like his original vision. The result is that now a widely available DVD box set has two cuts of the film to view, The Final Cut and the (rough) Work Print.

With so many versions of the film around over the years, it's hard to gauge what a true weighted rating the picture has. Personally I feel sure that if judged solely on the "Final Cut" version the film would be better regarded and rated far better than some of its internet scores. That's not to say it's a perfect film, for it's not, some problems exist, and the flow of the film, even by Richard Stanley's own admission, is far from fluent these days. However, it's one hell of a fine movie, technically stunning and with a horror story of deep cranial worth. Starring Robert Burke (Devil), Chelsea Field (Wendy) and Zakes Mokae (Ben), "Dust Devil" has three interwoven character plots dovetailing together towards the apocalyptic finale. Along the way we are treated to much dialogue cloaked in haunting mysticism, with dashes of grim horror that assault the senses. It's a pic that begs revisits to truly appreciate the complexity of it, never mind that the visuals alone are worth seeing time and time again. It will remain a divisive film, of that I don't think there is any doubt, yet I would urge any genre fan who hasn't seen it to at least give it a go. You may not be as impressed with it as myself and its many fans are, but one feels you are unlikely to forget having ever seen it. Mesmerising, haunting and even lyrical, it's hoped that the film in its final form will find a more appreciative audience. 9/10
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strong Style Overwhelms Story in an Obtuse Horror Movie
evanston_dad12 August 2014
A bizarre horror movie about a devil in human form who hunts the Australian outback for victims on which to feed.

I give the movie credit for its compelling sense of style -- the filmmakers did not want this to be a run-of-the-mill slasher, and the material is treated far more seriously (and as a result effectively) than it might have been in any number of other versions. But that style is also part of the film's problem. It's so preoccupied with its artsy trappings that it never gets around to telling a compelling story. The narrative moves forward in confusing fits and starts, never grounding the audience thoroughly enough or for long enough at any one time to allow it to care much about what's going on. It does have a satisfyingly creepy ending, I'll give it that much, if you still care about it by the time it comes around.

Grade: B-
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A stylish but weak attempt at an inspiring horror topic
AndreiPavlov2 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Remembering "The Hitcher" and "Jeepers Creepers" - all-time classics - this one has no chance. The villain is not scary. And when he transforms into a character from the notorious Michael Jackson music video, it gets too pathetic. The sex scenes distract our attention from the plot (quite often when the director resorts to such adult material, it is a sign of his falling short on other levels - that's my personal opinion). The narrator's voice in the beginning of the movie adds nothing good. It sounds like a fairy-tale. The characters are not interesting, though they try hard to be.

But the camerawork is fine. The scenes of the desert are very imposing. The burning mansion in the middle of it shot from above makes a scary impression. And the ending of the flick right after the big shot is the best part (though the shot itself and the "wizard" stick are somehow ridiculous).

Hope, there haven't been many spoilers in my review. If you do not consider "The Hitcher" and "Jeepers Creepers" the best of the best in this genre, you may sincerely enjoy "DD". Besides, not sure that there are big numbers of horror art-house flicks made by and in South Africa.

A different cut and cast of the movie could have improved the final product considerably.

Thank you for attention. A 3 out of 10 only from my side.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very atmospheric and visually impressive horror film.
HumanoidOfFlesh1 November 2006
The titular Dust Devil is an evil demon that preys only on those who have lost the reason to live.This includes Wendy,who has broken up with her husband and is now making her way aimlessly across the South African desert.Feeling lonely,she picks up a stray by the name of Hitch and the nightmare begins...Richard Stanley's "Dust Devil" re-interprets the true story of a South African serial killer,known among locals as "Nhadiep".Bizarre ritualistic murders took place in the town of Bethany.The killer who inspired Dust Devil preyed on migrant workers and railways workers."Dust Devil" is a creepy and hypnotic horror film.Richard Stanley of "Hardware" fame relies on the magical elements of the legend of Nhadiep,invoking tribal rituals,witchcraft and Namibian mysticism.There is also a good amount of gore splashed on screen.The cinematography of Namibian desert is absolutely fantastic and there are some striking visuals.A must-see for horror enthusiasts!
23 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Uneven
hellholehorror8 February 2023
This looked beautiful. Everything from the red hues to the optical effects to the amazing sets and massive camera moves. Slightly weaker sound design with cheesy sound effects cues, empty audio-space, poor fidelity and disappointing lack of immersion. The story had some great ideas and some interesting themes raised. Some bits were also really exciting but the massive thing that let this whole film down was the bad pacing. It is just too slow. Too much goes on with nothing happening and then you forget what's going on when something does happen. Very pretty to watch but lacking good pacing, it's too uneven.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Waste of Beautiful Imagery
akermandeniz9 October 2021
After watching this film, I've visited my profile to rate it, and to my surprise, I've found out that I had already seen it, in 2009. Though during the second watch, not a single frame is felt familiar, I thought I was watching it first time; this should tell a thing or two about how forgettable it is.

I won't change my rating no matter how much I enjoyed beautiful and rich imagery. Because the dubbing is horrendous and the whole story does not hang together, even the dream sequences makes more sense.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed