IMDb >
JFK (1991)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsJFK (1991) More at IMDbPro »
| Videos (see all 10 NEW) |
Overview
User Rating:
Release Date:
20 December 1991 (USA) moreTagline:
The Story That Won't Go Away morePlot:
A New Orleans DA discovers there's more to the Kennedy assassination than the official story. full summary | add synopsisAwards:
Won 2 Oscars. Another 10 wins & 20 nominations moreNewsDesk:
(52 articles)
Z Criterion DVD Review (From Collider.com. 1 November 2009, 7:34 AM, PST)
[DVD Review] Natural Born Killers: The Director’s Cut
(From JustPressPlay. 29 October 2009, 2:00 PM, PDT)
User Comments:
A Stunningly Well Planned and Articulated Film more (367 total)Cast
(Cast overview, first billed only)| Sally Kirkland | ... | Rose Cheramie | |
| Anthony Ramirez | ... | Epileptic | |
| Ray LePere | ... | Zapruder | |
| Steve Reed | ... | John F. Kennedy - Double | |
| Jodie Farber | ... | Jackie Kennedy - Double (as Jodi Farber) | |
| Columbia Dubose | ... | Nellie Connally - Double | |
| Randy Means | ... | Gov. Connally - Double | |
| Kevin Costner | ... | Jim Garrison | |
| Jay O. Sanders | ... | Lou Ivon | |
| E.J. Morris | ... | Plaza Witness #1 | |
| Cheryl Penland | ... | Plaza Witness #2 | |
| Jim Gough | ... | Plaza Witness #3 | |
| Perry R. Russo | ... | Angry Bar Patron | |
| Mike Longman | ... | TV Newsman #1 | |
| Edward Asner | ... | Guy Bannister |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
JFK (France)JFK - Affaire non classée (France) (poster title)
Project X (USA) (working title)
more
MPAA:
Rated R for language. (also 1992 edited version)Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsRuntime:
189 min | USA:206 min (director's cut)Language:
EnglishAspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 moreSound Mix:
Dolby SRCertification:
Finland:K-12 | Canada:13+ (Quebec) | Canada:A (Nova Scotia) | Canada:AA (Ontario) | Canada:PG (Manitoba) (TV rating) | Iceland:12 | Brazil:14 | Singapore:NC-16 (re-rating) | Singapore:PG (original rating) (cut) | Argentina:13 | Australia:M | Chile:14 | Finland:K-11 (DVD rating) | Germany:12 (bw) | Netherlands:12 | Norway:11 | South Korea:15 | Spain:13 | Sweden:11 | UK:15 | USA:R (No. 31561)Fun Stuff
Goofs:
Errors made by characters (possibly deliberate errors by the filmmakers): During his closing argument Jim Garrison misspeaks the famous phrase, "Of the people, by the people, and for the people." He instead says, "Of the people, for the people, and by the people." moreMovie Connections:
Referenced in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer: I Only Have Eyes for You (#2.19)" (1998) moreSoundtrack:
Tribal Consciousness moreFAQ
What Happened To Kennedy's Brain?Did LBJ Really Say 'Just let me get elected, and then you can have your war'?
Who Was William O' Keefe?
more
more (367 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for JFK (1991) moreRecommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| I banchieri di Dio | Watchmen | The Manchurian Candidate | The Pelican Brief | Malcolm X |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Biography section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |






Oliver Stone is undoubtedly one of the most controversial directors of all time, his work has included horrifyingly real stories of Vietnam, stories of the corruption of politics and a much-despised account of Jim Morrison's life. No matter the subject matter, Stone always gives it his all and sometimes the world's response is positive and sometimes it's negative. With JFK we are faced with one of his films that was probably one of his most successful (next to Platoon of 1986). This is a rare instance in which the public loved the concept of conspiracy in their own country, and took special interest in the debates that it caused amongst the government upon release. The best thing about this film is that it is and was treated as so much more than a film. My honest opinion is that this response was created not because of a more plausible theory but because of Stone's fantastic and unique job putting the story together.
The film opens on a surprisingly suspenseful scene of the murder of John F. Kennedy. The chopped style of the scene lets you know that something is not right, dramatic black and white shots spliced with the blurry grain shots of the home video taken by a witness (it won Academy Awards for Best Film Editing and Best Cinematography). This, accompanied by John Williams' excellent original score helped do an excellent job of creating a mood, just for this very first scene. Often times a director will stop after this, give it his all for style and then stop after the first scene, but Stone doesn't do this. He makes the film so much more than a boring investigation; he takes you in to each of the puzzle pieces (indeed, it feels like you're with Kevin Costner "digging" through hundreds of events.) For 90% of these clips that lace the film's concepts together, the camera is not kept steady, it is, indeed, like you are there witnessing it. The human eye doesn't only look at what is important, and a situation of trauma can make everything seem broken, confused. Oliver Stone doesn't try to make sure you understand what's going on. Some frown upon this, but it's realistic and that's what counts.
Kevin Costner plays Jim Garrison, the district attorney of New Orleans who investigates the murder of John Kennedy. Sometimes you are expected to disagree (at first) with some of Garrison's presumptuous statements, and when you do there is always at least one character around who will agree with you. Stone realizes most viewers aren't devoted enough to believe everything Garrison says no matter what it is throughout the film. Stone has said that he wants people to "rethink history" and that this film is not guaranteed fact, but an "alternate myth" to the myth that has been presented before. The story is not solid because very few ideas or people or events in life are. What I mean to say is that Garrison's comments are not necessarily ridiculous, it's just a matter of how hard he tries to support them. The focus constantly changes -- yes, Costner will smile a bit when he makes a ridiculous remark that everyone rolls their eyes at, yes, even at the end of the film some clips will be left unchecked, and yes, you will see that there is no way that the question "who killed JFK" is answered as simply, solidly, and, dare I say it, Hollywood-esquely as a one man killing. If you watch this movie looking for real life, without dramatization and without guaranteed entertainment and fun, you will be impressed. This is not a popcorn movie.
And finally a word should be said about the actors' enhancement of the realism of the film. Most notable are Joe Pesci as the frantic David Ferrie who pretends to be a victim but truly (we see) had much more to do with it than he pretends (although convincingly was not an assassin -- he blows the whole thing out of proportion "this is too f*cking big for you, you know that?") and Tommy Lee Jones as the wry ring leader Claw Shaw, who seems to be a pompous upscale member of society that has been doing the dark business of conspiracy behind closed doors. The fact that these characters can appear real to us and not just appear as familiar actors taking on a role (as you might feel in Ocean's Eleven) truly does the film justice in driving it forward.
This is in fact one of my top three favorite movies, but I tend to refrain from mentioning it as just this to my friends-- I'm sooner to mention Memento or Fight Club. The reason for this is that the movie is almost an acquired taste, and certainly not normal entertainment for a teenager. It's honestly written for a generation above me, but everything that makes it (up to and including the "kings are killed" and other political themes) are intriguing to me, and for me anything intriguing grows to be a favorite. Even if the subject is not something that ever really impacted me, I take themes to heart, and I always love a good "enigma wrapped in a riddle."
NOTES: -Maybe a point off for being inconsistent in goal. Though as admirable in a movie as any other characteristic, I found this to be the most restricting on ability to follow along. -Also notable is the fact that it's very release sparked opening of sealed governmental records on the subject.
OVERALL: A+