Ring of Treason (1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The "infamous five" (Portland Spy Ring case)
VanheesBenoit10 November 2009
"Ring of spies" is a sober but faithful reconstruction in documentary style of the events surrounding the British "Portland Spy Ring". On January 7th 1961, 5 people were arrested in London in connection with espionage activities in the Admiralty Underwater Weapons Establishment in Portland. It was the first major success against a spy network in the UK. It also remains a case which is still today shrouded in a lot of mystery.

Spider in the Portland web was Konon T. Molody, who took the alias of "Gordon Lonsdale". As a facade, this Russian spy posed as a Canadian businessman, renting jukeboxes, bubblegum and gambling machines. This cover allowed him to travel extensively without raising suspicion. Being full of pep, having good looks, lots of cash and a shiny Studebaker, he had lots of beautiful girlfriends attending his cocktail parties. However, behind his "olé olé" facade, he was a skillful KGB-agent, well trained to handle special photographic equipment and to run a spy ring. He was assisted by alias "Peter and Helen Kroger". The Krogers were living in a cozy bungalow at 45 Cranley Drive in the leafy suburb of Ruislip in West-London, posing as sellers of antique books. In reality they were Morris and Lona Cohen, two veteran communist agents, who had previously been involved in the Rosenberg spy case. They managed to slip through the holes of the FBI dragnet, and established themselves under a new -false- identity in the UK. It is interesting to point out that the Ruislip bungalow was situated nearby a US Air Force base. The "Krogers" were responsible to send the material Lonsdale brought to them to Moscow. That material came from two civilians working at Portland, Harry Houghton and Ethel Gee.

Houghton was a staff member of the naval attaché of the British Embassy in Poland in 1951. Already at that time, attracted by easy cash, he was involved in illegal activities, including in black market operations. Starting innocently with coffee, he turned to lucrative medical drugs, a bit like Harry Lime in the "Third Man". He needed the money for entertaining a girlfriend and for his heavy drinking. This vulnerability made him an interesting target for the Polish secret police UB. However, their new asset spoiled it all, by causing outrage during a party at the Embassy in 1952.

This is the starting point of "Ring of spies". After this incident, Houghton is send back to the UK. Although his drinking habits made him a security risk, he gets cleared for a job in the secret Portland facility, specialized in submarine warfare. Pure mismanagement ? Made possible thanks to the intervention of a sufficiently high ranking British civil servant with ties to the Soviets ? Things become even stranger, when somewhere in 1955 or '56, Houghton's wife introduced a complaint against her husband. She told the authorities that her husband brought secret documents to his home. After a rather sloppy investigation (?), the accusation was brushed aside as being unfounded, merely the result of the frustrations of a woman badly treated by her husband. In 1956 she divorced him, and Harry's money problems started again. This led him to move to a small caravan. Probably in the same year, agents from the Eastern Bloc contacted him again, and offered him cash in exchange for secret papers. With the help of his colleague Ethel Gee, he's soon able to move to a nice house and to buy a car, making exactly the same mistakes as Aldrich Ames (see "Traitor within") many years later.

Peter Wright describes in his controversial book "Spy Catcher" how the revelations of a Polish source dubbed "Sniper" helped the British and Americans to identify Houghton, than to pick up the trail that led to Lonsdale and the Krogers. The British had to be particularly careful not to scare off professionals such as Lonsdale or the Krogers. Therefor, it is interesting to combine watching "Ring of spies" with the 1987 movie "A pack of lies". To quote Writerasfilmcritic, who wrote an excellent comment for IMDb about it : "Pack of Lies" is a very interesting drama (about) MI5 agents, led by Alan Bates as "Stuart", (who) skillfully manipulates a well-intentioned British family into believing that they are merely police on a routine investigation who need to use their home (...) "just for the weekend", in order to surveil a suspect who has been tracked into their neighborhood. (End quotation)

POL depicts how MI5 sets up a surveillance in the Ruislip home of Bill and Ruth Search, who happened to live just across the Krogers. The presence of the MI5 agents is soon causing tremendous stress for the Searches,especially for the shy Ruth, who only has one real friend… Helen Kroger! (In POL she looks more flamboyant as the real one)

The defection of "Sniper" to the West, accelerated the arrests of the Portland Spy Ring. Interestingly, Peter Wright is convinced that Moscow knew that Lonsdale had been identified by MI5, but willingly sacrificed him to protect a super-mole within the British intelligence community. Someone within MI5 or 6 who told Moscow all about the progress in the counter-espionage effort against the Portland Spy Ring.

Both Lonsdale and the Krogers received long term prison sentences, but were released a few years later, in exchanged for a British spy. And even this sordid affair had a little bit of fairy tale-quality, as Houghton and Gee married, once they got released from prison.
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Spies of Ruislip
wilsonstuart-3234631 December 2018
No need to repeat the background to the actual case that inspired this excellent spy thriller. Compared to the ludicrous heroics and wild SFX of Bond, Bourne or Mission Impossible, Ring Of Spies seems like a different planet. But this was an era when the West faced a different sort of opponent (even if the the three threat was exaggerated to one degree or another). Security breaches had occurred before Portland, and would feature again afterwards, but never had the shadow of the enemy spy felt so close to suburbia and the Home Counties. Although long forgotten now, perhaps only Profumo overtook Portland in terms of (the then) public conscious.

The cast are uniformly good, a real effort is made to dig out (but not condone) Bernard Lee's cash strapped wheeler dealer clerk, and his infatuated spinster girlfriend. William Slyvester excels as the smooth talking professional operating under a Soviet 'legend'. The action takes place in rustic pubs, cafes, drab offices and snack bars - there's no glamour or gadgets in this slow burner, Cold War thriller.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A portrait of betrayal
robert-temple-117 October 2015
This film has recently been released on DVD under its original title of RING OF SPIES. It is an excellent film, and a fascinating dramatization of the notorious 1950s Gordon Lonsdale spy case, better known as the 'Portland Spy Ring' in Britain. The film is made with a documentary attitude, and a great deal of verisimilitude is added to the film through the use of a wide variety of genuine locations (i.e., Ruislip Station because the Krogers really lived there). Many of the location scenes are genuinely fascinating on their own account. For instance, this film may contain the only surviving extended footage of the roof terrace at Derry and Tom's Department Store in London at that time. No expense was spared to give this film all the location shooting it needed, and the producer Sidney Gilliat was clearly not shouting at the director to get back into the studio and save some money. The director was Robert Tronson, a talented director who has always been under-estimated because most of his work was for television. He directed some of the most popular series on British television, such as THE DARLING BUDS OF MAY (1991-3), BERGERAC (1983-8), and ALL CREATURES GREAT AND SMALL (1978-88). The casting of this film was impeccable. William Sylvester is a smooth and affable charmer as the Russian spy Konon T. Molody, who masqueraded as a Canadian and an American under the pseudonym of Gordon Lonsdale. But Sylvester is a master at dropping that mask of affability as soon as his guests leave, and reverting to a grim and determined expression with ruthless immediacy. The finest performance in the film is by Bernard Lee as the alcoholic Henry Houghton who steals files from the safe at the Portland Naval Establishment so that the Soviets can learn all the British secrets about advanced submarine warfare. Two other reviewers have already provided background on the real spy case, so I shall not repeat it myself. The film wisely suggests that the drunken Houghton would never have been tolerated at Portland if he had not been protected by someone higher, which is doubtless true, considering how riddled with spies for foreign powers the Foreign Office has always been. This film is very well worth watching, both for entertainment and for historical purposes, and the location shots really are worthwhile.
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Golden Age of Treachery well realised.
ianlouisiana23 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Those were the days,I suppose,when we still had some secrets worth stealing.Before we found out that most of the Soviet submarine fleet was unserviceable due to lack of spares,the Red Army would have had to roar into Berlin on bicycles because their tanks were rusting away and their airforce would fallout of the sky because of their non-existent maintenance programme.Of course it wouldn't have done for us to have known that because we might have wondered why the Defence Budget had to be increased exponentially every year,and heaven knows where that might have led to...more money on education and health possibly,and that would never do. What a litany of magic names "Ring of spies" brings to mind.Vassal the Admiralty clerk blackmailed because of his homosexuality,Col.Ivanov the Russian spy who shared a mistress with an English Cabinet Minister,Anthony Blunt,Keeper of the Queen's pictures,those nice Krogers,Gordon Lonsdale, Harry Houghton and Bunty Gee.....traitors obsessed with sex or money or both.How many deaths were caused by their treachery? Houghton and Gee are the focal points of this film.She apparently a lonely and repressed spinster,he a bitter failure with a grudge against his employers.It's good to see Mr Bernard Lee stretch himself out of his usual "nice kind bloke" comfort zone and play a rather repellent character who draws the unfortunate Miss Gee into a honey trap. Miss Margaret Tyzack makes Miss Gee sympathetic if dim.Mr William Sylvester,a great favourite in the British "B" movie pantheon is equally good as Gordon Lonsdale.The mouse-like Krogers ran the spy ring from their bungalow in Ruislip.But for their duplicity and ruthlessness they could almost belong in an Ealing comedy. Mr Robert Tronson was borrowed from TV to direct and did a very fine job,there is hardly an extraneous scene and the film is very sharply put together.This was the time when some British second features were made with more care and attention than the "big" movies they preceded.They provided gainful employment for actors and technicians who would otherwise be resting between American gigs.Regular moviegoers of the time developed a real affection for the actors who regularly turned up in them,a sussurus of suppressed delight going through the audience at the appearance of a particular favourite.Many of us mourned their demise."Ring of Spies" is a fine example of a sadly-missed genre.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mature and reflective spy thriller
Leofwine_draca24 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
RING OF SPIES is a mature and reflective spy thriller which reminded me a lot of THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD. The story is literate and, although slow-paced, often compelling thanks to good depth of characterisation and the like. The fact that it's based on truth makes it all the more watchable, too. Bernard Lee does very well as the spy with conflicted loyalties, given the chance to do much more than he ever could with his underwritten 'M' role. The supporting cast is as good as you'd imagine and packed with familiar faces of various prominence. The story twists and turns throughout, remaining realistic but successfully keeping the viewer on his toes at all times.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent spy film with great london locations
malcolmgsw30 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Fascinating film not just because of the story.The film shows London as it was in the early sixties.There is even a brief glimpse of the Crazy Gang performing at the Victoria Palace.The funny thing is that the small fry,Houghton and Gee served out their time in prison,whilst the big fry ended up being exchanged for all edged British spies.Mind you Lonsdale was unhappy in Moscow and died in mysterious circumstances.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ring of Spies
henry8-318 March 2020
Solid British stuff looking in great detail at the motives and characters that make up a spy ring. The detail is wholly believable and the film has a strong cast of British character actors, particularly here - Bernard Lee.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Really interesting slice of life film!
rxelex23 May 2022
This film is well worth watching as it illustrates perfectly how the poorly paid British in secret organisations were and probably still are susceptible to turning spies for a few hundred pounds.

The two spies had combined wages of about £30 which was not much above poverty level.

Street and car scenes are very nicely done and show how basic UK cars were and how everything was still dirty and sooty from all the steam trains and inefficient engines.

Old Bernard Lee is poorly cast as a romantic lead.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Light on thrills but it has interesting machinations
shakercoola14 March 2020
A British spy thriller; A story about a British navy clerk assigned to a top secret research facility. He is blackmailed into stealing vital secrets for the Russians in exchange for cash. Set during the height of the Cold War, it is based on the true events of the Portland Spy Ring, where daily duels play out between Soviet Intelligence and British counter-espionage. Tension is undermined by the docudrama style but the playout of the espionage activities is absorbing. While Bernard Lee gives a reasonable performance, he is not a sympathetic character as the lead so it ends up a simple drawn out morality tale. His cohort, played Margaret Tyzack, while initially innocent, is drawn to venal motivation without much of a struggle, so the drama is rather pedestrian at times.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ring of Spies
Prismark1017 July 2023
Based on the true story of the Portland Spy Ring. Bernard Lee takes time off as M to play hard drinking loose cannon Harry Houghton. Sacked as an embassy attaché in Warsaw. He bids a drunken farewell to his girlfriend who works for the Russians.

Harry is posted at a secret a Royal Navy equipment testing facility at Portland. He is soon approached by secret Soviet intelligence to hand over documents to them with the veiled threat of blackmail. After all he used to drunkenly tell secrets to his girlfriend back in Warsaw.

Harry realises that to take the documents from the safe. He needs to seduce work colleague Elizabeth Gee as she has the keys. She nervously and reluctantly agrees.

Once they get used to the money paid by his handler Gordon Lonsdale (William Sylvester.) They enjoy the good life, not realising that they have attracted the attention of the authorities suspicious of traitors in their midst.

Lee plays Harry as a bluff chancer. A cynical drunk and not too bright. Margaret Tyzack makes more of an impression as Gee, seduced by the good life and greed.

The movie has a documentary setting but plays it too safe and straight.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Most enjoyable.
plan9929 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Probably a more realistic portrayal of what goes on in the world of spies than James Bond but not as exciting as a result of course.

Done documentary style with a warning at the end for those watching it in a cinema which was a nice touch.

How many spies/crooks I wonder have been caught due to spending beyond their income, quite a lot probably as it must be very difficult to resist splashing the cash around a bit. Buying a brand new Zephyr was a bit of a giveaway.

Well worth watching and a few actors, who would become very well known later, are uncredited in this film so watch out for them.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Minimalist
dierregi28 February 2022
Based on true facts, the plot narrates without many embellishments, frills and thrills the downfall of Henry Houghton an alcoholic Navy Clerk.

After having been sent back to England in disgrace, from his post at the British Embassy in Warsaw, Houghton decides to take revenge and sell military secrets to Lonsdale, a man he believes to be an American agent.

Lonsdale is actually a Russian spy, connected with a couple of minor key players also located in London. The last member of the ring is Elizabeth Gee, a spinster secretary convinced by Houghton to collaborate with him in exchange for substantial payments that afford some luxuries to the couple.

It is exactly the more affluent lifestyle to raise suspicions and get the Houghton/Gee couple under surveillance. Way more believable than any James Bond story.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid, but implausible
adverts7 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A solid spy film. Not nearly as good as A Spy Who Came in from the Cold...but still interesting.

Spoiler: I had really a problem with idea that Bernard Lee's house would be bugged(!) just because he spent a few extra quid on drinks! He'd been working for 25+ years, so he certainly could have had some savings. It's not as if they had anything else on him. The writers should have come up with something else to move the plot along.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Don't let the ******** get too far ahead of you, Doris."
brogmiller1 November 2023
Cinéphiles could be forgiven for never having heard of Robert Tronson as he is mainly known for his work on the small screen but with a limited budget and without the customarily dramatic score, he has done a pretty good job here and uses the understated, docudrama treatment to great effect. There is nothing in the least glamorous about the activities of the infamous five members of the Portland spy ring and you certainly won't catch any of the cast 'acting'.

It is said to be based on factual events but this is true only up to a point. Harry Houghton was far from being the amiable boozer played so superbly by Bernard Lee but was in fact a seedy, scurrilous individual who would peddle anything for money and who beat up his wife. Her character is completely absent from the film which is an oversight as she it was who wrote three letters to the Admiralty alerting them that her husband was divulging secret information for cash. Through a combination of misogyny and sheer incompetence her letters were dismissed by MI5 as the ravings of a jealous and disgruntled wife. Likewise, suspicions of Houghton and his partner Elisabeth Gee were not aroused by their so-called extravagant lifestyle but by a tip off from a Polish spy that there was a 'mole' in the Admiralty named Horton or thereabouts. This episode has been completely omitted which further robs the film of dramatic effect. It is entirely possible that writers Launder and Barnes were hamstrung by legal constraints and one can only afford them the benefit of the doubt. The film is not without ironic Anglo-Saxon humour with two female intelligence officers dressed as nuns and Houghton, Gee and their contact Lonsdale obliged to stand for the National Anthem.

The location work is excellent even down to the house in Ruislip where the Cohens, alias the Krogers, conducted their traitorous activities. There is a convincing performance by William Sylvester as Konon Molody, alias Gordon Lonsdale whose slick persona provides a perfect cover and who succeeds in convincing the naive Gee that she is spying for the Americans! She is played by Margaret Tyzack and she is so good in this that one wonders why better film parts did not come her way.

Ironically, although Houghton and Gee received the shortest sentences of the five, they ended up serving the longest terms as the other three were all released as part of an exchange deal with the Soviets. All three achieved the dubious distinction of appearing on Soviet postage stamps. By all accounts Molody was unhappy in Russia and died in mysterious circumstances so in his case the punishment fitted the crime.

Where the film is spot on is in depicting the lamentable lack of security at the Underwater Weapons Establishment and the deep affection between Houghton and Gee who were married on their release from prison.

As for the film, its release was delayed for 'legal reasons' and limited for fear of prosecution. One can only assume that the verbose and faintly ludicrous disclaimer at the end is a classic piece of ****covering designed to deter potential lawsuits.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid cautionary tale about UK Cold War spy case
adrianovasconcelos11 April 2024
Robert Tronson, better known as a TV film director, helmed the production of RING OF SPIES, aka RING OF TREASON, which is a kind of British noir cautionary tale based on the Gordon Lonsdale spy case in the UK in the 1950s.

Of undeniable quality for a B flick, it is professionally done, solid Arthur Lavis cinematography, competent editing by Thelma Connell, and good acting by unusual lead Bernard Lee in the even more unlikely role of womanizer, tippler, and money-driven spy; Margaret Tyzack as the upstanding, fully compliant state functionary who gets corrupted by Lee, and falls in the web of espionage crime (needless to say, both Lee and Tyzack end up looking stupid and untrustworthy, soiling their good name forever; William Sylvester does well with his short part as the nefarious Gordon Lonsdale; and Thorley Walters portrays very effectively Commander Winters as the overseer of the sting operation that netted the ring of spies.

In that context, I particularly liked the deployment of police personnel and vehicles following the suspects, the way one accountant-like copper kept taking note of how much Houghton (Lee) spent on drinking alone, and sharp arithmetic calculations uncovering the fact that he and Tyzack simply did not earn enough to maintain such a lavish lifestyle.

Definitely worth watching both as dramatization of a real incident and something to learn from: careful what you wish for, it could change you and your life... and seldom, if ever, for the better. 7/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
great film though not strictly factual
simondeeley1218 February 2023
I've always loved this film - not least because most of the filming locations are familiar to me.

I'm not usually a fan of spy films, but this one works for me partly because the casting is so excellent.

There is a great chemistry between Bernard Lee and Margaret Tyzack, and if you watch some of their reactions closely they appear spontaneous rather than rehearsed.

The only reservation I have about the film is, while it's great entertainment, its only very loosely based on the facts.

And that is why I wrote this article - not just to praise this film but rather to set the record straight for other reviewers who seem to labor under the illusion that this film is factual.

Viewers (and reviewers) should not take it as the Gospel truth in terms of historical accuracy - it's far from it. But the scriptwriter has turned the basic story into enjoyable cinema!

And with all due respect to those who have sadly departed this world, Harry Houghton and Elizabeth Gee became spies of their own volition rather than through blackmail and coercion as this film would have us believe. In fact, it portrays them more sympathetically than perhaps they really deserve.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed