8½ (1963) 8.1
A harried movie director retreats into his memories and fantasies. Director:Federico Fellini |
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
8½ (1963) 8.1
A harried movie director retreats into his memories and fantasies. Director:Federico Fellini |
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Marcello Mastroianni | ... | ||
| Claudia Cardinale | ... | ||
| Anouk Aimée | ... |
Luisa Anselmi
(as Anouk Aimee)
|
|
| Sandra Milo | ... | ||
|
|
Rossella Falk | ... | |
| Barbara Steele | ... | ||
|
|
Madeleine Lebeau | ... |
Madeleine, l'attrice francese
|
|
|
Caterina Boratto | ... | |
|
|
Eddra Gale | ... |
La Saraghina
(as Edra Gale)
|
|
|
Guido Alberti | ... | |
|
|
Mario Conocchia | ... |
Conocchia, il direttore di produzione
|
|
|
Bruno Agostini | ... |
Bruno - il secondo segretario di produzione
|
|
|
Cesarino Miceli Picardi | ... |
Cesarino, l'ispettore di produzione
|
|
|
Jean Rougeul | ... |
Carini, il critico cinematografico
|
|
|
Mario Pisu | ... | |
Guido is a film director, trying to relax after his last big hit. He can't get a moment's peace, however, with the people who have worked with him in the past constantly looking for more work. He wrestles with his conscience, but is unable to come up with a new idea. While thinking, he starts to recall major happenings in his life, and all the women he has loved and left. An autobiographical film of Fellini, about the trials and tribulations of film making. Written by Colin Tinto <cst@imdb.com>
Intellectuals have written volumes on this strange film by Italian New Wave director, Federico Fellini. I am not an intellectual, so my review will be brief. At its most basic, "8 1/2" (a.k.a. "Otto e mezzo") concerns Guido, a film director (supposedly a surrogate for Fellini himself), who is having what amounts to a midlife crisis. Guido is frustrated in his film-making, and by his relations with other people in his life. But the film's story does not proceed in a traditional, linear fashion. Fellini more or less abandons logical narration, in favor of "open form" narration, wherein the story's causal chain of events is broken.
Thus, trying to figure out what is going on in this film can be hard. Guido's fantasies, memories, dreams, and reality co-mingle in a kind of cinematic stew. Fellini presents viewers with a kaleidoscope of surreal B&W images of ordinary objects and eccentric, chattering characters which interact with Guido and with each other, in ways that defy logic, and give breathtaking meaning to the term symbolism. Followers of psychologist Carl Jung would have a field day. In style, the film is flamboyant. In substance, the film is maddeningly subliminal. And yet, even the most metallic cynic, Pauline Kael notwithstanding, must surely appreciate the rareness of Fellini's probing introspection.
Given the bizarre, unstructured content of "8 1/2", I wonder about the issue of necessity. Suppose Fellini had added an extra ten minutes to the screenplay, or deleted ten minutes. Would that have made any difference? Apart from Guido, if this or that character had been deleted, how would that have changed the story's significance? And if, as some have suggested, the film is a mirror image of Fellini's own confused psyche, can the story be construed as an intuition of his future film-making?
"Otto e mezzo" is not for everyone. Like a Zen koan, "8 1/2" invites frustration. It is above all else a celebration of ambiguity and abstraction, a cinematic experience to ponder, especially on the heels of four or five martinis ... or 8 1/2, if you really want to induce immense intellectual insight. Cheers.