Battle of the Worlds (1961) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Fascinating, But A Bit Too Oblique For It's Own Good
Steve_Nyland6 March 2007
Antonio Margheriti's Italian Spaghetti Space Operas are some of the most interesting science fiction from the 1960s. Starting with SPACE MEN (or ASSIGNMENT: OUTER SPACE) and culminating with the brilliantly mod GAMMA ONE QUADROLIGY, Margheriti helped to shape the ultimate form of the genre -- Kubrick's 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY -- and gave it a truly modern ring (for the time) that was only bettered by the Soviet era science fiction like PLANETA BUR and MECHA NEVSTRACHU. A journeyman filmmaker with a background in production design, Margheriti was not as visionary in his approach as contemporary Mario Bava, who's PLANET OF THE VAMPIRES remains the most impressive example of Spaghetti Science Fiction, but Margheriti had perhaps a more populist approach to his work that still endears forty-plus years later. His use of models, miniatures and pyrotechnics alone would have earned him a very respectable place in the annals of the genre by themselves.

BATTLE OF THE WORLDS is his second trip into the galaxy for entertainment, and compared to the previous year's ASSIGNMENT: OUTER SPACE, this movie is almost a quantum leap forward in terms of ambitions for his plot, characters and action sequences. And I suspect that as is the case with ASSIGNMENT: OUTER SPACE a great deal of the critical responses this movie has accumulated ("Atsa one-a lousy meataball") has to do with the really crummy surviving prints of the film, or rather the surviving home video transfers available on public domain oriented DVD collections. BATTLE OF THE WORLDS was certainly a much more impressive experience when shown in it's correct original widescreen ratio, probably 2:35:1 Techniscope by the looks of the pan and scanning going on to condense the film for small screen. The color on the transfers -- which are likely traceable to the same early 1980s transfer to VHS -- are almost uniformly rotted nearly to sepia in spots, with plenty of surface noise & jumbled damage to individual frames. What most people are reviewing is the DVD they saw, not the film itself.

I must admit that the first time I saw this movie I despised it, didn't understand it, and shelved the poor video for a few years until I sold it before realizing who director Anthony Dawson was. Now seeing it again a few years older and wiser I still must come clean and say I don't understand the plot, how the story gets from A to B to C, and have actually been paying attention just to figure it all out. From what I can gather, Earth finds itself under assault from a wandering "planet" that has come from another galaxy (a story idea Margheriti would later re-visit in his Gamma One project), ostensibly to conquer Earth as a new home for it's passengers. Only crazed astronomer/mathematician Claude Raines understands the phenomenon as what it really is: An attack, and urges the united Earth government bodies to act before it is too late.

In pursuit of that end there are lots of frantic rocket ship battles, near collisions, big Margheriti explosions and of course a location shoot at a local power plant or electrical substation standing in for a spaceport. There is a base on Mars, guys in pressure suits doing stuff on the surface of the invading planet, a cute little puppy dog and even some romance. Including, oddly, old man Raines almost openly having a thing for his 20 year old assistant with her dark, fluttering eyelashes. Raines is easily the most impressive aspect of the film but mostly because he emotes such vigor in his role, and seems to be enjoying it so much, that you can't help but be charmed by the effort. Even if it's hard to understand what he's on about half the time. But like a Spaghetti Western what makes it "work" is the collection of individual moments that make up the film, some of which are actually very well done.

5/10: Look fast for Spaghetti Western hero Giuliano Gemma in one of his first screen roles, and yes: We NEED a better print, badly.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Earth is threatened yet again
chris_gaskin1237 November 2005
I've just seen Battle of the Worlds for the first time and is very similar to When Worlds Collide, which was made ten years before this in 1951.

A planet is discovered to be on a collision course with Earth and a way is devised to try and stop it. To makes things worse, Earth is attacked by flying saucers from this planet but they are eventually defeated. A party, including Professor Benson then lands on this planet and they manage to blow it up and successfully do so, but with Benson still on there as he refused orders to evacuate. Earth is saved yet again.

Battle Of the Worlds tends to be a little talky and slow moving in parts but the flying saucer scenes are OK. Despite it being talky, it is fairly eerie in parts.

This features a good performance from Claude Rains (The Invisible Man, The Wolf Man, The Lost World) as Professor Benson but he is the only star I've heard of in the cast.

To sum up, an average movie but not brilliant.

Rating: 2 and a half stars out of 5.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Okay Italian Science Fiction
dbborroughs14 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
For me this film is an old friend. Its a film I've seen countless times thanks to showing on the Late Late Show while I was growing up.Its been forever in the bargain bins. The film is about a giant asteroid that comes close to earth and our attempts to find out why its sending out ships to attack us. As a film its an okay time killer its not bad. Its not great but its definitely not bad. Its certainly better than many of the space opera films that followed in its wake through the 60's and early 70's. One of the reasons I think the film works, and is the reason I will watch the film again and again is the presence of Claude Rains as the mad genius who wants to know whats going on so he can save the world. Its a force of nature performance that allows him to really tear the roof off and go for it. Certainly it more than a little over done but some how seeing the great man being out of character is a great deal of fun. I really like the film and recommend it to those with a love of science fiction
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
momma mia, atsa somma crummy meataball!
march9hare9 April 2004
Claude Rains stars as Prof. Benson, a cynical mathematical genius/recluse who must save the world from implacable aliens. The movie has an interesting premise - a planetoid enters into orbit around the Earth causing widespread upheavals of Nature, and turns out to be a sort of alien Noah's Ark - but is marred by a tiny budget, hambone acting (except for Rains), oafish direction, and really crummy effects even for 1961. This may not have been Rains' last film, but he certainly deserved better. Having said all that, for some odd reason this one remains a favorite. Guess there's no accounting for taste. Seriously though, there are worse. MUCH worse.
29 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Now I know why they call it "cheesy sci-fi"...
valkensyc30 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Wow. Really, wow. This movie has tons of potential, and goes absolutely nowhere! The special effects are top notch considering the time in which it was made. The technology smacks of the odd "computer" style of the sixties where lighted buttons with no labels dominated the sci-fi realm. Very "Star Trek"-esquire.

That aside, the only saving grace of this film is Claude. His charatcer actually has life to it. It is a bit much, but considering his co-stars, it is no wonder why.

The whole film is perfect to be ripped on. Get your sci-fi buddies, grab a bag of chips and some cheese dip, and wail away at this one. Tom Servo and Crow would be your best co-pilots on this journey into the horribly lame.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I Never Quite Got the Politics
Hitchcoc4 May 2006
What a low point for the man from "Casablanca" and "The Invisible Man." He plays a testy old guy who seems to strike fear into all those around him. He is an astronomer who is aware that some odd thing is going on, having to do with a planet/asteroid that is approaching the Earth. Apparently, it is a screening device for flying saucers, set to attack and destroy the earth. It's another one of those movies where everyone understands the science, but the viewer has not a clue what they are talking about. Rains keeps talking about the Bigwigs in the government. Apparently, there is some kind of federation that sets up roadblocks and whom he must answer to. He wants total control of the efforts to get rid of the invaders. He banters and intimidates. He almost has a glow on him when he appears in different places. There are lots of explosions and few explanations. Rains becomes possessed and will listen to no one. It's just not very good.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Battle to stay awake
ctomvelu14 September 2012
Forgettable early 1960s Italian-made space opera -- except for one thing. That one thing is 70-year-old Claude Rains playing a mad scientist. An asteroid that looks remarkably like a real planet and not all like a hunk of rock begins orbiting the Earth and sends out flying saucers that attack our space fleet. Before the military destroys it, a team of astronauts, including Rains, is sent to the asteroid to have a look at what's inside. Mostly, they find miles of suspended plastic tubing. Very talky, but anytime Rains is on-screen, the movie comes to life. His character is as daffy as the mad scientist he played in "The Invisible Man." Special effects are pathetic and the dubbing is typical for an Italian cheapie of the period.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"It's not difficult to tell the truth, but it's impossible to be believed."
classicsoncall10 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I guess every great actor is allowed at least one poor casting decision, and with this film, that distinction goes to Claude Rains. It's hard to believe the Professor Benson of this film is the same man who brilliantly portrayed Captain Renault in 1942's "Casablanca". Here he's one dimensionally annoying as a bull headed scientist who's undeniably impressed with himself and isn't shy about letting you know it - "There's only one opinion that interests me, and that's my own."

Benson's mathematical calculations convince him that a body in outer space will come within ninety five thousand miles of Earth, even though colleagues and military strategists fret over it's seeming collision course with our planet. What Benson didn't count on, and by his own admission the only time he was ever wrong, is that once the asteroid reaches it's predestined location, it starts orbiting the Earth. With obvious implications that a guiding force is at the core of the mysterious body, Benson demands that Earth's 'High Command' not destroy it, but allow him and a team of his fellow scientists investigate.

I always get a kick out of the way sci-fi flicks of the era took such liberty with the vast amounts of time involved in space travel, and reduced them to mere minutes for purposes of the story. In about the time it took to count down from ten to one, blast off, Benson's team was on the asteroid, investigating a cable laden labyrinth with an ominous red glow. With a destruct sequence in effect, Benson prefers to confront the truth of the mystery of the 'Outsider', while everyone else with him wisely decides that maybe it's time to go. On that note, one of the team members sadly concludes that Benson had a formula where his heart should have been, as the planet goes kablooey.

"Battle of the Worlds" is a gross exaggeration in selection of a title. Nothing on that vast a scale occurs, though there are occasional skirmishes between Earth rockets and alien flying saucers. If there's a positive to be found here, at least the sci-fi elements of the picture were a notch above other films of the era, as film making technology relentlessly moved toward breakthroughs that would appear in "Star Trek" in a few more years.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Claude Rains is fun to watch
davedb4 May 2012
I found this movie in one of those Mill Creek 50-packs. It's a low-budget sci-fi film that works better with ideas than special effects. As a MST3K fan I found myself riffing some scenes out of habit. But as flawed as it is, trashing it outright misses the better points.

I don't know what movie Claude Rains thought he was in, because he truly brings his A-game as a curmudgeon. He's the professor (often in a hammock) who the futuristic government doesn't believe. Stuck in his belief of scientific fact, he is not taken seriously.

Does Rains chew the scenery? Yep, but it's fun and funny. I felt he probably enjoyed this character. He gives Prof. Benson mannerisms and tics that a lesser actor would not have bothered with. So he is 2 of my 5 points, because is so fun to watch.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid Early '60s Italian Hard Sci-Fi
mstomaso3 August 2010
The appearance of Claude Rains is not the only surprise in Anthony Dawson's Il pianeta degli uomini spenti (A.K.A. Battle of the Worlds). Rains plays an eccentric, reclusive, contemptuous elderly scientist who leads a powerful research team. Professor Benson is the best, and he has little patience for lesser minds. His only link to humanity seems to be Eve (Maya Brent), his assistant. Her coming of age, the insubordination of one of the younger members of his research team, and the impending arrival of an enormous and mysterious space object - The Outsider - combine to challenge "the old man's" carefully-constructed self concept, his arrogance, and, ultimately, the continuation of life on earth.

Ultimately, this is one of Italy's best and most serious sci-fi films, and one of the better early '60s sci-fi films to come out of Europe. The relatively primitive (but creative) effects coupled with the very serious and dramatic tone of the dialog may be difficult for most American viewers. Giorgio Giovannini's soundtrack is jarring and intense. And the excellent, but sometimes surreal, Marcello Masciocchi cinematography won't help the average viewer enjoy this film. The international cast (mostly Americans) does very well.

Given the film's dubious pedigree and silly cliché title, I can certainly understand why some reviewers felt compelled to use the words "cheesy" and "spaghetti" in their reviews. I am tempted to point out that macaroni and cheese is a very tasty dish, but I will refrain. Approach this film with an open mind and you might just be able to get something more than guilty pleasure from it.
28 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The goofy threat, an Italian treat
Cristi_Ciopron2 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
One of those '60s tiny budget, really bad Sci Fi movies, where the 'actors' perform unlikely scenes as if they are under sedatives or worse, while an ethereal, disturbing score floods everything, the atmosphere is unwillingly eerie; like other Italian flicks of the very same trend, it has a crazy enough, if silly, storyline, a certain freedom and inventiveness, perhaps a good sense of the show—it has scenes on Mars, a vile, perhaps even depraved seductress, an unapproachable but ultimately kind genius, etc.. Now compare that to a classic Bert Gordon—not to mention the even sillier Buchanan—and you'll see for yourself what I mean—the Italian Sci Fi looks a bit more lively, less morose; though, of course, still goofy rubbish.

BATTLE OF THE WORLDS is goofy Sci—Fi, derisory and unremarkable, aimed at kids, where silliness competes with clumsiness and witlessness—a knockout cocktail; a team of scientists faces the extragalactic threat.

An object from another galaxy approaches the Earth; its trajectory indicates a rational activity. It is guided by a rational force, and the UFOs don't take time to appear as from behind this object. And in these circumstances, the fate of the humanity lies in the hands of a group of scientists headed by the grumpy oldster I have already mentioned. After a while, the flick becomes all about this zany old—timer and his antics.

I admit not having recognized the presumptive Gemma in this flick; have you? Some '60s goofy Sci—Fi movies, derisory and lame, had nonetheless a bit of charm, a kind of fun, an appeal; you can call them flicks, perhaps they are no more than footage, goofy Sci—Fi footage. Each connoisseur has his own selection in this genre, as each knows his dish. Anyway, for fans of a certain kind of goofy Sci Fi, BATTLE OF THE WORLDS, mediocre rubbish from the '60s, provides some fun.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Watching Italian Sci-Fi is like taking a candy striped drug trip
thebigcube11 October 2001
I'm very tired of Italian Science Fiction getting a bad rap for being dull films. Just sit back and let your self be hypnotized by the world that a film like BATTLE OF THE WORLDS creates and I guarantee you will find your self on a trip to the end of the universe. The sound effects and use of color alone will have you wishing this film will never end...and it almost seems it doesn't
36 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some of my favorite cheese...
scifiguy-231 August 2002
I happened to see this many times in the 1960's, at kiddie matinees in the theater. Imagine 50 cents for a triple feature every weekend, for years on end. There were a lot of dog films, but this one stood out with decent f/x and unique sound effects. It's one of the earliest space-operas depicting dog fighting ships in space, preceded only by the 1959 Toho production of "Battle In Outer Space". Say what you want about the bad voice dubbing and the unknown Italian cast. Films like this were not being produced in the U.S. during this period, due to lack of effects technology, and budget constraints. At the time, it was a bold attempt in a genre that was just beginning. Jaded modern viewers should see this in context within the history of fantasy films. Pure science fiction was rare during this period, and a treat for fans at the time. Claude Rains has some very good dialouge, as a cynical mathmatician guiding efforts to thwart alien invaders. The ships are well conceived, with the footage re-used in later films. Unfortunately, the editing is choppy and the video transfers that exist are very poor. It would be nice to see a widescreen restoration.
40 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The towering presence of Claude Rains
kevinolzak8 November 2021
1960's "Battle of the Worlds" (Il Planeta Degli Uomini or The Planet of Extinct Men) marks only the second science fiction entry from Italian director Antonio Margheriti (under his usual pseudonym Anthony Dawson), perhaps his best given that "Assignment: Outer Space" did not fare well internationally, plus the towering screen presence of an aging Claude Rains in the central role of Professor Benson, very similar to his just completed Professor Challenger in Irwin Allen's "The Lost World." A rogue planet dubbed 'The Outsider' has entered our galaxy and is believed to be on a collision course to destroy the earth, the scientific community casually brushing off Benson's assertion that it will merely pass by without incident. The old man soon learns that 'The Outsider' has slipped into orbit around our planet. Causing a wave of destruction and suicides to force an exploratory ship to examine it more closely. A small force of saucers are dispatched to obliterate the ship, so Benson himself is finally allowed to take charge in the battle, reasoning that 'The Outsider' is something of a 'Noah's Ark,' a relic from a dead world that can be reprogrammed to go back where it came from. The climax offers a race against time, Benson's crew desperate to return to their vessel and take off before nuclear warheads target 'The Outsider' in a blaze of glory. Top screenwriting workhorse Ennio de Concini was coming off Mario Bava's "Black Sunday," and continued working in all genres throughout a prolific career, the 70 year old Rains giving this one a stronger edge with an over the top performance that commands the screen, cantankerous yet lovable, an outsider himself who would prefer to die knowing the truth than live without knowledge. Rarely seen outside the confines of his greenhouse, scribbling calculations on flower pots, Rains easily dominates a cast of barely outlined characters, one couple ready to wed who suddenly end their relationship, another happily married and working in tandem from Earth to Mars. Margheriti's 1965 "Planet on the Prowl" would feature the same type of underground world for its finale, what appears to be a living, breathing organism with brain cells and arteries that bleed crimson. Rather than waste the talents of a fine actor, this low budget vehicle actually gives him something tangible to sink his teeth into, delivering in spades for a film that never receives much love, mostly relegated to horrid, washed out prints.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enjoyable effects-filled no-brainer
El-Stumpo1 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
From Italian genre expert Antonio Margheriti, or "Anthony M. Dawson" as he was known to the English speaking world, best known for films about cannibals and killer fish. In 1960 he started an entire genre of spaghetti sci-fi films with Assignment: Outer Space. It was a typically Italian exercise in creating something out of nothing, and not surprisingly at a time when any film with Hercules in the title meant instant box-office, it was sold around the world. For his second space opera Margheriti was handed a bigger budget - which means he was given slightly more than nothing - to create an ambitious, not to mention enjoyable, effects-filled no-brainer: the 1961 Battle Of The Worlds.

More moolah meant star billing for an imported American actor. So, almost 30 years after playing The Invisible Man, aging raconteur Claude Raines plays Professor Benson, a cranky, wordy, gas-filled yet sympathetic egghead in Mr Magoo glasses who detects a planetoid dubbed "The Outsider" heading for the pseudo-utopian community on Earth. Against Benson's advice the Army sends its spacecraft to knock it out but they're destroyed by a fleet of spinning flying saucers who emerge from inside the planet with jagged laser beams a-blazing. The fools! Benson then discovers the planetoid locked into an ever-decreasing orbit around the Earth, suggesting a super-computer from a dying alien civilization inside the planet; his missionary zeal for pure knowledge leads him to offer himself in the ultimate act of sacrifice, descending deep into the bowels of the runaway planet.

And they really do look like bowels - glowing red and filled with plastic tubing, a triumph of low-budget ingenuity from the Godfather of Spaghetti sci-fi thanks to his resourcefulness as a special effects wizard, working miracles out of a few toilet rolls and a vacuum hose. Amidst the relentlessly talky script and the pointless romantic interludes, there's a strange, almost quasi-revolutionary thread against the military industrial complex, but that's the crazy Italians for you. So, from the man who would one day direct Cannibal Apocalypse comes an early one in the insanely huge Antonio Margheriti catalog: the 1961 Battle Of The Worlds.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wildly overrated.
planktonrules26 September 2009
On IMDb, a score of 4.0 is pretty poor, but STILL I think this is wild overrating this film. IL PIANETA DEGLI UOMINI SPENTI ("Battle of the Worlds") is a truly terrible sci-fi film with nothing to recommend it. A small part of the rottenness of this movie isn't the fault of the film makers. The DVD I just watched had one of the worst prints I have ever seen. The color was almost 100% drained out of the film. While there were some patches of the film that had very dull and muted color, other parts looked like the film was originally shot in black & white--it was that faded. However, the ravages of time cannot explain away most of the awfulness that was this film!

For some inexplicable reason (it had to be money or they were holding a family member hostage), the well-respected British/American actor Claude Rains was featured in this film. This is pretty sad, as his part in the film was rather annoying and one-dimensional. He played a brilliant professor who seemed to have super-human knowledge and could use calculus to pretty much explain EVERYTHING. In addition, he had the social skills of a hyena and spent most of the film yelling at everyone and acting very, very superior. He didn't play a person, really, but more of a caricature.

The plot involves some planet that just shows up in the solar system. Amazingly, no one seemed to spot it until it practically was ready to seemingly collide with the Earth. Now here's the stupid part. When the governments on Earth realize the collision is coming, they don't want to tell anyone because it will cause panic! What part of "giant planet colliding with the Earth" don't they understand?! If this IS inevitable, let the people panic--they're all going to die anyway in a few days!

In the meantime, we are treated by lots of ground-breaking special effects such as the space station on Mars as well as the high tech rocket ships. I once saw similar effects--back when I had "Major Matt Mason" toys when I was a kid. I know this dates me, but for those in the 40-50 age range, you probably know what I am talking about here. In other words, these things all looked like very, very cheap toys...at best. Heck, in some cases, you can see the strings on the rockets and the explosions and lasers were so very obviously drawn in later. The folks at studios like American-International or Ed Wood would have laughed at the amateurness of the special effects.

In addition to looking craptastic, the plot was amazingly dull and I had a hard time staying awake to see the movie to completion. The movie, in essence, consisted of toys flying about, Claude Rains overacting and embarrassing himself and a plot so amazingly uninteresting I just wanted to see everything collide and end the film...as soon as possible!

Dull, dull, dull...and stupid. This one clearly has earned the lowest rating of 1.
7 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I'll take a rain(s) check on that!
dbdumonteil3 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Claude Rains' worst part?This flick is a strong contender!Like his compatriots Bette Davis and Joan Crawford,he tries his hand at camp!Overacting is an euphemism.Wearing horrible glasses ,writing mathematical gibberish everywhere ,lazily lying on his hammock in his greenhouse,and ranting ceaselessly about the power of the army. .

A new war of the worlds is about to break out! The flying saucers are hardly superior to Ed Wood's stuff,but the "il pianeta degli uomini spenti" (Rains finds the place so fascinating he decides to stay there till he dies ,impending death anyway)shows painstaking film sets ,and there's a smart nod at Noah's Ark but the desultory script borrows a lot from the highly superior "Forbidden planet" .

Claude Rains' fans?Do they really have to choose this,among all his other films around?
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
SCIENCE IS NOBODY'S PERSONAL PLANET
nogodnomasters12 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a 1963 Italian sci-fi film. A planet from outside the galaxy has been seen in our solar system and is headed for earth. Only the obstinate Dr. Benson can save us because he know calculus. The picture takes place in the future where we have bases on Mars.

The acting was bad as the film lacked any decent dialogue. The special effects were cardboard space craft on a string. This is a color film but doesn't hesitate to use black and white stock footage of natural disasters. The film lacked the camp value to make it a good "bad film" to watch. It was interesting to see their vision of our future. There are better and "badder" old sci-fi films out there
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ham and Cheese Deluxe - Battle of the Worlds
arthur_tafero20 May 2021
This is the perfect film for MST 3000. It has everything; horrendous music and sound track effects, hammy acting, and a cheesy script delivered by horrendous Italian actors (Italians traditionally make horrendous sci-fi films; they do great Westerns, but not Sci-Fi). The plot was derived by sitting fifteen minutes in the men's room (or less) and the script was written in even less time. Claude Rains delivers his lines as if he is in a Shakespearean play. Example: "Did anyone see my glasses????!!!!!!". It is easily the worst thing he ever did on film. There are no aliens or battles; it is all in the mind. This is why the major studios passed on this turkey. I was very thankful to see one of the worst ten sci-fi films of all time. There are hundreds of cheesy sci-fi productions, but this one won the Kraft Cheese award for one of the worst of all time.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Claude Raines is ANNOYING
aaronmocksing198710 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"CORNFIELD!!... YOU'RE WONDERFUL!" Claude Raines stars in a movie in which I was forced to watch with the volume set very high (at my mother's, who bought this terrible movie, wishes). I never really understood the plot as it doesn't seem explained much at all; the only things I got was that the world was in danger and a senile old man that everyone likes (despite his hatred and constant acts of crudeness to everyone else) is sent in to help. Then they enter a tunnel, with what looks like a bunch of children's toys holding it together, where the old man laughs again before going out with the planet. As said before, I never got the plot and I chose not to watch it again. If I put it up, I deal with Claude's bombastic insults towards his annoyingly "quaint" co-workers. If I put it down, I still won't get the plot as no one will be speaking.

Thank goodness for Star Wars to come along and make a TON of more sense, as well as something likable.

I also never truly understood what the song is playing in the opening titles. It sounds like she's saying, "We are but SPIDERZCH.." followed by a direct shout of the director's name: "ANTOOOOOOOOOINE!!!!!"
1 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An interesting and atmospheric movie.
m-fan24 January 2003
The mysterious sounding music of the main title when the film starts sets the pace for the whole movie, which is laid-back yet enchanting (especially if watched at night).

It is not hardly a typical space battle type picture so this should not be expected. As a matter of fact this movie shows a much more realistic viewing of what space travel will be like when it finally becomes common place. For example the rockets are propelled by some type of gas, and permission has to be given from mission control before engines are started, and rocket courses and accelerations have to take into account things like planet gravity and possible g forces on the crew.

The main characters are interesting and even though it is overdubbed the dialog is good, with a few exceptions which are fun to laugh at. The acting by Claude Rains is very good, and you can actually feel sympathy for professor Benson, who has nothing to keep him going but science (and Eve though he finds it hard to admit it even to himself).

The story is interesting and has a few twists to it that keep things moving along. The movie also presents an interesting commentary on possible future government-military-industrial and international organization. This movie might not fit everyone's taste, yet people who sometimes enjoy laid-back atmospheric fantasies should enjoy it.
30 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad and Sad
benjgross-185-9108376 October 2021
This is definitely one of the worst-made movies out there. Acting is bad too. Watching Claude Raines stumble through this far out screenplay is sad. Worth watching.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classic Sci-Fi with some snappy philosophical dialogue
Rabh1720 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Okay-- The Earth is threatened by an Outsider-- a dark world that comes out of the Intergalactic Depths to wreck havoc on the Earth. Attempts to investigate gives rise to a fleet of flying saucer ships that destroy all who approach!! DOOM!!!

Yes-- this is 1961!

This was not a movie of the Space Age-- but more precisely a Movie from the Age of Outer Space.

And despite it being an Italian film, it is quite good, giving a strong nod to the basic lay science of Outer Space as it was known in that bygone era. So forget any descriptions such as 'Spagetti Space Opera'. They don't do justice to this film.

For me as a kid in 1968 when I first saw it on TV-- in grainy Black & White -- it was merely an exciting film about space rockets and flying saucers. The dialogue outside of the spaceship scenes was gibberish and mainly ignored. And when I WAS paying attention, my mother kept calling to me from the kitchen to turn off the 'Idiot Box' and demanding if I had finished my homework like I was supposed to.

Aaaaaagh!

But Now as an adult, I hear the dialogue between "Dr. Benson" and his subordinates and the Council as rich in almost Shakespearean content as you listen to Dr. Benson excoriate his underlings and the Powers-that-Be about the power of calculation over the reliance on machines.

"What's the purpose of Life, if you won't Know?" he demands in what seems to be a fit of madness. . . except he really isn't mad- just Misunderstood Genius.

So when you watch this movie-- Pay Attention to Dr. Benson. He IS the center of this movie.

And try to identify the classical string piece that always starts playing when Dr. Benson hits intellectual revelation!
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amusing and visually interesting spaghetti space-opera
jamesrupert201415 November 2019
Antonio Margheriti's second space opera, 'Battle of the Worlds' finds Earth threatened by fleets of flying saucers coming from a rogue planet (the "Outsider") that has wandered into our solar system. Veteran A-list actor Claude Rains plays Prof. Benson, a cantankerous and supercilious scientist who figures out is going on (it's odd to see Rains starring in an obscure spaghetti-space opera only a year before working with David Lean on 'Lawrence of Arabia'). I watched an adequately dubbed version so I can't comment on the acting (except for a hammy, English-speaking Rains), or script but the story, if implausible, is entertaining and the special effects have that gaudy but imaginative look that characterises Italian space operas of the era. The idea that the rogue planet is actually some kind of 'space ark' sent out by a dying species (as deduced by Benson based on very little data) is clever and poetic but the scenes in which the refugees are found dead at the controls are unfortunately almost indecipherable (this could be due to the quality of the version I was watching on-line). The film is similar to Margheriti's first space opera, 1960's 'Space Men' and both films, while having weaknesses, are better than most of their American contemporaries, which were too focussed on big bugs and the teenage drive-in market to offer up much in the way of ideas.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Italy Space
BandSAboutMovies2 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Known in Italy as l Pianeta degli uomini spenti (The Planet of Extinct Men), this was directed by Anthony Dawson, who is better known everywhere other than America as Antonio Margheriti.

Dr. Fred Steele (Umberto Orsini, The Antichrist) and Eve Barnett (Maya Brent in her only acting role) are looking forward to leaving the island that they work on and getting married. However, a rogue planet called The Outsider is on a collision course with our world so no time for love Dr. Steele. However, Professor Benson (Claude Rains in one of his last acting roles) - who lives away from mankind with his dog Gideon - believes that our world is safe. No one else agrees and some, like Commander Robert Cole (Bill Carter, who is also in Larry Buchanan's fantasy The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald) and his wife Cathy (Jacqueline Derval) travel to the planet to see how they can stop it.

The Outsider doesn't hit the Earth but does something even odder. It goes into orbit around the planet. As Earth ships approach, flying saucers attack and The Outsider begins spiraling into the atmosphere causing disasters. A team is sent to investigate the planet and Benson believes that some intelligence is controlling all of these ships and the planet itself.

In the final attack, Cathy is mortally wounded and Benson refuses to leave, as he believes that life without scientific knowledge is not a life at all. He tries to communicate with the computer at the core of all of the planet - the crew is long dead - but it's too late as nuclear warheads blow out. The planet real good. The movie closes with Benson's dog Gideon waiting for him. Way to break my heart.

Writer Ennio De Concini also adapted The Four of the Apocalypse for the screen, wrote The Girl Who Knew Too Much and directed Hitler: The Last Ten Days, Daniele e Maria and Gli 11 Moschettieri. He's listed as Vassilij Petrov in the credits. This film re-teams he and Margheriti after Assignment: Outer Space.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed