High Tide at Noon (1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Gentle and enjoyable with a subtle power.
dwtaxi3 October 2006
This is the tale of the collapse of a fishing community from the eyes of a girl at the heart of it. Gentle and warming, though with some much darker scenes the film has that elusive quality which holds the interest of the viewer throughout. Like many Rank movies it falls more towards the TV movie than Hollywood showcase, but still far superior to a mere television work.

Not an award winner or a well-loved treasure, High Tide at Noon is nonetheless a very watchable film and an pleasant way to spend an afternoon. The actress does have a certain naivety, but that is part of the charm of the picture.

I recommend this movie to all those who yearn for a simpler time.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This Island, Earth.
Moor-Larkin4 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In my journey around McGoohan one of the first unseen movies of his that I got hold of was Three Sovereigns for Sarah. That was also made by Philip Leacock. High Tide at Noon was a much earlier film but it was remarkable that the two movies shared an apparent characteristic. That is, they both spend their first two thirds building carefully-drawn characters and then rush those people through the final third with episodic story-lines that cover years of time.

Betta St John, as Joanna, is evidently returning to an island after many years. Her old house is decrepit but a still-bonging clock gives her a shock and starts her reminiscence:

She is 17 and returning to her beloved island home after schooling 'on the mainland'. We meet the main narrative protagonists. The Brecks are a ne'er-do-well family. Joanna is scion of the historic owners of the island, the Mackenzies. She is also torn between three lovers. There is the bad boy, Simon Breck, played by McGoohan. There is Nils Sorenson, the good boy, played by Michael Craig. Joanna sees Nils as a brother but Simon excites her emerging female sexuality. Simon does have a passion for her but oversteps the mark in his physical demands, destroying any chance he may have had of gaining her love, whilst simultaneously alienating Nils as well.

Into their lives comes Alec Douglas, played by William Sylvester. He quotes some poetry to Joanna and she's in love. Sadly, Alec turns out to be a gambler and over the next three years is fleeced by Simon at the card table. He ends up owing $600, which, in 1957 Nova Scotia was big bucks.

Nils and the rest of the islanders keep busy by fleecing the seas around the island and soon Alec isn't the only one who is facing insolvency. The lobsters have run out. The islanders may have to follow.

Old Man Mackenzie (Alexander Knox) is something of a tough old egg, softened by his wife, Flora Robson. He has had a falling-out with his eldest son, played by Patrick Allen, who married in secret after getting his girl in the 'family way' (1957 - remember!).

Joanna's husband finally realises he is wasting his life and her love, so turns over a new leaf. Sadly, almost simultaneously he turns over his boat and drowns. Another Mackenzie brother, played by Peter Arne, appears to have caused this by getting everyone drunk and after the funeral he leaves both island and regrets. This son is the first of the patriarchal family to leave. Soon the others are to go too.

Simon isn't too bothered about the lobsters. After waiting a decent period he heads for the widow-woman. Making plain that he knows what she needs and that he's the man to give it to her, he is annoyed when Joanna refuses to take his bait. Joanna runs away from his advances and realising the insult to her, Nils furiously heads to the Breck cabin to avenge her honour. It is at this point that the first 'hollow note' is struck by the movie. Simon flees the island in terror, never to be seen again.

After this the film fragments rapidly. Clearly epic story lines like these family sagas can quickly become monumental. This one becomes a fallen monument. Nils is rejected by Joanna one more time and leaves the island without even saying goodbye, although he does leave a note. Soon the lobster-free zone is empty, even old-man Mackenzie is forced out. Like the inhabitants of Easter Island these people have consumed their resources and exhausted their potential. A Global Warning for us all...... should anyone be listening.

This movie was entered into the 1957 Cannes Festival. Patrick McGoohan took a trip there and met Jean Cocteau, which must have been nice for him. And Patrick...... ;-)

Oh, and at the end, like emerging humans after a Nuclear War, Joanna, back in the present day, spots Nils on the beach.

"The Lobsters are Back" smiles Nils as he hugs his life-long love.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"The Lobsters Are Back!!"
richardchatten13 January 2020
Having demonstrated a flair for drama against offbeat backdrops, director Philip Leacock was promoted to making this ambitious adaptation of Elisabeth Ogilvie's 1944 novel (the first of a trilogy of which only this was filmed), which although entered by Rank at Cannes has since fallen so totally off the radar it isn't in either Maltin or Halliwell's.

It's all rather dour, and perhaps the lack of children denied Leacock the inspiration that gave life to his earlier films. Although resembling a French silent film - or thirties British attempts at neo-realism 'Turn of the Tide' and 'Edge of the World' - to judge from the ammount of process work and studio exteriors, most of the interesting supporting cast plainly never left Britain for the dialogue scenes.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lack lustre and tedious.
geoffm6029517 July 2020
A film shot in black and white about the economic challenges and risks which confront a fishing community in Nova Scotia. Thrown into the mix is a dull love affair which seems to limp along but without ever sparking interest. Some films are better shot in black and white, but given the dour plot and the uninspired acting, the film would have been enhanced by technicolour, since it would have least shown the dramatic and rugged nature of this rugged, but beautiful part of Canada. What was particularly irritating however, were several members of the British cast, all trying and failing to sound Canadian. The lack lustre storyline is not helped by the main lead, Michael Craig, giving a fairly wooden and unconvincing performance. The talents of Patrick McGoohan were wasted, playing a nasty and temperamental fisherman, but to be fair, the poor dialogue and the limited time he has on screen, didn't really give him the opportunity to develop his character. Patrick Allan, the perennial B film actor, comes in and out of the film without making any real impact! An underwhelming, low energy film, which fails to sustain interest.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not bad
Tony_J612 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Watched this movie on ABC, Australia in the early hours of this morning.

Some scenes seem to end without much follow-up. For instance, when Patrick McGoohan's character is chased off the island. This movie was made a few years before 'Dangerman', but McGoohan still had that menacing look (Albeit ridiculous accent) that invited further storyline to that scene.

Betta St John (Related to the Producer?) was quite charming, although extremely naive. Definitely an unconvincing widow when her hubby is mysteriously killed whilst rowing his relatives home. (Another unexplained scene). Not a tear was shed!

Overall, a fairly harmless romp through a small fishing community of the 50's.

Easily forgettable.
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Atypical Rank film
malcolmgsw10 March 2020
This is a strange film for Rank to produce..It is difficult to work out who it would appeal to.Although there is location work there is a lot of process work. There are a lot of Rank contract actors trying to give an approximation of a Canadian accent.A film which has deservedly been forgotten about
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A bit dull, unless you like love stories
NellsFlickers1 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Not quite my type of movie (a bit too "chick") but I gave it a go anyway as it was on my McGoohan-Watch-List.

In short, a rather dumb female lead and too many questions (DID Simon rape Joanna? Who is that official who seems connected with all the lobstermen leaving the island? Did Charles' wife & baby turn out OK? Joanna didn't know that her husband-to-be gambled?) help to ruin things. For the most part, the acting was OK, and in fact it was my favorite cast-member's performance that I had issue with.

I knew before-hand that Patrick McGoohan's character was a louse. Many of his female fans absolutely LOVE him as the young trouble-maker Simon in this film. I understand why, but to me he has no truly GOOD scenes or dialogue. The few love scenes of McGoohan's career were never very convincing, and perhaps here the room's shadows allow the viewer (especially ladies) to "fill in the blanks" as to what he is doing. His choice of accent also wasn't the best. His natural voice probably would have been a better fit, though still too "Irish-English" for a story set in Canada.

In later interviews, McGoohan never had anything good to say about his years with Rank. I doubt he was all that proud of this film, especially when you see how the studio was then promoting him as a rising young film star, something he really seemed to hate.

I am probably being too harsh. Don't run from this film, just know it isn't perfect, not exactly "action packed", and definitely not worthy of Cannes 1957... which it didn't win any awards at...
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed