Triple Deception (1956) User Reviews

entertaining B thriller based in France

[happytrigger-64-390517 · 6/10 · 3 April 2016]

For a french reviewer like me who love film noir, House Of Secrets is an absolute entertaining movie. I first loved all the Parisian locations (around rue du Bac, l'île Saint-Louis, Eiffel tower, rue Lamarck, an unknown restaurant) and Marseille.

The plot with impersonation is interesting with some fine twists. The fights are real fast paced, destroying the furniture more violently than in American serials. The cinematography by Harry Waxman is very colorful and shadowy. The editing by the brilliant Sidney Hayers (soon to direct Circus Of Horrors and Burn Witch Burn) is real fast and raw.

The best surprise again for a french reviewer is the casting of Gérard Oury as a badman, very surprising when you see his future top box office movies with Bourvil and Louis de Funès as a director...

Swell souvenir.

Prototype Bond

[Leofwine_draca · 7/10 · 29 March 2018]

HOUSE OF SECRETS is a French-set British thriller with much to recommend it. The clever plot sees the underrated Michael Craig going undercover as a small-time crook in order to bring down a large and ruthless criminal organisation. There's plenty of suspense and action here, the latter taking the form of some surprisingly brutal and protracted fight sequences set in hotel rooms and the like. This gives the film a modernity and realism that, for me, made it feel like an early Bond movie. Craig is a dependable hero and there's a solid cast to support him, including Geoffrey Keen and Brenda de Banzie, who was equally sinister in THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH. The plot begins slowly but draws you in to a break-neck climax and you'll enjoy every moment of it.

ship's officer takes identity of crook to uncover counterfeiting gang in espionage thriller.

[rogerjillings · 6/10 · 25 April 2005]

The film that made Michael Craig is a well paced colourful crime thriller shot in the location of Paris where Craig is mistakenly taken for a known smuggler who he resembles quite uncannily & is persuaded to go under-cover to infiltrate a counterfeiting organisation & also keep his cover with his smuggling colleagues.Apart from falling for the same local cabaret singer (Julia Arnall)who the real Steve Chancellor was enmeshed with, & the double crossing begins & along the way he struggle's to get to the truth until the climatic finale to unmask the ring leaders which include Brenda De Banzie & the ice cool menace of Anton Diffring.

The First James Bond Film

[hotmailmob · 7/10 · 30 September 2018]

As I was watching this I started to notice that the story arc seemed familiar. This 1956 film has all of the hallmarks of the 1960's James Bond films. The gangs, the double-crosses, the big schemes, the villain bosses, and the women. It's not a bad yarn.

Lots Of Two-Fisted Espionage

[boblipton · 6/10 · 28 January 2024]

Steve Chancellor is dead. That causes a crimp in a CIA sting operation on a gold-smuggling ring that is branching out into counterfeiting. Fortunately, seaman Michael Craig looks exactly like him, so he is inserted into the operations. As he gets into fist fights with various members of the group,he gradually moves up in the operations, until he is able to lead the law enforcement operations directly to the people. They are holding off until they can grab everyone, so Craig has to continue the impersonation. However, the bad guys have a plant in the Surete.

I's a nice spies-vs-crooks thriller, with an able cast that includes Brenda de Banzies, David Kousof, Gerard Oury, and Eric Pohlmann, running from Paris to Marseilles. Of course it's almost all shot on sets, with a few stock photos to lend that ambience so desired by big movie concerns. Guy Green directs with an eye owards thrills more than character exposition, and the ultimate solution is not what I expected, which is a good thing in the murky world of the CIA.

Uninteresting B Movie

[Theo Robertson · 4/10 · 9 February 2005]

Larry Ellis bares a striking resemblance to a dead criminal whose smuggling gang's activities threaten the economy of the western world so the CIA recruit him to take on the dead man's identity to infiltrate the gang

The above is the premise for HOUSE OF SECRETS . It's maybe not a groundbreaking idea but it's a solid one similar to WHITE HEAT which I had the pleasure of seeing again a few days previously . With both movies you know where the story is going and that it's only a matter of time before the undercover agent gets found out . But where as in WHITE HEAT the audience are kept on the edge of their seats by the intelligent script HOUSE OF SECRETS is rather uninvolving and seems somewhat underdeveloped , a case in point is when Larry is asked to meet " The girl " . He doesn't know which girl the gang are talking about , so instead of the gang members physically taking him to meet the girl thereby blowing his cover due to his ignorance Larry goes to meet his CIA contact to ask what girl the gang are referring to . Things like this means the script misses the opportunity to create nail biting tension and makes the movie rather uninvolving

A Rank Thriller

[malcolmgsw · 5/10 · 25 May 2018]

First to clear up any misunderstandings this was Ranks attempt at an A feature.As usual it lacks originality.The substituted agent must have been used many times prior to this.Michael Craig gives a lacklustre performance with a truly awful mid Atlantic accent.The colour photogrAphy and the views of Paris are the best features of a truly forgettable film

More an 'A-' movie than a 'B' movie...

[mrghurby · 9/10 · 27 March 2018]

For me, a thoroughly enjoyable, well-paced, beautifully shot and above-par acted thriller.

The locations are interesting and vibrant, the fight scenes are well choreographed, fast (for their time) and thus more realistic than most I've seen from this period and the plot twist interesting enough, even 60 years later.

It is for me, slightly reminiscent of a Hitchcock thriller with elements of an early Bond film. It also reminds me of a very good 1950s 'story for boys'.

I have given it a 9/10 simply to try and counterbalance the unfairly low rating it has so far received - in reality I would rate it a 7 or 7½.

Recommended to anyone interested in film-noir, 1950s Paris and/or appreciative of the beauty of mid-century Technicolor.

Non stop action

[jameselliot-1 · 8/10 · 18 January 2021]

Michael Craig would have been a terrific James Bond. I don't know if he was ever screen tested. He had the look and physical abilities. The story has more twists than a mountain road and a climax right out of a Bond film. Arnall and Bates brought eye candy and acting skills. The fight scenes were brutal and more realistic than the usual phoney slugfest.

Simple good old brit stuff

[sg-78949 · 10/10 · 20 February 2020]

With such a cast list could this go wrong well there was a chance that some actors were miscast but on the whole the film and its mission were successful on a tight budget one thing that wasn't tight was the charming actress of supreme quality brenda de banzie wow what a women who could oozes sex appeal fully dressed by the sparkle in her eyes and a smile so wide and a hint of naughtiness simply having her in this makes it a 10

Another underrated British movie

[mch2469 · 8/10 · 8 September 2019]

I just watched this film and having also read these reviews here I certainly agree with 2 of them...

Definitely this is an A rather than a B and is no doubt this has all the hallmarks of prototype Bond film.

I finished watching this movie thinking how much I would have enjoyed Michael Craig as the first James Bond.... I'm saying that based on putting aside Sean Connery's role and rather thinking of Craig being the first to play the role in the Bond franchise...

I personally think we would look back at the first Bond film (franchise that is) and might well consider Craig to have been the quintessential Bond as perhaps Ian Fleming might have seen him when discussing a film adaptation of his book... I know Fleming was more minded towards Christopher Lee, to some degree, especially as Lee had actually lived that role in his wartime experiences... however, I think Michael Craig would have brought a piece of every later Bond we have come to know.

I really enjoyed this film, I think some parts were rushed; probably to keep within a set time for cinema purposes but I would have preferred to see those edits kept in the film as the running time wasn't a factor as I watched... I have a habit of first forwarding on some occasions or making tea... scenes like the death/murder of a supporting character by the baddies or Craig's diversion on his way to the airport to name but a few.

Overall I really enjoyed this film and the performance of Michael Craig.... I've seen him many times before and this character and his performance stood out to me as he really added to the whole story ...

I'm not someone that cares to much about cinematography, editing, plot holes or having to suspend belief .... a film for me is good if it takes my eye off the time and allows me to just enjoy it without thinking about what's going to happen next. ( I hate spoiling it for myself by working out who did it, how they did it or who will win etc let's be frank we can all do that to some degree and I never get why reviewers always seem to want to tell us how quickly they managed it or how unbelievable a film was {Its a film... they are all unbelievable... if anyone wants believable then watch a documentary!}... sorry I'm digressing)

So I would recommend this film if you want to escape looking at that watch for 90 odd minutes and enjoying a good old adventure yarn.

WWG1WGA