I Love Trouble (1948) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
From the school of Raymond Chandler, an obscure film noir that packs a punch
bmacv10 October 2003
Don't be put off by the frisky title: I Love Trouble isn't one of those dismal crime-cum-comedy hybrids so inexplicably popular in the '40s (true, a bantering element tries to creep in from time to time but it's held mercifully at bay; one routine, however, starring a hash-slinger named Miss Phipps, deserves to be bronzed).

It's a pretty hard-boiled private-eye yarn, very much in the Raymond Chandler tradition - maybe a bit too much. More specifically, I Love Trouble follows the footsteps tramped out by Murder, My Sweet and The Lady in the Lake, and follows them doggedly. And its subsidiary roles are filled with actors who make up a Who's Who of film noir: Janice Carter, Adele Jergens, John Ireland, Raymond Burr (barely visible, alas), Tom Powers, Eduardo Ciannelli, Steven Geray, Sid Tomack. Parts even smaller (it's a big cast) are filled to the brim with apt characterization.

The principal role of the gumshoe, however, goes to Franchot Tone, who plays it very much in the Powell-and-Mongomery-as-Marlowe style. He's hired by a tough businessman (Powers) to keep tabs on his elusive wife (Lynn Merrick). Tone traces the obligatory route from low dives to high places in his quest, from back alleys in Portland and fish dumps near the oil derricks of Santa Monica (Chandler's corrupt `Bay City') to gated mansions where swimming pools sparkle amid manicured lawns. All Tone knows is that, back in '46 (or was it '41?), Merrick came down from Oregon, where he learns that she was a bubble dancer in a mobbed-up nightclub, who absconded to Southern California with a cheesy comic (Tomack).

Or did she? When another woman claiming to be Merrick's sister (Janet Blair) fails to recognize her picture, Tone finds himself with a lot of pieces none of which seem to fit together. And the heavies from up north are joined by powerful folks in Los Angeles who firmly discourage him from looking any further (when he's not being eyed fetchingly by expensive wives and mistresses, he's conked on the head or drugged up at every turn). Getting warmer, he tries to coax more information from Tomack, only to find the funny fishmonger dead and himself a suspect. But when Merrick's body washes up under a pier, her death opens more questions than it answers....

The director, S. Sylvan Simon, shows considerable promise which was not to be redeemed (he died, at age 41, three years after making this movie). But most of the credit, however derivative, should probably accrue to its writer, and author of the novel on which it's based, Roy Huggins; he also penned Too Late For Tears, Woman in Hiding and Pushover, and, moving to television, would create 77 Sunset Strip, The Fugitive, and The Rockford Files. It goes to show how cracking the books at the school of Raymond Chandler can pay off in the future. So what if I Love Trouble is knockoff Chandler, a cocktail shaken up from two films made from his novels? Chandler neat is a potent shot - even watered down it holds its deep, smoky flavor.
59 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nifty Noir
bkoganbing28 February 2012
Roy Huggins who later wrote and produced and gained a big reputation on the small screen for quality, wrote the mystery novel on which this film is based. I Love Trouble clearly shows the influence of Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler in both plot and characters.

Franchot Tone is our protagonist private eye Stu Bailey, a character name that would recur again on the big and small screen. Tom Powers hires him to find his missing wife. On the trail he's aided and abetted by his loyal girl Friday Glenda Farrell who is the most memorable character in the film in a movie chock full of good character performances.

A lot of people are interested in this woman including millionaire wife Janis Carter, her 'sister' Janet Blair, sleazy nightclub owner Steven Geray and his henchmen who include John Ireland and Raymond Burr. They're a memorable bunch, but almost as memorable as Farrell are spoiled wife Adele Jergens who makes a big play for Tone and nightclub comic Sid Tomack who is not above a little information peddling on the side that costs him dear.

I'm surprised Tone did not do more roles like this. He certainly displayed the proper and expected laconic behavior for a private detective. It was that typecasting he could never get away from. The studio brass wanted him in formal evening wear dispensing bon mots and generally losing the girl in A films to the likes of Clark Gable at his first studio MGM.

I Love Trouble is not anything like the Julia Roberts/Nick Nolte film of more recent vintage. Instead it's a nifty noir mystery from Columbia. In fact it's really two mysteries that sort of get jumbled together in Tone's investigation. Hopefully that whets your appetite to see it.
33 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I Love Trouble.
maarck627 February 2018
I was interested in seeing this after just reading and reviewing the novel on Amazon. A pretty good adaptation, containing scenes and dialogue lifted directly from Huggins' novel. The story has been speeded up and abbreviated, and some of the names have been changed, but if you liked the novel you'll like the movie. Probably one of a million in 1948, but well worth watching for now because of Franchot Tone, the smarty pants Glenda Farrell (The Mystery Of The Wax Museum, Torchy Blaine), and early roles by Raymond Burr (Perry Mason), John Ireland (any number of John Wayne movies).and the prolific character actor Arthur Space. This convoluted movie and the novel were written by the great Roy Huggins (The Fugitive, Rockford Files, and 77 Sunset Strip, which was based on this movie and his novel), and directed by S. Sylvan Simon who died at age forty-two soon after this was released. For those who want to look up the novel, the ending is identical. Enjoy, enjoy.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Plethora of Hotties From Your Grandmother's Era
poindexter_mellon23 October 2018
I could not figure out who was who in this impossibly complex story. Until the very end I thought the various babes were all the same person. I have no idea who did what to whom, who was married to whom, who died, who was good, who was bad, nothing, a total mystery. Still it was pretty enjoyable.
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Despite the odd casting of Tone and a rather confusing plot, it's a very good example of noir.
planktonrules24 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I love film noir and it is among my favorite genres. So, when I had a chance to see "I Love Trouble", it's not surprising I'd watch it. And I am very glad I saw it and I am close to giving the film an 8.

The film begins with a private detective following a man's wife. This confused me, as seeing Franchot Tone playing the detective seemed odd. He wasn't exactly the hard-boiled detective sort and his role seemed more like something for Robert Mitchum or even Dick Powell. Now I am NOT saying Tone was bad here--but he physically seemed a little too scrawny for such a role and wasn't quite tough enough to carry it off (like, say, Humphrey Bogart). The reason he's following the lady is that the husband says he thinks she's in trouble--but what sort he isn't certain. And, as Tone follows the clues, he learns that she had an entirely different life in an entirely different town. But, there is MUCH more to the plot than this--and, confusing as it sometimes gets, it's pretty good. The only major problem I had was the need for some exposition by one of the characters near the end to explain the plot--and this is just sloppy writing. But, the film had a nice noir atmosphere, snappy dialog and a fair share of killings and beatings to make it a good representation of this style of film. Worth seeing.

Oh, and by the way, you can watch or copy this public domain film for free--just follow the link from IMDb.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Oh Bailey you're about as subtle as a Mickey Finn."
utgard144 May 2020
Ok film noir that has a plot similar to that of dozens of other noir and B detective pictures: private eye is hired to find a dame and twists ensue. There's nothing inherently wrong with this movie. It's actually pretty solid. But it's very familiar territory and the script isn't as snappy as I would like. Franchot Tone is also a bit flat. I doubt it would be a blip on anyone's radar if not for it apparently being considered lost for decades. Amusingly this was written by Roy Huggins, the creator of TV shows like Maverick and The Fugitive. He would use the character played by Tone to greater success later in 77 Sunset Strip.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining Noir - Shame there isn't a decent print around
bozopolis8 January 2019
I read the other reviews so I had to add my two cents. I liked Franchot Tone as the Private Eye. It would be easy to underestimate his toughness. The story is well written and well played by the actors. Glenda Farrell's part was especially entertaining. Unlike a couple of other reviewers I didn't find it slow or dull at all. I liked the pace of the story and the dialogue. My only complaint was the very poor quality of the print. One reviewer mentioned seeing it at a festival. I'd love to see a better copy. It's a shame that the PD version out there is so awful. Still, it kept me entertained despite the terrible, almost unwatchable print. Fans of Raymond Chandler and Dashiell Hammett are bound to love the character Roy Huggins created for this film.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Just screened at Noir City 5 in SF - awesome!
filmnoirist1 February 2007
A new print of "I Love Trouble" was just screened last night (1/31/07) at Noir City 5, San Francisco's noted film noir festival. (http://noircity.com)

In short, it was amazing. Roy Huggins was very heavily influenced by Dashiell Hammett, but let me tell you he could go toe to toe with the best Hammett had to offer. Every scene was filled with killer lines, right up to the last line of the film (Girl who wants to kiss the protagonist: "I didn't know there'd be a line." Girl who's kissing him: "Honey, this is the end of the line.") Franchot Tone is perfect as the suave but funny private dick who always has a wisecrack, thinks on his feet, and one heck of a set of...nerves.

This is a must-see for any film noir aficionado. Alas, it's not yet on DVD and was never on VHS; if you see it coming on cable, Tivo it, tape it, miss work, skip your vacation, stand up your date, do what it takes as long as you DON'T MISS THIS GEM.

JL
66 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spotty Detective Film
dougdoepke24 July 2014
A detective is hired to investigate the real identity of client's wife, leading him into a tangled thicket of leads.

So where is Janie Joy. Detective Bailey's having a heckuva time finding out, what with all those luscious ladies parading in and out—not that I'm complaining. But the sorting process does get difficult at times. This is a detective story, and not classic noir, more like Philo Vance than Phillip Marlowe. LA-area locations are emphasized rather than light and shadow. But it is a good look at post-war LA, including the photogenic Buster Buffin's Buffett.

As the detective, the slender Tone brings a different kind of appeal. Wisely, the screenplay emphasizes his verbal skills rather than tough-guy brawn. In fact, he almost gets shoved around enough to embarrass fall-guy Elisha Cook Jr. Still, Tone does have a ready smile and easy charm. But that's also a problem for the movie. In short, characters and events lack the kind of grit needed to generate needed menace. Sure, there is a guessing game as to where Janie Joy is, but it's more like a brain-teaser than a fear factor. Plus, screenwriter Huggins clearly knows his way around wisecracks and clever banter. Yet the story's architecture remains murky and plodding. All in all, this is a movie of individual scenes rather than memorable whole.

Nonetheless, it's a good chance to ogle the ladies and their 40's fashions, along with Detroit's four-wheel designs, post-war, that is.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Light and likeable
Leofwine_draca20 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
A less well-known film noir, I LOVE TROUBLE provides plenty of entertainment value in its running time. The protagonist is a private investigator looking into a wife's mysterious background, and the usual visits by heavies and unexpected murders make up the plot. This one's light on atmosphere and Hollywood stardom but has a good helping of comedy throughout that helps to make it a light and likeable piece of filmmaking despite the darker aspects of the story.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK if you don't care whether a plot makes sense
RickeyMooney23 September 2020
The Big Sleep (1946) starring Humphrey Bogart created a template for what we'd now call detective noir, and the somewhat less charismatic Franchot Tone in this film assumes the role of the tough, wise-cracking but incorruptible private eye.

Some of these films' plots held together better than others. Those in the latter group, like this one, tried to make up for it by moving too fast for you to keep track.

This one touches all the bases: the seemingly routine case that leads the hero into a confused web of intrigue; the client whose motives are obscure; the detective getting beat within an inch of his life but somehow escaping and no worse for wear the next day; the guy with the gun being surprised by the guy standing behind him with a gun; and women who instantly throw themselves at the detective the moment they see him.

The film's chief distinction is the number of women in that last category. Since they all look remarkably similar and most of them seem to have at least two identities, anyone who tells you they followed the plot is either a genius or lying.

In fact, after after the plot is explained, sort of, at the end, you may feel none the wiser. I didn't, and thinking about it afterwards and reading a summary online didn't help.

So if you like the noir look and snappy dialogue, go for it. Unfortunately the only print available online has occasional sound track distortion and brief video gaps, and is definitely not HD. A clean print might be worth another star or two.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I love I LOVE TROUBLE - great fun!
adrianovasconcelos1 October 2021
Frankly, I had never heard of director S. Sylvan Simon, I knew little about Franchot Tone (still do) and even less about Janet Blair, and I watched a truly decrepit copy of this flick ... still, I'm glad I did, because this is one of the most fun noir thrillers I have ever watched.

Tone delivers the closest thing to a perfect unassuming performance. His portrait of PI Stuart Bailey resonates with candor, notably when he admits that he leaves physical fighting to others. Blair is equally fun, heading a gallery of beauties like Janis Carter, Adele Jergens and Glenda Farrell.

Great action sequences, difficult to comment on quality of photography because of the poor copy, but I'm really glad that I stuck it out.

Greatly recommended!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quirky with nice elements.
mollytinkers9 May 2021
The seriously low reviews and seriously high reviews are unwarranted, in my opinion. Of course, all art is subjective, so I write with due respect that this film is really good.

The plot, albeit convoluted, is actually quite neat, in olden terms. It sums itself up at the end of the film, which is standard; yet it didn't disappoint, at least not to me. Therein comes the subjectivity.

I agree with the reviewer who expressed disdain for the film score, but I disagree that it drags the film down to a failure. The musical themes are overused. I can't help but wonder if the director, or perhaps the producers/studio, felt the film needed dramatic enforcement and thereby overworked the score.

Tone's casting is dubious at best, but he did a great job. The reviewer who commented on the vivacious performance of his secretary was spot on. I also concede that it dragged about halfway through.

I'm making a wish that the Film Noir Foundation restores this one.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
And trouble loves company.
mark.waltz26 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Trouble could be her middle name as this bubble dancer reveals secrets about her past with the help of some truly bizarre characters. Private detective Franchot Tone must find out the past of the wife of his client and what he ends up with is more trouble than love can handle. Along the way he meets a bunch of shady characters curious to find out why he's trying to find out info on this person, including some shady nightclub proprietors, a cockney waitress with an incredible gift of twisting conversations away from the questions being asked her. Then there's the sister of the investigated dame whose presence instantly brings a ton of other questions, not all of which will be answered.

This features a truly smart alecky screenplay and plenty of twists and turns that make you say, "huh?" until the end which in a second's notice becomes "Ah ha!" When you've got females involved like Janet Blair, Adele Jergens, Janis Carter and Glenda Farrell, you know that the wisecracks and double entendres will be coming fast and furious. Veteran Farrell seems to be emulating Lee Patrick from "The Maltese Falcon" as Tone's no nonsense secretary. Such great character actors as Eduardo Cianelli, John Ireland and Steven Geray add on interesting male characterizations, with Geray reminding me of all the other thick accented Europeans after World War II whose foreign persona instantly indicated something shady. In one of his earliest roles, Raymond Burr shows off his expertise at villainy, his specialty until TV cast him as a hero detective like Tone's character.

Tone, a veteran of a few classic thrillers of this nature, doesn't rival Bogart for the type of sly wisecracks he's given. While the Los Angeles locations of the 1940's offer a feeling of nostalgia (including a visit to the Santa Monica pier), the plot requires more of a road map than Tone's travels. This is the type of film to watch on the big screen (preferably as part of a film noir festival) so you don't have any distractions. If only the story wasn't so off the beat and path and the twist at the end so darned ordinary, this might have rated a bit higher. Still great fun for film noir buffs, though.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So Hard to Follow
evanston_dad30 March 2023
I have trouble following complicated plots under the best of circumstances. I always have to watch things with my wife so she can explain them to me. So I didn't have a prayer with this ridiculously complicated movie. I have never seen so many characters in such a short film.

But convoluted plots are a common feature of noirs, and I've learned not to try too hard with them, since the plots rarely matter and us die-hard noir fans come for the atmosphere and the terse one-liners. "I Love Trouble" has a good share of both. Franchot Tone may not be my favorite noir anti-hero, but he'll do in a pinch. And Janet Blair is super fetching in the "is she or isn't she?" role of a woman who may be genuine or may be playing our protagonist for everything he's worth. Raymond Burr has a blink-and-you'll-miss-it cameo, because of course he does. What noir would be complete without an appearance by Raymond Burr?

It's unfortunate that the print I saw of this on TCM was so poor. Some scenes, like those set outside at night, are so dark that you literally can't see what's happening. But it's also a very rare, obscure film, so I guess I should be happy that I was able to see it at all.

Grade: B.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disappointing
expandafter9 September 2009
For one thing, I didn't find Franchot Tone convincing as a tough private investigator.

As the film progressed, I didn't feel that I was gaining any insight into what was going on inside the characters heads. They remained ciphers.

The plot, which is more confusing than engrossing, crawls along and never gains any momentum.

I found the background music irritating and distracting. If a film is good, why does it need lush music to induce the right mood in the viewer?
18 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So SO
artpf31 October 2013
A wealthy man hires a detective to investigate his wife's past. The detective (Franchot Tone) discovers that the wife had been a dancer and left her home town with an actor. The latter is killed before he can talk, but, with the help of a showgirl, the detective learns that the wife had used stolen papers from a girl friend to enter college after she had stolen $40,000 from the night club where she worked. The detective eventually learns that the husband had killed his wife when he discovered her past in order to avoid a scandal, and had hired the detective to try and frame him for the killing.

To me the measure of a good film is one that engages you from frame one.

This one not so much. It's slow and plodding. OK if you have nothing else to do, but you might find your mind wandering.
6 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Witty repartee of private eye yarn keeps our interest despite dubious casting of lead role, atrocious score and convoluted plot
Turfseer26 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I Love Trouble was written by Roy Huggins based on his novel The Double Take. Huggins went on to become the writer/creator of such major TV series as Maverick, The Fugitive and The Rockford Files. One can tell there's some high quality dialogue in I Love Trouble, reminiscent of films based on Raymond Chandler novels. Most notable is the witty repartee between Huggins' protagonist private eye Stuart Bailey (Franchot Tone) and the various women he interacts with throughout the film.

Unfortunately (despite the great dialogue), I Love Trouble has all the trappings of a "B" potboiler due to a number of factors which have led me to slightly downgrade the film's overall rating.. First is the casting of Franchot Tone in the lead role. Tone is passable as the private eye tasked with investigating the sordid past of ambitious politician Ralph Johnston's (Tom Powers) wife but the film would have been much better had a cynical Dick Powell or a hard-edged Bogart been cast in the role.

Another major factor leading to the downgrade is the insufferable score which intrusively rears its ugly head throughout most of the picture. This is the type of music you would expect to hear watching Superman on television and not a high class private eye yarn. And finally there's the convoluted plot which I will attempt to decipher in the following paragraphs.

While on the trail of Mrs. Johnston (Lynn Merrick-whom we only see at the beginning of the film and later toward the end when she's found murdered), Bailey uncovers her sordid past in Portland where she apparently was married to Keller (Steven Geray), a nightclub owner, and ended up adopting the identity of another dancer at the nightclub, Jane Breeger, stole $40,000 from the club, then changed her name to Janie Joy and disappeared.

If that isn't complicated enough, Norma Shannon (Janet Blair) shows up looking for her long-lost sister, Janie Joy and doesn't recognize a picture Bailey has in his possession whom he believes is Joy. Soon enough we're introduced to Mrs. Caprillo (Janis Carter), married to the socially prominent John Vega Caprillo (Eduardo Ciannelli) who turns out to be the real Jane Breeger who used to work with Mrs. Johnston.

The Caprillos offer Bailey a bribe to drop his investigation, and at certain points Bailey is also being chased and eventually kidnapped and roughed up by some of Keller's henchmen (including John Ireland and Raymond Burr as two of Keller's goons). Apparently all of Bailey's opponents are trying to protect their reputations after being associated with the toxic Mrs. Johnston.

Along the way, a couple of people are murdered including Buster Buffin (Sid Tomack), an entertainer who used to work with Johnston's wife who was murdered as well. In the end, it turns out it was Johnston who murdered Buffin and his wife in order to protect his reputation.

Tone and Blair manage to have the best dialogue as the love interest sparks fly throughout. Like some of his Chandler's film adaptations and other examples of these kinds of potboilers, the lack of screen time for a major player (the murder victim, Mrs. Johnston)-without flashbacks-adds to the confusion in an already convoluted plot.

Nonetheless the aforementioned witty repartee throughout keeps our interest despite all the detriments including the less than stellar casting of Tone, the atrocious score and simply trying to figure out what's going on from beginning to end.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I Love Trouble
CinemaSerf5 January 2023
This is quite a complex tale of murder, blackmail and impersonation. Wealthy Tom Powers ("Johnston") hires private investigator Franchot Tone ("Bailey") to investigate his wife. The digging reveals she had rather an unsavoury past as a dancer who hooked up with an actor and had pinched $40k from her old employers. She turns up dead under Malibu pier and Tone is soon prime suspect for Robert Barrat's "Lt. Quint". It moves along efficiently, with plenty of twists and turns and the support from the two ladies Janet Blair and Janis Carter as well as from John Ireland and a very brief appearance by Raymond Burr keep this drama running well - except, that is, for Tone. He is dreadful - a good looking man with all the charisma of a cheese plant; and virtually no natural abilities with the camera at all. It is also far too long - could have lost 20 minutes without detracting from the plot in any meaningful way. Worth a watch, though.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A fun, light noir
dgodoogle8 May 2021
The dialog in this flick makes it an instant classic. There's a lot of twist, turns and femme fatales. If you come across it, it's definitely worth the watch.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's raining women ! Hallelujah !
myriamlenys15 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
In which a private detective tries to unravel the past of one specific woman and discovers far more in the way of deceit, subterfuge and violence than he ever expected.

In many ways "I love trouble" is the quintessential private detective movie. All the ingredients are here : the wisecracking yet determined detective who's more shrewd than his enemies give him credit for, the vicious goons and gangsters who try to bribe, intimidate or kill him, the seemingly blameless citizens who've got an array of skeletons in their closet, and so on. And of course there's a variety of stunning "dames", nearly all of whom look as though they've stepped out of the pages of an expensive fashion magazine.

Now "I love trouble" may be overdoing things in its determination to serve up as many gorgeous actresses as possible, since the plot teems both with female characters and with references to female characters. After a while the jungle of women's names, pseudonyms and aliases grows so dense that even attentive viewers may long for a machete. Additionally, the overall legibility of the plot is not helped along by a wild abundance of twists and turns. "Complicated" doesn't cover it.

Happily much is redeemed by a fine lead performance by Franchot Tone, as the private detective. Now here's a man born to play the better class of gumshoe...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A soundtrack can make or break a film.
scifiartman12 February 2021
This is a perfect example of how a loud, overbearing, and sappy soundtrack can ruin an otherwise decent detective noir yarn. This blasting soundtrack tries waaay too hard to be the star of the film - creating whimsy and romance when none is necessary. So corny, and directionless, the soundtrack sounds more fitting for a two reel theater serial than for a complex and dark gumshoe adventure. This makes the film unwatchable, for me.

I don't see (or feel) Franchot Tone is right for a 40s noir detective. Shemp Howard could have done a more convincing job of it! All the sweeping fedoras and dangling cigarettes in the world can't make Tone fit into this role.

The ladies do a competent job here, but the involved (convoluted) writing and roles make the film a little hard to follow beyond the surface antics. But seeing beyond the awful, turn-on-a-dime soundtrack blasting in your face is near impossible, and brings this film down to a sad, subpar failure that can't make its mind up on what it wants to be - and ends up being a sappy, confused mess.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Interesting
bbcuddles1 January 2020
I loved it . I always love Franchot Tone movies. I was surprised at how good this movie actually was.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
i love trouble
mossgrymk20 May 2021
Stu Bailey without Jeff Spencer. Or Kookie. Or snappy writing that its scenarist would not learn about until he created "Maverick".
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Noir with a light touch
lor_14 April 2024
When I saw S. Sylvan Simon's name on the credits as the filmmaker, I knew immediately this would be a different type of picture. Like Billy Wilder, SSS's comedic background puts a different perspective on the whodunit/mystery genre, let alone its extension into the dark side of film noir.

I especially enjoyed the light and breezy approach of star Franchot Tone to his role as gumshoe, so different from the classical models. Right from the beginning of the saga, his raised eyebrow (a la The Rock) and reactions to the most violent and mortal situations he finds himself in has a debonair as well as carefree attitude. In other hands it would appear to be satire (like a Steve Martin "Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid" genre revision), but instead we're carried along with endless clues, switcheroos and blind alleys on almost a romp rather than a thriller.

Just the plethora of leading ladies in major roles is quite different from the norm and all of them add greatly to the narrative. Keeping all the twists and turns straight is quite a challenge, but the final confrontation scene of bringing all the pieces and dangling threads together is a marvel of prestidigitation. For me, it made the cleverness of "Knives Out" seem like child's play.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed