The Lady Is Willing (1934) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
How willing is she?
morrison-dylan-fan17 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
After having enjoyed watching a series of "Quota Quickie" DVDs for a poll being held on IMDbs Classic Film board for the best films of 1934,I started searching round online,and stumbled upon a great sounding Quota starring Leslie Howard,which led to me getting ready to meet the willing lady.

The plot:

Leaving the army behind, Albert Latour uses his savings to set himself up as a private detective.Getting a knock at the door,Latour opens it,and finds all of his old army buddies.Inviting them in,Latour discovers that the gang had connected their pension to a small business run by Gustav Dupont,who had closed the business down,and has left all of Latour's war pals penniless.

Horrified by Dupont's treatment,Latour tells his friends that he will go undercover,and get Dupont to give him their pension back.Dressing up in disguise,Dupont attends a party being held by Gustav Dupont.Originally thinking that Gustav would be the one in complete control of the family's cash,Dupont soon discovers a lady,who is waiting patiently for her major pay check.

View on the film:

Although the decades have sadly given the films print a real beating,director Gilbert Miller & cinematographer Joseph Walker's (who was Frank Capra's favourite cinematographer) most stylish moments are still able to shine,with Miller and Walker superbly using a blurred lens to show Gustav being unable to recognise Latour's change of outfits.For his adaptation of Louis Verneuil's play, Guy Bolton juggles his caper Comedy screenplay with dashes of Film Noir,thanks to matching Dupont's mad-cap costume changes with his friends being prepared to grip anyone who gets in the way of them getting their cash back.

Changing into different alias's, Leslie Howard gives a terrific performance as Albert Latour,that keeps Latour determination at the centre,whilst Howard jumps across the screen as a cunning charmer.Joining Howard,the pretty Binnie Barnes gives a great,slow- burn performance as Helene Dupont,that slowly changes Dupont from a sweet dame into a sly femme fatale,who smells her husbands cash,and is set to show what she is willing to do to get her hands on it.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Columbia's First English Production is a Harmless Piece of Fluff
boblipton13 March 2018
When Columbia decided to produce its first film in England, they made their usual canny and economical choices. After casting Leslie Howard in the lead and Cedric Hardwicke as the villain, they enlisted some up-and-coming talent like Binnie Barnes and Nigel Bruce. Gilbert Miller, who would become a distinguished stage producer, directed, and Joe Walker, Capra's favorite camera man was shipped over to Elstree.

The story, as adapted by Guy Bolton, is a bit of fluff: Hardwicke is a stock swindler, whose latest venture has gone bust, and private detective Leslie Howard is recruited to get the investors' money back. His plan is to persuade the villain that he wants to buy a property owned by Hardwicke's wife, Miss Barnes, for an outrageous sum, then kidnap the lady before her signature can be obtained. The ransom set will be the losses of the investors. However, Miss Barnes has a mind and grudges of her own....

Visually it's fine. I credit not only Walker, but set designer Oscar Werndorff. However, there is something off about the performances. Lines are tossed off too fast, as if nothing has any real emotional weight. In a year when Screwball Comedy was beginning to take shape in the United States -- and with the sexual quadrille between Howard, Barnes, Hardwicke and Kendall Lee as Hardwicke's mistress, it was made for screwball -- this is 1920s stage farce without the door slamming, with Howard donning military uniforms and beards and switching Hardwicke's spectacles to confuse him. I'm sure everyone shrugged their shoulders, said it was fine for a first effort and moved on. Miss Barnes and Mr. Bruce got footholds in the US, and everyone continued to work thereafter, usually in better projects.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tongue in cheek, screwball comedy
loloandpete25 April 2022
By no means a great movie but at only an hour and 15 minutes and played in a tongue in cheek, screwball comedy style, it romps along nicely. Curiously this is the one and only directing credit for Gilbert Miller, which is a shame as he showed potential here. The plot concerns an unscrupulous financial magnate who has swindled three men and causes them to be poverty stricken. They enlist the help of their old army captain and together they kidnap the magnate's wife for ransom, to restore their lost fortunes. Leslie Howard as the captain leads from the front here bringing a marvellous touch for light comedy to the proceedings and he spars and sparks with Binnie Barnes as the kidnapped wife very entertainingly. Cedric Hardwicke, a usually dull screen presence in my opinion rises to meet Howard and although he doesn't match him has some good moments of comic rotteness, being a cold hearted philanderer. Speaking of which, Kendall Lee also does good work here as his attractive mistress. Howard dons disguises throughout the film and so it is fitting that in one of them he assumes the persona of a doctor; When we meet the real doctor, he is played by Howard's real life brother Arthur in a nice portrayal. Howard's three cohorts are given little chance to shine, which is a pity as one of them is Nigel Bruce, who gets more prominence than the other two but is still rather underused. Likewise, Claud Allister, generally great fun as a chinless wonder type is given little to play with here as a business associate of Hardwicke. But this is an agreeable B movie comedy that you will enjoy of you are a fan of classic Hollywood fare.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Gustav Dupont is a real rat!
planktonrules4 May 2021
During the 1930s, many big American studios bought studios in Britain and made films there. Why? Because Parliament enacted a new law that mandated that a certain percentage of films be made domestically in order to apparently prevent American and European movies from driving the British companies out of business....in other words, it was a piece of protectionism. To deal with this new law, MGM, Warner Brothers and other studios set up shop in Britain...and "The Lady is Willing" is one made by Columbia's new British unit.

When the story begins, you learn that Gustav Dupont (Cedric Hardwicke) is an awful crook. He managed to destroy a company...bankrupting many...and leaving himself rich and out of jail. Because he is such a dishonest jerk, a group of men concoct a man with a private detective (Leslie Howard)...to kidnap Dupont's wife! Why and what will it achieve? See the film and find out for yourself.

It's enjoyable watching Leslie Howard in various disguises...as well as his real life brother playing a man that Leslie, for a time, impersonates. The plot is decent and enjoyable but not as rewarding or clever as it could have been. In other words, it's good...not great. A decent time-passer.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Minor British Film With Distinguished Cast
malcolmgsw27 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It is rather surprising to find Leslie Howard playing in this minor British film,notwithstanding the fact that it has a distinguished cast.Howard is a policeman who along with his friends has been swindled out of his savings by one of the schemes run by financier,Cedric Hardwicke.So they devise a scheme to kidnap Hardwicke's wife,Binnie Barnes and demand a ransom of 5million francs to cover the loss that they suffered.Barnes however escapes and returns home at the moment when Howard is collecting his money.However she has fallen in love with him and in the end helps to extricate the funds out of her reluctant husband.The last part of this film has some curious dialogue.It is spoken in a rather staccato manner,each sentence, each response lasting about 5 words.Given that he had previously finished Of Human Bondage and would shortly go to star on Broadway in The Petrified Forest,this is a rather strange film to have starred in.Clearly destined to support an American A feature.Not a particularly good film,the whole idea is much better done in Too Many Crooks.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed