IMDb RATING
7.1/10
3.4K
YOUR RATING
A convent girl is abducted and seduced by a prince before being sent off to a brothel in East Africa.A convent girl is abducted and seduced by a prince before being sent off to a brothel in East Africa.A convent girl is abducted and seduced by a prince before being sent off to a brothel in East Africa.
- Awards
- 1 win
Sylvia Ashton
- Kelly's Aunt
- (uncredited)
Wilson Benge
- Prince Wolfram's Valet
- (uncredited)
Sidney Bracey
- Prince Wolfram's Lackey
- (uncredited)
Rae Daggett
- Coughdrops
- (uncredited)
Robert Frazier
- Catholic Priest
- (uncredited)
Florence Gibson
- Kelly's Aunt
- (uncredited)
Madge Hunt
- Mother Superior
- (uncredited)
Tully Marshall
- Jan Vryheid
- (uncredited)
Ann Morgan
- Maid Escorting Kelly to Altar
- (uncredited)
Madame Sul-Te-Wan
- Kali Sana - Aunt's Cook
- (uncredited)
Lucille Van Lent
- Prince Wolfram's Maid
- (uncredited)
Wilhelm von Brincken
- Prince Wolfram's Adjutant
- (uncredited)
Gordon Westcott
- Lackey
- (uncredited)
- Directors
- Erich von Stroheim
- Richard Boleslawski(uncredited)
- Writers
- Erich von Stroheim
- Marian Ainslee
- Benjamin Glazer(uncredited)
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaWhen Tully Marshall dribbled tobacco juice on Gloria Swanson's hand during the wedding sequence and explained that director Erich von Stroheim ordered him to do it, it was the final straw. She called producer Joseph P. Kennedy and demanded that von Stroheim be fired. He was, effectively shutting down the production.
- GoofsThe positions of the two different groups, the troops and the convent girls, are constantly changing in relation to the shrine on Kambach road.
- Quotes
[as Wolfram and Fritz are racing their horses down the street]
Girl 1: Come on, Wild Wolfram! I've bet my nightie on you!
Girl 2: Come on, Fritz! She hasn't GOT a nightie!
- Alternate versionsDirector Erich von Stroheim never completed the film: the ending is made using stills and subtitles. The European version has a different storyline than the American one.
- ConnectionsEdited from Queen Kelly: The Kino Restored International Ending (2011)
Featured review
A Luminous "Queen Kelly"
The restored version of "Queen Kelly' shown on TCM recently was a revelation to those of us who only knew Gloria Swanson from "Sunset Boulevard" in the '50's. Swanson in 1928 had incredibly large and luminous (?green?) eyes, as well as that curiously angular lower jaw still evident in "Boulevard". She seemed fairly tall and almost husky in "Kelly", compared to many women (and men) of the 20's to the 50's who were physically quite small, and looked it in their screen roles. She was lovely in a unique way.
More importantly, I thought Swanson was GREAT in the part. What an incredible range of facial and body expressiveness! Given the restrictions of the plot, and doubtless a domineering director, Swanson did a tremendous job in making her character seem believable. Yes, perhaps she did look older than 18, but in my opinion, she could pass for 21 or so. She certainly didn't look older than her 31 years, as another reviewer opines. Perhaps her sheer acting skill and range of motion were convincing enough to play 10 years younger than her true age. It's done all the time on the stage and screen, why wouldn't it be acceptable in this 1928 film?
I found Walter Byron gorgeous, and strangely modern in his good looks. Not of the now-hackneyed strong-profile leading man variety popular in early films. Instead, he was impeccably groomed and costumed, with short, straight, slicked-back hair. A beautiful sight to behold. He did a very good job within the constraints of silent acting. I'll be looking for more of his work.
The Jan VanHeidt character was almost too-disgusting to be credible, but archetypes were more pronounced in the silent genre. The actor did a very credible job, doubtless under the director's specific instructions about how to convey his debauched and depraved condition.
Perhaps it's because so much of the film was lost and/or cut, but Kelly's acquiescence to marrying the dissolute Jan seemed inexplicable to me. Von Stoheim went to a lot of trouble to give Swanson a L-O-N-G flashback while the wedding ceremony was being read which included the Prince's admonition to Kelly not to "forget him", "forsake him", or words to that effect. Yet she says yes anyway. You have to make a lot of assumptions about Kelly's character and personality to justify her decision, and rationalize in your own mind why on earth she didn't manifest some gumption and say after due consternation and anguish, "No, No, Never!".
This is a technically beautiful film. The lighting, sets, costumes, etc. are wonderful! Well worth seeing, even with the missing film and downbeat ending.
More importantly, I thought Swanson was GREAT in the part. What an incredible range of facial and body expressiveness! Given the restrictions of the plot, and doubtless a domineering director, Swanson did a tremendous job in making her character seem believable. Yes, perhaps she did look older than 18, but in my opinion, she could pass for 21 or so. She certainly didn't look older than her 31 years, as another reviewer opines. Perhaps her sheer acting skill and range of motion were convincing enough to play 10 years younger than her true age. It's done all the time on the stage and screen, why wouldn't it be acceptable in this 1928 film?
I found Walter Byron gorgeous, and strangely modern in his good looks. Not of the now-hackneyed strong-profile leading man variety popular in early films. Instead, he was impeccably groomed and costumed, with short, straight, slicked-back hair. A beautiful sight to behold. He did a very good job within the constraints of silent acting. I'll be looking for more of his work.
The Jan VanHeidt character was almost too-disgusting to be credible, but archetypes were more pronounced in the silent genre. The actor did a very credible job, doubtless under the director's specific instructions about how to convey his debauched and depraved condition.
Perhaps it's because so much of the film was lost and/or cut, but Kelly's acquiescence to marrying the dissolute Jan seemed inexplicable to me. Von Stoheim went to a lot of trouble to give Swanson a L-O-N-G flashback while the wedding ceremony was being read which included the Prince's admonition to Kelly not to "forget him", "forsake him", or words to that effect. Yet she says yes anyway. You have to make a lot of assumptions about Kelly's character and personality to justify her decision, and rationalize in your own mind why on earth she didn't manifest some gumption and say after due consternation and anguish, "No, No, Never!".
This is a technically beautiful film. The lighting, sets, costumes, etc. are wonderful! Well worth seeing, even with the missing film and downbeat ending.
helpful•93
- jazzfantastic
- Jul 14, 2006
- How long is Queen Kelly?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $800,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 41 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content