The Man Who Laughs (1928) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
91 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Grotesque, Macabre, and Influential Silent Classic
gftbiloxi8 March 2008
Like most artistic "isms," expressionism is somewhat difficult to define; in general, however, it refers to a style in which the artist is much less interested in capturing external realities than in portraying emotional and psychological states; consequently, expressionism is often fantastic in a visual sense--and when it combined with the darker edges of Germanic folklore it gave rise to a series of classic and near-classic silent films, including THE CABINET OF DR. CALIGARI, NOSFERATU, THE GOLEM, and WAXWORKS.

Over time, the style began to creep into American film. This was most particularly true of films made at Universal Studios, which had major successes with such Gothic-inflected films as THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME and THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA, both of which starred Lon Chaney. Drawn from a minor work by Victor Hugo, THE MAN WHO LAUGHS was first intended as a Chaney vehicle; by the time it began production, however, Chaney had decamped to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer--and Universal assigned Conrad Veidt to the starring role under director Paul Leni. Both men had been deeply involved in the German expressionist movement, and the resulting film was a melodrama so deeply steeped in the grotesque that it came to be regarded as a horror film.

THE MAN WHO LAUGHS concerns a child named Gwynplaine who is caught up in royal intrigue and is deliberately disfigured, his mouth cut into a ghastly, inflexible grin. Abandoned, he rescues an blind infant girl; both are taken in by the kindly Ursus (Cesare Gravina.) Years later, and entirely unaware of his aristocratic origin, Gwynplaine (Veidt) and the beautiful blind maiden Dea (Mary Philbin) are popular carnival actors, appearing in a play written by Ursus--but although he loves Dea, Gwynplaine is deeply humiliated by his eternal grin and feels he can never marry. Ironically, it is not until he is once more caught up in a royal powerplay and recognized as a peer that he realizes the depth of Dea's love.

In some ways the plot is simplistic and occasionally too much so, but the look of the thing is relentlessly fascinating. Director Leni endows his world with grotesque faces, vulgar sexuality, and deliberately twisted visuals--particularly so in the first half of the film, which is greatly famous for the sequence in which the abandoned child stumbles through a snow storm beneath gallows bearing rotting corpses to find the infant Dea. Veidt's hideous grin, an early creation by make up genius Jack Pierce, is remarkably effective; the performances are memorable, and although the second half of the film is excessively predictable the whole thing goes off with a bang.

Although it was hardly a failure, in 1928 THE MAN WHO LAUGHS proved too gruesome for many audiences, and the rise of sound films drove it into a too-rapid obscurity. Even so, it would cast a very long shadow: it is an important link in the chain between German expressionism and the great Hollywood horror classics of the early 1930s. The Kino DVD presents a reasonable but far from flawless transfer of the film, along with several bonus features, most significantly a "making of" documentary that details the film's stylistic importance. Recommended for fans of classic horror.

GFT, Amazon Reviewer
24 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Joker Is Wild
wes-connors23 March 2008
In jolly old England, Julius Molnar Jr. (as young Gwynplaine) has a permanent grin surgically carved on his face "so he might laugh forever at his fool of a father" who refused to kiss the hand of his King. The disfigured lad rescues a blind baby, and they are adopted by fatherly Cesare Gravina (as Ursus). The children grow into Conrad Veidt (as Gwynplaine) and Mary Philbin (as Dea). The trio support themselves as a traveling freak show, featuring Mr. Veidt's "The Laughing Man" grin, which has become ever more grotesque with age. Still blind, but movie-star-beautiful as an adult, Ms. Philbin falls for her good-natured rescuer; she thinks God took her eyes so that she could see the good in "Gwynplaine". Veidt cares for Philbin, but is distracted by the possible love of a sighted woman, the seductive Olga Baclanova (as Duchess Josiana).

Paul Leni's "The Man Who Laughs" makes up for a story that goes to the dogs (quite literally!) by being too beautifully produced to dismiss. Additionally, Veidt's performance is electrifying. Especially representative of his work in this film is Veidt's "seduction" scene, with Ms. Baclanova; and, she is surely the film's "Best Supporting Actress". Everyone, from Philbin to extras and bit players, is very good. Interestingly, Veidt was eligible for an Academy Award, but was not nominated. Then, neither was Lon Chaney, for "Laugh, Clown, Laugh". They had no sense of humor, obviously.

******** The Man Who Laughs (4/27/28) Paul Leni ~ Conrad Veidt, Mary Philbin, Olga Baclanova, Brandon Hurst
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gwynplaine, the inspiration for the Joker
Lady_Targaryen28 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I watched ''The Man Who Laughs'' just yesterday, curious to see the character that bob Kane based to create the famous villain from the Batman series, The Joker.

This movie, originally a novel by Victor Hugo,takes place in England from the seventeenth century, when a young son from a nobleman is sold to the gypsies Compranchicos(illegal child buyers) that carved a permanent grin on his face. The boy, named Gwynplaine, is abandoned in the cold snowing winter, and while looking for a shelter, he finds a baby hold in the arms of her dead mother. He takes the baby with him and finds a nice play to stay with an old man called Ursus, that raises the baby,who he discover that is blind, and Gwynplaine. Many years later, Gwynplaine works as a clown together with the blind Dea, that was the little baby he saved. They are both in love with each other, but since Gwynplaine is always considered a joke by the people because of his grin, he thinks that Dea deserves someone better then him to marry. But when secrets about Gwynplaine's blood are known by the Queen's jester, his pacific life is going to change for good.

The story of the romance between Gwynplaine and Dea, remembers me a lot the story of the romance between Cyrano and Roxane( from ''Cyrano de Bergerac''), where Cyrano, too embarrassed by his large nose and ugly appearance, refuses to tell the beautiful Roxane about his feelings for her. Not only the ugly looks and the love for a beauty, but also the fact that both Cyrano and Gwynplaine are good people, makes these characters very similar in many ways to me.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Veidt and Leni and Victor Hugo
rfkeser24 July 2000
A lord refuses to kiss the hand of King James II, so is doubly punished: he perishes in the "Iron Lady" [onscreen in a memorably handled sequence] while his son is sent to a surgeon who [offscreen] carves a grin on his face "so he can forever laugh at his father". Sheltered by a kindly playwright ["like Shakespeare, only much better!"], the boy grows up to join his troupe of itinerant players as the star attraction: "The Man Who Laughs". His fortunes lead him to a blind girl, an ambitious duchess, and Queen Anne, who reinstates him to the nobility, but with further complications.

Conrad Veidt, in a career stretching from CALIGARI to CASABLANCA, always found the emotional authenticity in bizarre roles. Here, in the familiar 19th century figure of the suffering clown, his performance is transfixing: whether tremulous as the girl's hand explores his face, or mortified by the laughter of the House of Lords, Veidt's face makes the role more than a simple martyr: he is man struggling with unjust destiny ["A king made me a clown, a queen made me a lord, but first God made me a man!"].

Big-hearted and unashamedly dramatic, this is clearly the work of Victor Hugo, rags to riches in scope, offering consolation in love. The spirit of the French Revolution is very much in the air in this world of cruel privilege and class antagonism, full of secret doors, dungeons, and volatile mobs. While not as richly populated as Les Miserables and Hunchback, this adaptation still has spectacular set-pieces and elaborate settings.

Considerably less revolutionary is the conventional portrayal of women: virgin and vamp are the only alternatives. The former is the blind girl played by Mary Philbin [who had earlier unmasked Lon Chaney's Phantom]. With blond ringlets arranged to make her face heart-shaped, she edges close to simpering yet rises to genuinely moving moments. The vamp is Olga Baclanova [who became the blonde tormentor in Tod Browning's FREAKS], here writhing around in a black negligee and looking startlingly like Madonna.

Today, the films of Paul Leni are hard to track down, but worth the effort. Starting as an art director, Leni developed his visual command in Berlin; this Germanic style stands out in some beautifully designed compositions, such as a dynamic night sequence: a ship, full of gypsies being deported, heaves through a furious snowstorm. Yet Leni always works at the heart of the human values in the story, sustaining intense moments for all his actors. While some scenes are staged in darkness to rival a film noir, Leni also floods Veidt and Philbin with light, often focusing on one nuance per shot, an old-fashioned but effective strategy.

Filmed on the cusp of the sound revolution, this semi-silent has added sound effects and rather vague non-stop music but no spoken dialogue.
36 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pure Classic
BaronBl00d10 August 2001
A young boy is terribly disfigured by roving gypsies by the order of King James II of England as a punishment to one of his disobeying nobles. The gypsies carve a permanent smile in the young boy's face and then leave him for dead as they leave for their homeland. The young boy wanders aimlessly for shelter amidst the cold coastline filled with snow, ruins, and swinging bodies from the hangman's noose in the background. Here he finds an infant..alive..clutched in the frozen hands of a woman whose husband was hanged. This was the beginning of The Man Who Laughs...and it was so powerfully filmed that a race of emotions filled me as I watched awe-struck, yet horrified. Paul Leni directed this great film based on the novel by Victor Hugo. Conrad Veidt plays the grown Gwynplaine who travels around the English countryside with his adopted parent Ursus the Philosopher and the young Dea, the girl whose life he saved as a baby. Dea has turned into a blooming young woman, yet blind from her birth. Dea is played very nicely by Mary Philbin, who played in The Phantom of the Opera(1925) in the female lead. The way Leni has the characters interact is very effective. We can feel the tension in Veidt's character as he submits to the growing pains of love. We feel his sorrow as he cries through smiles. The rest of the film involves a royal plot by the queen and her henchman/jester(by the way, Brandon Hurst does a phenomenal job as this cruel heartless jester) to reinstate some royal property to Gwynplaine so he can be married to a duchess that the queen does not like. The story is pretty good and one can see where it is going early on, but the way Leni creates suspense and pathos overpowers any negative defects. The acting all around is very strong. This is a powerful film on many levels. It is an emotional rollercoaster ride through love, hate, despair, joy, and much more. I laughed; I cried. The best part though was that the film has a marvelous message about perceptions. Here we have this character Gwynplaine that smiles outwardly and makes people laugh, but he is full of despair. He cries on the inside. People should not always be taken at face value. By the way, Bob Kane, the creator of Batman, credits this film and the character of Gywnplaine for his creation of the Joker. I can see how. Watch this and the silent version of The Bat in the same evening and you will see what stirred a young Bob Kane's imagination.
53 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Lovely... a must see!!!
Chaves777730 March 2007
I always think that Paul Leni's "The Man Who Laughs" was another silent horror piece with a lot of good ideas and thrilling scenes. Well... i was not wrong, except in the "horror" thing, and I lack to think of the beauty that could give me. Actually, "The Man Who Laughs" is one of the best silent films (With "Broken Blossoms" and "Metropolis") that i have ever seen ever. As too one of the most beautiful films that i have ever seen too.

"The Man Who Laughs", based on Victor Hugo's novel, told us the story of Gwynplaine (Great performance of Conrad Veidt, who too appeared as Cesare in famous "Cabinet of Dr. Caligari", participate in the first gay themed film in history "Diffrent from the Others" and "Casabalanca") a man that, when he was little, was operated by an evil man and now, his face always have a long smile. When he was little, he finds a death mother with a newly born one, a beautiful girl, but she is blind. Then he finds help, home and food with Ursus. Years later, he grown up, as the lovely girl, now a beautiful woman named Dea. With Ursus (Now, he is old) go with a fair. For their side there is the evil Barkilpehdro, who was the responsible of our dear main character's sad circumstances. This evil character do it for one thing, power... Gwynplaine doesn't know that he could be a powerful man. Now, back with Gwynplaine, we find a big saddest by him, he don't want to be a clown. And Dea is the only person who see the real Gwynplane. Then we find the story of a beautiful but evil and rebel duchess (Perfomed perfectly by Olga Baclanova, who appeared too in "Freaks"),she has as pupil: the evil Barkilphedro. So, what do you think that happen if all this characters find them in a fair? Just watch it out, and be prepared, because is a thrilling experience.

In my personal opinion, "The Man Who Laughs" is an important piece of the history of cinema, maybe , of their time too. First of all, the love story is so tender, so beautiful... that i don't think yet that exist such movie!!! Then, the stages, all the scenario is perfect, makes us to feel what it wants. Is here too another personal opinion, i think that "The Man Who Laughs" it was early to their time, Paul Leni (Director of "The Cat and the Cannary" and "Waxworks"). Its just that the movie present topics that in that time was very difficult to show, or was too (talkin about film technique) novel, or in other word: new. For example, there is a scene when a man watch through the bolt of a door to the duchess taking a bath, yes it doesn't show her nude, but certainly, what they show it was much for this time, i think. In film technique i can give a lot of examples, for example, mix of sounds in a lot of scenes, camera moves... etc... i can put a lot of examples. In few words, "The Man Who Laughs" is a real masterpiece, a real must see. This is a beautiful film, and i loved it. Try to see it if you have not see it yet. If you love excellent films, if you love silent films, if you love beautiful films, if you love thrilling films, if you love touching films... you must see "The Man Who Laughs"

*Sorry for the mistakes, well... if there any.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Comical character names do not diminish the story
CelluloidRehab24 October 2004
The Man Who Laughs is a movie adaptation of a Victor Hugo novel. It is the story of Gmynplaine, the son of a disgraced noblemen who is facially mutilated by gypsies. He has a permanent smile (definitely a family resemblance to Jack Nicolson's Joker... except without the criminal and deranged aspect). German Expressionist actor, Conrad Veidt plays the lead role. His performance is exceptional, especially when one realizes that the smile-face prosthesis prevented him from talking (Universal had played with the idea to make this movie a talkie at first). The theme is a combination of love and personal tragedy. The story revolves mostly around those 2 themes. The set pieces are dark and grim, but feel "real". The close ups are typical of the silent movie era, however, the event scenes are not. Such scenes as the Iron Lady torture scene and the performance of the play set this movie apart from others of the time. The smile itself is the most poignant aspect conveying comedy, sadness and at times creepiness. There are some unintentional comical aspects. For example, Homo the dog. It makes lines like "Homo, where are you taking me?", into a chuckle opportunity . There is also the line towards the end where our hero calls out for the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). All in all this is a classic movie. This movie is not recommended for today's movie audience, as the silent movie aspect will probably put most into a popcorn/soda coma. For those that appreciate the silent movie, I highly recommend it.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Magnificent Classic of Victor Hugo's Novel
claudio_carvalho24 September 2006
In 1690, in England, the nobleman Lord Clancharlie returns from his exile to see his young son. The peer is captured by the cruel King James II and before being killed, he is informed that his beloved son had been sold to the gypsies Comanchicos that carved a permanent grin on his face. The Cormanchicos abandon the boy in the cold snowing winter, and while looking for shelter, he finds a baby hold in the arms of her dead mother. He brings the baby with him and they are welcomed by the philosopher Ursus (Cesare Gravina), who finds that the baby is blind and raises them. Years later, Gwynplaine (Conrad Veidt) becomes a successful clown, and together with the blind Dea (Mary Philbin), they present plays for common people. Gwynplaine and Dea are in love for each other, but he refuses to marry her because of his ridiculous appearance. When the evil jester Barkilphedro (Brandon Hurst) discloses the origin of Gwynplaine, he plots a means to be rewarded by the Queen, jeopardizing the love of Gwynplaine and Dea.

The Man Who Laughs" is a magnificent classic based on the famous Victor Hugo's novel. The performances of Conrad Veidt and Brandon Hurst are amazing and there are many touching and heartbreaking scenes. My eyes became wet when the artists act like the audience cheering for Gwynplaine to spare Dea from the truth. The appearance of the character Gwynplaine inspired Bob Kane in the creation of "The Joker", one of Batman's greatest enemies. Another point that I would like to highlight is the resemblance of Madonna, in the beginning of her career, with the Russian actress Olga Baclanova, who performs daring scenes including of nude with her amoral character of Duchess Josiana. I have never read Victor Hugo's novel, but it seems that the conclusion in the original story is less optimistic than in this movie, but anyway I loved this film. My vote is ten.

Title (Brazil): "O Homem Que Ri" ("The Man Who Laughs")
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Leni and Veidt in Hollywood
mccrohan7 August 2006
Yhis is a very entertaining movie which contains all of the polish and slickness that the Hollywood studio system with a big budget can provide. That said I do not consider it to be a great movie. I have only to contrast it with Paul Leni,s earlier film "Waxworks" which I regard as vastly superior. It is likely that Paul Leni was entranced by the vast and expensive resources of the Universal Studio. As for Conrad Veidt,s acting and I consider that his ability was not fully utilised. He does not display the genius that was present in his performance in "The Student of Prague. Perhaps I have been a little harsh in my opinions because I derived more pleasure from viewing this film than any of the recent latest 2006 movies from Hollywood.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hell Hath No Fury Like a Monarch Scorned!
JohnHowardReid4 March 2008
A most extraordinary movie, filmed on an absolutely staggering scale in the most extravagant yet stylish manner possible by director Paul Leni. Superbly photographed, costumed and set, this handsomely atmospheric horror piece is certainly one of a kind. In its own peculiarly dark niche, I can think of no other competitors, not even Universal's own "Hunchback of Notre Dame".

This movie has the further advantage of a far superior cast. Mary Philbin betters her portrayal in "Hunchback" by a mile, while Conrad Veidt in a Chaney-type role easily steals the picture by sheer charisma rather than simply horrific make-up. Mind you, he is given a good run for his money by Brandon Hurst as the scheming villain, Baclanova as the sexy Josiana, and Josephine Crowell (in her final feature film) as the imperious queen.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A really good silent film
shweta-5165721 January 2020
What an absolute under-rated movie. Conrad Veidt has to be applauded for his performance. This being a silent movie, the actor was further handicapped as the use of his mouth was constantly featured as the infamous Joker's grin and yet he had managed such a heartfelt performance.

7.5/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A king made him, a clown! A queen made him a lord! But first, God made him, a man!! This is very powerful movie!
ironhorse_iv3 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This is a great emotional driven picture! Directed by the German Expressionist filmmaker Paul Leni. The film is an adaptation of Victor Hugo's novel of the same name. The movie tells the story of Gwynplaine (Conrad Veidt), who bears a face disfigured by child torture into a permanent smile, because his noble father refuse to obey the King of England. He makes a living with his adopted father, Ursus (Cesare Gravina) & girlfriend, a beauty blind woman named Dea (Mary Philbin), traveling town to town, performing plays. Upon doing a show at a village fair, Gwynplaine attracts the attention of the bored, sexy, but trouble, duchess Josiana (Olga Baclanova). He soon gains more attention from the royals, after it is found out that Gwynplaine is the son and heir to Lord's position and estate. Now, Gwynplaine must choose, between a life of luxury, without love, or being poor without love. Which one will he choose? Watch the movie to find out! Without spoiling the movie too much, the movie is very powerful! It exposed the crudity and evil that exist in all of human society. Not only does, it satirically, make fun of the emptiness, immorality and meaninglessness of some of the rich, but it show the silly ugliness of some of the poor when it comes to their sinful acts. Both social classes are shown being devastating wickedness to the weak, downtrodden and disabled, lower forms of society. While, the movie can be, somewhat dark and grit, integrated with this theme is the secondary theme of the conflict between moral and immoral love-love guided by the spirit and love guided by the flesh. Hugo does very well to show that Dea loves Gwynplaine for his kind spirit, but Josiana loves him for his devilish looks. Yet, another theme to come out of this film is the struggles of man-against all the forces in life which seek to destroy his spirit and cow him to go things, against his will. In truth, Gwnplaine does not want to be forced to make a living off, of people making fun of his facial disability, but he also, doesn't want to be forced into an arranged marriage, he doesn't feel comfortable, just to live life in luxury. Gwynplaine is the symbol of the basic problem confronting mankind. He's there, to remind people of all classes, that humans are savage in nature, and that civilization can never be more than an idea. Hugo therefore chooses to him to become a satire mockery of society. A walking joke, that shows, that no matter, how civilize, we are; we are only one foot away from the jungle. Dea is the symbol of ideal love. Based on the recognition of the values held by and virtues of man, totally oblivious of man's physical appearance. Indeed, true love is blind. I just glad, they change the sad ending to a happy ending. Their character really did deserve it, after the things, they went through. Both actors did well with their roles. As much as certain critics, wanted the title role to go to the original actor, plan for this; Lon Chaney. I think Conrad Veidt did the role, much better. Conrad Veidt is captivating as Gwynplaine. The way, he able to show sadness, while smiling is haunting. Despite, what Hollywood lore, may say, Conrad Veidt never replace Lon Chaney, because Chaney storm, out, during production. They choose Conrad Veidt to replace him, because he was a better actor for the role. That shows you, how good Conrad Veidt really was. He is compelling, emotive and unforgettable in his role. Mary Philbin was the same thing. Yes, she doesn't get to do much besides smile and look pretty, but she does realistically portray a blind woman, a definite acting challenge. Her acting really remind me so much of Dorothy Gish in 1921's Orphans of the Storm. She was amazing! Olga Baclanova is very charismatic as Duchess Josiana, alluring, flirtatious and imperious. Her resemblance to modern singer Madonna in The Man Who Laughs, in both looks and attitude, is pretty strange, when you think about it. Brandon Hurst does a phenomenal job as the cruel heartless villain. He was very season. Great performance. One thing, I kinda dislike, about certain modern critics, is how they overlook this film, due to Gwynplaine's appearance. They often classified this film, as a horror movie, due to the heroes' evil looking smile. While, it's true, that the carnival freak-like grin on the character Gwynplaine's face, was a direct inspiration for The Joker character in Batman comic folklore, and yes, the movie does have some dark grotesque moments, like the Iron Maiden scene or the half frozen hanging skeletons, but that's only in the beginning of the film. The rest of the movie, feels like a sex romantic melodrama. Lots of pre-code, near-nudity. There was even some comedy. Stuart Holmes as Lord Dirry-Moir was hilarious. I think, most people mistake the German Expressionism filmmaking style as just a horror film, style. They really forget that some of the most popular film noirs, historic, or Sci-fiction films have this style. Anyways, the film was one of the early silent/sound films. Some copies of this movie does have sound effects on them. Sadly, they're somewhat annoying. The music score that came with this movie, "When Love Comes Stealing," by Walter Hirsch, Lew Pollack, and Erno Rapee is worth checking out. While, the movie is dated. This movie did help influence others films. It even got some modern remakes and some cameos in other films. Overall: This movie is compelling masterpiece. One of the best silent films ever made. The fact that this movie is hardly known today is a shame. The joke is on you, if you haven't saw this film. It's a smiling good time. Go see it! You'll be glad that you did.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A gothic historical romance to be remembered for experimental characterisation from the pioneering phase of Cinema.
SAMTHEBESTEST15 July 2021
The Man Who Laughs (1928) : Brief Review -

A gothic historical romance to be remembered for experimental characterisation from the pioneering phase of Cinema. 20s decade had given us major influential classics by setting up so many genres and characters. Whether it was horror (Nosferatu), psychological thriller (The Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari), Mythological Horror (Haxan), Horror Thriller (The Phantom Of Opera), Sci Fi (The Golem, Metropolis), Adverture (The Thief Of Bagdad), Animation (The Adventures of Prince Achmed) and other mainstream genres. Also, in the same decade we got many experimental characters in the same genres mentioned above and The Man Who Laughs should be another addition in the list. Those were the days when filmmakers and actors used to dare taking up challenges and that's why those films/characters became iconic. Lon Chaney's 'He Who Gets Slapped' brought that Clawn theory and how. The man who Laughs is on the same lines but with that 'carved smile on face' segment which today's audience has seen from Joker's character in DC's Batman movies. Well, this was many decades ago so you know it is a path breaking stuff. When a proud noble refuses to kiss the hand of the despotic King James in 1690, he is cruelly executed and his son surgically disfigured. Conrad Veidt plays the carved man and you feel him the way he acts. Not just in emotional scenes but in other eventful scenes also. Mary Philbin plays a blind girl and his lover and she is very sweet. Other cast members are okay. Paul Leni, known for German Expressionism, had something else to say this time and he successfully managed to express the human drama in right manners. One or two things didn't work the way it should have and it came 4-5 years late too, but otherwise it's a very nice film and definitely recommendable for some experimental and imaginative elements.

RATING - 7/10*

By - #samthebestest.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Slow-moving historical drama
preppy-325 September 2015
This takes place in 17th century England. A young noble mans son Gwynplaine (played as an adult by Conrad Veidt) is kidnapped by a political enemy. He then has a surgeon carve a monstrous grin on the boys face. Years later he's part of a freak show and in love with a beautiful blind girl (Mary Philbin). However his political personage becomes known and causes trouble.

This is usually advertised as a horror film due to Veidt's hideous grin but it's not. It's a slow-moving and frankly boring historical drama. Universal spend a lot of money on this and it shows. The sets and costumes are very elaborate and it IS well-directed by Paul Leni. Also Veidt is great in his role. He had to convey all his emotions through his eyes and pulls it off. However I was bored silly and had my finger of the fast forward button more than once. Also Mary Philbin was terrible as the blind girl. Boring and uninvolving.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watch it twice in a row to take it all in!
rmartyna1 October 2003
This was our first Conrad Veidt experience. The Man Who Laughs is a spellbinding piece of visual art. Veidt's acting is sensational. I knew the plot of the story and wondered how he would portray feelings of sadness and regret with a permanent smile carved on his face. After viewing the tape, we were amazed how the emotions exuded from the TV screen. This is our second Mary Philbin experience and both of us prefer her acting in this movie to her role in The Phantom of the Opera.

We have viewed silents on the TV screen as well as the big screen. We discovered that there is more of the "larger than life" emotions projected and felt by the audience through the larger screenings that is somewhat missed on the 27" TV screen. Not so with this performance. My wife and I were both moved to watch it from the beginning...one more time.
47 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A King made me a Clown, A Queen made me a peer, but first God made me a Man!
DarthVoorhees20 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The Man Who Laughs is one of the best love stories of the silent era and it is in essence the best Lon Chaney movie not starring Lon Chaney. Conrad Veidt gives the performance of his career as Gwynplaine, a man of royal blood who is punished for the sins of his father. He has a horrible grin carved into his face so he is forever smiling on the outside or "Laughing at his fool of a father" Gwynplaine is given this horrible scar by the infamous gypsies the Comprachios, he is abandoned by them and is taken in by a carnival traveler called Ursus along with a poor blind baby who is named Dea. Gwynplaine grows up a shattered man with no sense of pride in his life other than his deep love for Dea. He feels as if he doesn't deserve Dea and has to become something more than the "clown" the world has cruelly dubbed him as.

Geez those who think Gwynplaine is the inspiration for the Joker couldn't be farther from the truth. Visually yes but Gwynplaine is the only truly decent character in this film. The film is also miscorrectly labeled as a horror film, it is actually a tragedy in my opinion. However the classification of a horror film isn't far off, Paul Leni deeply roots the set and make-up design in his natural German Expressionism. The shadows and set designs are beautiful and is really the last example of this masterful method of film-making. No star knows how to better match this than Conrad Veidt, the star of the masterpiece The Cabinet of Dr Calagari. This performance is breathtaking, every scene he is in he dominates. His on screen presence is huge and overwhelming in a great way. It's a genuinely touching story and we feel deeply for Gwynplaine when we might not feel as much for other characters.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Lon Chaney Could Not Have Bettered Conrad Veidt's Performance!!!
kidboots6 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
When Universal found that they had two monumental successes on their hands with "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" and "The Phantom of the Opera", both of whom had for their main characters a being so deformed and hideous, they turned once again to Victor Hugo for what they hoped would be another hit. But Lon Chaney was not available - he had gone to MGM in the meantime and was now established as their top star and they were not about to lend him. The late 1920s saw German expressionism at it's height in Hollywood and the studios at the forefront of the surge were Fox and Universal. So Universal turned to the country of it's founder's birth and in particular a thriller called "Waxworks" to find both a new director, Paul Leni, and a star, Conrad Veidt.

The very grim Victor Hugo story is about an outlaw band - the dreaded Comprachicos, whose surgeon roves the country carving huge grotesque grins onto young children's faces, forcing them to grow up to become side show freaks. There are some chilling images in the prologue where Gwynplaine, as a child, wanders among bodies and human bones hanging from scaffolds as a blizzard whips up. The little boy then finds the blind Dea clasped in her dead mother's arms. The England that Paul Leni has conjured up is a bleak and haunted world.

As the years go on Gwynplaine (Veidt) becomes the "laughing man", a strolling player in the troupe of Father Ursus (Cesare Gravina), the one person who didn't turn his back on the orphans, but to Dea (beautiful Mary Philbin), who cannot see his hideous grin, he will always be goodness and light. Chaney could not have bettered Veidt's performance in which his eyes are truly the windows to his soul.

At Southwark Fair, one of the sideshow proprietors (George Siegman, a Griffith regular) realises that Gwynplaine is the missing heir to Lord Clancharlie's estates, now taken over by the seductive Duchess Josiana and the ambitious Barkiphedro who had Gwynplaine's father tortured and killed in the "Iron Lady" over 20 years before. Olga Baclanova is just a sensation - the censor must have been asleep - she has two nude scenes within her first introduction and she plays a Countess who loves nothing better than donning dirty peasant rags and mingling (and allowing them to take great liberties) with the ruffians down at the fair.

The last part of the film is very Griffith influenced ("Orphans of the Storm"). Gwynplaine's castle and land have rightfully been restored to him but he is being forced into marriage with the lustful Josiana. Dea (like the blind Louisa in "Orphans") is thwarted at every turn until she and Ursus are forced from the city by the power hungry Barkiphedro, then it is Gwynplaine's turn to race through the town. His head was turned by Josiana and in the scene where she strips away his mask and, displaying both lust and loathing, kisses his deformed mouth, there is so much sensuality and passion in her performance, a reviewer at the time commented that "she burns holes in the screen".

The Kino release that I have features a restored orchestral Movietone soundtrack, complete with a theme song "When Love Comes Stealing" that they may have hoped would be as popular as "7th Heaven's" "Diane" - but it wasn't.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A very interesting but not great film
psteier31 January 2001
One of the last of the big budget Hollywood silents. Not really a horror picture, but quite grotesque. It has a few scenes for those who like 'hot' precode films.

The wonderful cinematography, sets, costumes and the unusual mix of faces of the bit players and extras gives the film a very European look.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Sadness of Laughter
CJBx723 March 2015
THE MAN WHO LAUGHS (1928) is the tale of Gwynplaine (Conrad Veidt), who was disfigured as a boy as retaliation for his father's refusal to pay obeisance to King James II. With a blind foundling, Dea (Mary Philbin), he grows up to become a traveling performer. Gwynplaine is involved in court intrigue when an evil jester discovers his existence and plots an arranged marriage to control Gwynplaine's fortune as the heir to a lord. Directed by Paul Leni.

THE MAN WHO LAUGHS movingly portrays Gwynplaine's plight as a man who is marginalized by society. His disfigurement controls his life in many ways. Crowds laugh at Gwynplaine for his appearance, and he feels that no woman can love him because of his face (except for the blind Dea). The script touchingly conveys the love between Gwyplaine and Dea, who only sees the inner man. However, I felt that the exposition lacked clarity when the story dealt with Barkilphedro the jester's intrigue and the reasons for the arranged marriage. Was the jester planning to kill Gwynplaine and take the money as his own? His motivations are not fully clarified, except for the fact that he is evil. On the other hand, maybe it was a plan to rectify things for Gwynplaine. I wasn't sure. The narrative drags a bit in places but comes to a pretty epic and satisfying conclusion.

As far as the performances go, Conrad Veidt is compelling as Gwynplaine, haunting and expressive even though required to hold his face in the contorted laugh to which the title alludes. Veidt is compelling, emotive and unforgettable in his role. For much of her role Mary Philbin doesn't get to do much other than smile and look pretty, but she does realistically portray a blind woman, a definite acting challenge. She does best in her scenes with Veidt. Olga Baclanova is very charismatic as Duchess Josiana, alluring, flirtatious and imperious. Cesare Gravina, who plays Ursus, the philosopher who takes Gwynplaine in, overacts in the Grand Guignol style, something that would be practically obliterated from film about two years later when the switchover to talking film was finally complete.

The production is moody and evocative in the German Expressionist style, using light and shadow, as well as camera angles, to heighten the feeling of the film. I was able to watch the original version with a synchronized sound track. The music was appropriately vivid, and sound effects were added liberally to the score – especially crowd noise and clanging objects at the fair. This can be rather jarring at times, since these effects often play alongside the music, even during love scenes! However, it is an interesting artifact of the pre-talkie era, as Hollywood was learning how to incorporate recorded music into movies.

Overall, the story was moving when it came to Gwyplaine's plight, although somewhat muddy when dealing with the intrigue. Conrad Veidt and Olga Baclanova give compelling performances, with good support from Mary Philbin, and the style of the movie is quite intriguing. A fine movie from the late silent era. SCORE: 8/10
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The inspiration for the Joker
pontifikator30 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Conrad Veidt stars in the movie based on Victor Hugo's novel, L'Homme qui rit. In this silent film, a boy is sold by the King of England to "comprachicos," a word made up by Hugo to represent people who buy children to deform them for the amusement of noblemen and crowds at carnivals. The boy is Gwynplaine (played by Conrad Veidt). Abandoned by the comprachicos, Gwynplaine and an infant girl find shelter with a traveling mountebank Hugo has called Ursus (played by Cesare Gravina) and his pet Homo the wolf (played by Zimbo the dog). The infant grows up to be a beautiful blind blonde they call Dea.*

Gwynplaine is cruelly deformed by the comprachicos - his mouth is surgically altered into a permanent grin. Although Veidt may be best remembered as Major Strasser in "Casablanca," a role in which he appeared suitably dissolute, Veidt was a very attractive young man. His appearance here is bizarre because of the character's deformity, a deformity which makes Gwynplaine the object of ridicule and laughter, except of course to Dea, who cannot see him as he looks, but only as he really is. She falls in love with him, naturally; and just as naturally, Gwynplaine cannot accept her love because of his appearance: she'd laugh at him, too, if she could see him.

It turns out eventually that Gwynplaine is the sole heir to a dukedom; King James murdered Gwynplaine's father and sold (or dontated) Gwynplaine to the comprachicos, and they abandoned him as a child. Queen Anne came to the throne, and in this story the Queen had it in for a duchess who lived in Gwynplaine's former estate. Gwynplaine is discovered, and the Queen restores Gwynplaine to his estate and orders the duchess to marry him. Gwynplaine is a laughing stock of his peers, of course, so he declines the offer, resigns his peerage, and takes it on the lam. The queen is incensed by his refusal to obey her commands, and she sends the beefeaters after him.

Unfortunately, this is the only action in the movie. We know he'll escape to Dea and they'll live happily ever after, but the chase provides some much-needed interest. Most of the film shows us Gwynplaine in his misery, failing to make him sympathetic, heroic, or much of anything else. Produced by Universal, "The Man Who Laughs" was supposed to follow in the footsteps of its popular predecessors, "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" and "Phantom of the Opera," both of which starred Lon Chaney.

"The Man Who Laughs" was directed by the German Expressionist Paul Leni, who chose Veidt as his star since Chaney was unavailable. Leni's Expressionistic tendencies are obvious throughout the film in both set design and lighting. Unfortunately, American audiences failed to appreciate the look of the movie, and it was not a commercial success. I suspect the unsympathetic hero was also to blame. In "The Hunchback of Notre Dame," for example, Chaney's Quasimodo is a figure of horror, but still the audience roots for him and wishes Esmeralda would fall for him. Here we have no clue at all why Dea would love Gwynplaine. Gwynplaine fails entirely to interest us, much less to engage our sympathies.

The reasons to see "The Man Who Laughs" have little to do with the story. Gwynplaine's appearance in "The Man Who Laughs" was the inspiration the Batman comic book villain, The Joker. Heath Ledger's character The Joker in 2008's "The Dark Knight" says his disfigurement was caused by intentional mutilation, a reference to Gwynplaine.

Perhaps more important, the design of the movie was based on German expressionism. "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" is probably the most famous expressionist film, and it too stars Conrad Veidt who plays Cesare, the Somnambulist - another sideshow freak under the control of a mountebank. Although "The Man Who Laughs" was made in America by Universal Pictures, producer Carl Laemmle had been impressed with a German movie "Waxworks" and called on its director, German Paul Leni, to direct "The Man Who Laughs." The influence of expressionism on Leni is clear in the set and lighting designs, and this influence was not well received by American audiences who thought the lighting too dark and the sets too Germanic to be England. Later reviews of "The Man Who Laughs" praise it for its visual style, if not for its content. Leni was well-known in Germany for his works, and his American debut "The Cat and the Canary" was very well-received.

Coming at the end of the Twenties, the movie also came at the end of the Silents. Its release was held up a year so that Universal could couple it with sound of a sort: a music sound track and some sound effects were added, although there was no attempt at coupling sound with the dialogue - the title cards were left in to convey the dialogue.

Veidt himself is also of interest. He played Cesare, the Somnambulist in "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" and starred in Leni's film "Waxworks." Gwynplaine is a more difficult role because the immobility of his disfigured face prevents Veidt from doing much more than emoting with his eyebrows. Veidt seems to lack Chaney's talent for wringing pity from American audiences no matter what the make up was.

*Hugo has a method to his naming. Ursus of course means bear, and Homo means man; Dea means goddess (Dea was played by Mary Philbin). There the method leaves me, as I cannot divine the meaning behind Gwynplaine (which may mean pale plane - or maybe not).
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic. Just Wonderful.
ShinerMathison10 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I will take this to my grave as the best film I've ever known and it will now and always be my absolute favorite - as well as Conrad Veidt now becoming my all time favorite actor in history. He is an astonishingly handsome depiction for Gwynplaine. Even with that goofy grin, it is still apparent how good looking of a man Gwynplaine was. Conrad Veidt's ability to emote using just his eyes is incredible. He is so moving in this film! There is no denying how Gwynplaine feels at any point in time because of this incredible actor. I was also surprised to find out that this character was the original inspiration for the - now so popular - "Joker". I always liked the Joker for some reason. Harley Quinn has always been my favorite, but I do deeply love this "clown-like" character with no sense of evil or mischievousness. He is just such a sweetheart.

Warning - Possible Spoiler: I am overjoyed that this film did not keep with the original ending written by Victor Hugo. What a miserable man.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Confusing and Creepy
PCC09211 June 2021
Horror, Drama Format: Standard 4:3, B&W, silent Director: Paul Leni Starring: Mary Philbin, Conrad Veidt and Olga Baclanova

This one is a creepy, but confusing script, which starts out well, but crashes and burns by the time we get to the end. And, it is a shame too, because there are some really good scenes in the first half of the film. It utilizes excellent costumes and sets, along with a nice original soundtrack and SPFX, that are the highlights of this film. There is are some cleverly designed scenes. There also is a rumor that this character inspired the creation of the Joker, found in Batman comics 12 years later.

The best part of the film is Olga. The Madonna-looking (yes! That Madonna), Olga Baclanova (Docks of New York, 1928), is supreme as the Duchess Josiana and captures a sexiness that probably has not been witnessed to this point in film history. Plus, we see her naked! Which is awesome, because it is again, 1928. The film industry has reached its maturity with the dawn of the sound era. Unfortunately, the film becomes silly by the end and confusing. By the time you get to the end you even hate Homo, the dog.

6.9 (C MyGrade) = 7 IMDB.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the Very Best Silent Era Films
Hitchcoc2 July 2015
One of the things I noticed in viewing this was the tight editing. There is little wasted space. Many of the silent films are presented in jerky photographic moments, with the actors emoting and letting us figure out their motivations. This one begins with a sad event. A revolutionary pays the price of his life for not respecting James II. In addition to his execution, his little son is surgically altered to have a perpetual smile, to become the subject of ridicule, seeming to be laughing. The little boy is cast aside by the Gypsies that did this to him and on his journey finds a dead mother clutching a little baby girl. He seeks refuge in the home of a poet and this launches him on a career as a kind of freak actor. The little girl grows to be a beautiful woman, but she is blind. He feels great love for her, but is afraid that other women either hate him or pity him. He becomes a great celebrity, but is submerged in loneliness and depression, having to go in front of audiences each day to be a clown. Mixed into all this is the fact that he is heir to a great position and becomes a threat to the aristocracy and to the Queen. How this is all sorted out is utterly captivating. There is a little Les Miserables and a little Elephant Man in his portrayal. A truly remarkable film.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slow and sad, but ultimately satisfying.
actherandomthought1 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
After having watched The Phantom of the Opera a couple days ago, I happened upon this film, mistaking it for another horror film. Nevertheless, I still wanted to watch it because it starred the silent film legend Conrad Veidt and the beautiful Mary Philbin.

I thought the film was rather slow, but I still enjoyed it rather immensely. I found myself feeling for both of the main characters and even shed a few tears at certain points throughout the film. It was sad as well, often interpreted as melodramatic.

Honestly, for any film buff, this is a must-see. Despite it being very slow, it is definitely worth it to see it to the very end, and maybe even read the novel it is based off of by Victor Hugo.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"I protest!"
evening116 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A meditation on the disfiguring effects of low self-esteem.

Conrad Veidt is moving as Gwynplaine, deliberately mutilated in youth and forever relegated to the role of sideshow clown. Also interesting is Josiana (Olga Baclanova - later to appear in 1932's "Freaks"), a lascivious duchess who toys with the tortured performer.

Still, I found the movie to drag a bit in parts. Beautiful as she is, Mary Philbin's Dea lacks depth. And we never discover for ourselves exactly what makes Gwynplaine such a hit at the Southwark fairgrounds. The film would have benefited from tighter editing.

I did like this movie for an opportunity to look up the life of author Victor Hugo, whose daughter inspired the much later film, "The Story of Adele H," which I highly recommend.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed